COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH MEASUREMENT METHODS

1989 ◽  
pp. 382-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Aastroem ◽  
H. Hansen
1987 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Nakata ◽  
Yoshihiro Kawase ◽  
Masanori Nakano

2015 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 285-290
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Tychko

Photoinduced nucleation in an external magnetic field is investigated. A possibility of a week magnetic field strength measurement is showed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1006-1007 ◽  
pp. 849-852
Author(s):  
Rui Fen Hou ◽  
Zhi Gao Zhang ◽  
Lu Dai ◽  
Wen Jie Gong ◽  
An Li Lin

The current method is presented to calibrate the constant of Helmholtz coils. Two measurement methods of magnetic field strength are proposed and compared. In order to improve the accuracy, the influence of geomagnetic field is eliminated by changing direction of the magnetic field of Helmholtz coils. When the magnetic field strength is measured by Guassmeter, the calibration uncertainty is 0.12% (k=2). When the magnetic field strength is measured by Fluxmeter and search coil, the calibration uncertainty is 0.30% (k=2).


1976 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 613-622
Author(s):  
I.A. Aslanov ◽  
Yu.S. Rustamov

SummaryMeasurements of the radial velocities and magnetic field strength of β CrB were carried out. It is shown that there is a variability with the rotation period different for various elements. The curve of the magnetic field variation measured from lines of 5 different elements: FeI, CrI, CrII, TiII, ScII and CaI has a complex shape specific for each element. This may be due to the presence of magnetic spots on the stellar surface. A comparison with the radial velocity curves suggests the presence of a least 4 spots of Ti and Cr coinciding with magnetic spots. A change of the magnetic field with optical depth is shown. The curve of the Heffvariation with the rotation period is given. A possibility of secular variations of the magnetic field is shown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document