scholarly journals PRM230 - A SIMPLE NEW METHOD FOR COMBINING BINOMIAL COUNTS OR PROPORTIONS WITH HAZARD RATIOS FOR EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS OF TIME-TO-EVENT DATA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S395
Author(s):  
CL Watkins ◽  
I Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
New Method ◽  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Hazard Ratios

scholarly journals Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Baum ◽  
Sangita Kulathinal ◽  
Kari Auranen
Keyword(s):  
False Positive ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Vaccine Effectiveness ◽  
Partial Likelihood ◽  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Positive Events ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Positive Rate

Abstract Background Non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes in time-to-event data affects event counts as well as the risk sets, thus, biasing the estimation of hazard ratios. We investigate how imperfect observation of incident events affects the estimation of vaccine effectiveness based on hazard ratios. Methods Imperfect time-to-event data contain two classes of events: a portion of the true events of interest; and false-positive events mistakenly recorded as events of interest. We develop an estimation method utilising a weighted partial likelihood and probabilistic deletion of false-positive events and assuming the sensitivity and the false-positive rate are known. The performance of the method is evaluated using simulated and Finnish register data. Results The novel method enables unbiased semiparametric estimation of hazard ratios from imperfect time-to-event data. False-positive rates that are small can be approximated to be zero without inducing bias. The method is robust to misspecification of the sensitivity as long as the ratio of the sensitivity in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is specified correctly and the cumulative risk of the true event is small. Conclusions The weighted partial likelihood can be used to adjust for outcome measurement errors in the estimation of hazard ratios and effectiveness but requires specifying the sensitivity and the false-positive rate. In absence of exact information about these parameters, the method works as a tool for assessing the potential magnitude of bias given a range of likely parameter values.

Feasibility and reliability of using hazard ratios in meta-analyses of published time-to-event data

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (S3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne Tierney ◽  
Larysa Rydzewska ◽  
Sarah Burdett ◽  
Lesley Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Meta Analyses

scholarly journals Using Median Survival in Meta-analysis of Experimental Time-to-event Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore C Hirst ◽  
Emily S. Sena ◽  
Malcolm R. Macleod
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Preclinical Research ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Meta Regression

Abstract Background: Time-to-event data is frequently reported in both clinical and preclinical research spheres. Systematic review and meta-analysis is a tool that can help to identify pitfalls in preclinical research conduct and reporting that can help to improve translational efficacy. However, pooling of studies using hazard ratios (HR) is cumbersome especially in preclinical meta-analyses including large numbers of small studies. Median survival is a much simpler metric although because of some limitations, which may not apply to preclinical data, it is generally not used in survival meta-analysis. We aimed to appraise its performance when compared with hazard ratio-based meta-analysis when pooling large numbers of small, imprecise studies.Methods: We simulated a survival dataset with features representative of a typical preclinical survival meta-analysis, including with influence of a treatment and a number of covariates. We calculated individual patient data-based hazard ratios and median survival ratios (MSR), comparing the summary statistics directly and their performance at Random-effects meta-analysis. Finally, we compared their sensitivity to detect associations between treatment and influential covariates at meta-regression.Results: There was in imperfect correlation between MSR and HR, although opposing direction of treatment effects between summary statistics appeared not to be a major issue. Precision was more conservative for HR than MSR, meaning that estimates of heterogeneity were lower. There was a slight sensitivity advantage for MSR at meta-analysis and meta-regression, although power was low in all circumstances.Conclusions: MSR appears to be a valid summary statistic for use in meta-analysis of small, imprecise experimental studies. It is computationally more straightforward and quicker to approximate than HR. While assessment of study precision and therefore weighting is less reliable, MSR appears to perform favourably during meta-analysis. Sensitivity of meta-regression was low for this set of parameters, so pooling of treatments to increase sample size may be required to ensure confidence in preclinical survival meta-regressions.

scholarly journals Using median survival in meta-analysis of experimental time-to-event data

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore C. Hirst ◽  
Emily S. Sena ◽  
Malcolm R. Macleod
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Preclinical Research ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Meta Regression

Abstract Background Time-to-event data is frequently reported in both clinical and preclinical research spheres. Systematic review and meta-analysis is a tool that can help to identify pitfalls in preclinical research conduct and reporting that can help to improve translational efficacy. However, pooling of studies using hazard ratios (HRs) is cumbersome especially in preclinical meta-analyses including large numbers of small studies. Median survival is a much simpler metric although because of some limitations, which may not apply to preclinical data, it is generally not used in survival meta-analysis. We aimed to appraise its performance when compared with hazard ratio-based meta-analysis when pooling large numbers of small, imprecise studies. Methods We simulated a survival dataset with features representative of a typical preclinical survival meta-analysis, including with influence of a treatment and a number of covariates. We calculated individual patient data-based hazard ratios and median survival ratios (MSRs), comparing the summary statistics directly and their performance at random-effects meta-analysis. Finally, we compared their sensitivity to detect associations between treatment and influential covariates at meta-regression. Results There was an imperfect correlation between MSR and HR, although the opposing direction of treatment effects between summary statistics appeared not to be a major issue. Precision was more conservative for HR than MSR, meaning that estimates of heterogeneity were lower. There was a slight sensitivity advantage for MSR at meta-analysis and meta-regression, although power was low in all circumstances. Conclusions We believe we have validated MSR as a summary statistic for use in a meta-analysis of small, imprecise experimental survival studies—helping to increase confidence and efficiency in future reviews in this area. While assessment of study precision and therefore weighting is less reliable, MSR appears to perform favourably during meta-analysis. Sensitivity of meta-regression was low for this set of parameters, so pooling of treatments to increase sample size may be required to ensure confidence in preclinical survival meta-regressions.

scholarly journals Assessing and improving the reliability of meta-analyses of hazard ratios derived from published time-to-event data

Trials ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. O93
Author(s):  
Jayne Tierney ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
Sarah Burdett ◽  
Lesley Stewart ◽  
Mahesh Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Meta Analyses

Approximate Bayesian inference for joint linear and partially linear modeling of longitudinal zero-inflated count and time to event data

2021 ◽  
pp. 096228022110028
Author(s):  
T Baghfalaki ◽  
M Ganjali
Keyword(s):  
Linear Model ◽  
Joint Modeling ◽  
Partially Linear Model ◽  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Partially Linear ◽  
Time To Event Data ◽  
Count Response ◽  
Approximate Bayesian

Joint modeling of zero-inflated count and time-to-event data is usually performed by applying the shared random effect model. This kind of joint modeling can be considered as a latent Gaussian model. In this paper, the approach of integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) is used to perform approximate Bayesian approach for the joint modeling. We propose a zero-inflated hurdle model under Poisson or negative binomial distributional assumption as sub-model for count data. Also, a Weibull model is used as survival time sub-model. In addition to the usual joint linear model, a joint partially linear model is also considered to take into account the non-linear effect of time on the longitudinal count response. The performance of the method is investigated using some simulation studies and its achievement is compared with the usual approach via the Bayesian paradigm of Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC). Also, we apply the proposed method to analyze two real data sets. The first one is the data about a longitudinal study of pregnancy and the second one is a data set obtained of a HIV study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document