Assessment of Dioxin Intake from Commercial Baby Food in Infant

2008 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Saito ◽  
Atsuko Ohmura ◽  
Mikiko Takekuma
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Škrbić ◽  
Jelena Živančev ◽  
Grigorije Jovanović ◽  
Marinella Farre

2015 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alba Mir-Marqués ◽  
Anna González-Masó ◽  
M. Luisa Cervera ◽  
Miguel de la Guardia

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 584-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Llorca ◽  
Marinella Farré ◽  
Yolanda Picó ◽  
Marisa Lopez Teijón ◽  
Juan G. Álvarez ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lorán ◽  
S. Bayarri ◽  
P. Conchello ◽  
A. Herrera

Food Fights ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 189-207
Author(s):  
Amy Bentley

In the nineteenth century, before the rise of commercial baby food, nearly all infants were breastfed exclusively for most of their first year. By 1950, most infants were eating solid food before two months of age, and that food was increasingly made by companies, not parents. At first, commercial baby food was the same as canned food for adults, just in smaller jars. But in the 1970s, when parents rebelled against “canned food taste,” baby food manufacturers responded by offering more variety and less salt and sugar. Today, age of first solid food and choice of baby food vary widely. When and what babies eat, argues Amy Bentley, mirrors our larger debates about nutrition, diet, and the morality of commercial versus home-made food.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document