CT-based response assessment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Dual energy CT provides a more predictive imaging biomarker of clinical benefit than RECIST or Choi criteria

2013 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Meyer ◽  
P. Hohenberger ◽  
P. Apfaltrer ◽  
T. Henzler ◽  
D.J. Dinter ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. FSO676
Author(s):  
Saurav Verma ◽  
Rohit Reddy ◽  
Sheragaru Hanumanthappa Chandrashekhara ◽  
Shamim Ahmed Shamim ◽  
Sarthak Tripathy ◽  
...  

The therapeutic landscape in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor has evolved. Avapritinib and ripretinib have now been approved by the US FDA for platelet-derived growth factor alpha D842V-mutant and refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients, respectively. Here we report five patients who have been on avapritinib under an expanded access program. Response assessment was available for four patients – a partial response in two patients and stable disease in one, while one patient had progressive disease. Though preliminary results of the VOYAGER trial have shown less activity of avapritinib and no significant difference in progression-free survival when compared with regorafenib, avapritinib may show some clinical benefit in a subset of patients refractory to approved therapies. We share our experience of five cases, with clinical benefit in three. We believe avapritinib should be further evaluated in clinical trials.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Sawaki ◽  
Tatsuo Kanda ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Toshirou Nishida

Purpose. This retrospective, nonrandomized study investigated the effect of imatinib rechallenge plus best supportive care (BSC) on overall survival after imatinib and sunitinib treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).Methods. Twenty-six patients who had previously been exposed to both imatinib and sunitinib were enrolled in this study. The treatment regimen was BSC with or without imatinib, based on the patient’s choice after discussion with his or her physician. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were time to treatment failure, clinical response rate assessed by Choi criteria, and safety.Results. Fourteen patients were treated with imatinib plus BSC and 12 received BSC alone. Median overall survival was greatly improved for the imatinib group, although differences were not significant (22 months for imatinib plus BSC versus 4 months for BSC;P=0.058). Three patients (21%) had a clinical response in the imatinib group, and one had a clinical response in the BSC alone group. Imatinib was well tolerated.Conclusions. Rechallenge with imatinib may be associated with improvement in overall survival without deteriorating performance status in patients who failed imatinib and sunitinib. A prospective study should be considered to confirm the efficacy of rechallenge with imatinib.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document