Domain state model for exchange bias: thickness dependence of diluted antiferromagnetic Co1−yO on exchange bias in Co/CoO

2002 ◽  
Vol 240 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 248-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Beschoten ◽  
J. Keller ◽  
P. Miltényi ◽  
G. Güntherodt
2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Keller ◽  
P. Miltényi ◽  
B. Beschoten ◽  
G. Güntherodt ◽  
U. Nowak ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 7269-7271 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Nowak ◽  
A. Misra ◽  
K. D. Usadel

2007 ◽  
pp. 419-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Beschoten ◽  
Andrea Tillmanns ◽  
Jan Keller ◽  
Gernot Güntherodt ◽  
Ulrich Nowak ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Biternas ◽  
U. Nowak ◽  
R. W. Chantrell

2002 ◽  
Vol 746 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Nowak ◽  
A. Misra ◽  
K. D. Usadel

ABSTRACTThe domain state model for exchange bias consists of a ferromagnetic layer exchange coupled to an antiferromagnetic layer. In order to model a certain degree of disorder within the bulk of the antiferromagnet, the latter is diluted throughout its volume. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations of the model were performed in the past. Exchange bias is observed as a result of a domain state in the antiferromagnetic layer which develops during the initial field cooling, carrying a remanent domains state magnetization which is partly irreversible during hysteresis. A variety of typical effects associated with exchange bias like, e. g., its dependence on dilution, positive bias, temperature and time dependences as well as the dependence on the thickness of the antiferromagnetic layer can be explained within this model.


2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Nowak ◽  
K. D. Usadel ◽  
J. Keller ◽  
P. Miltényi ◽  
B. Beschoten ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 675-677 ◽  
pp. 1263-1266
Author(s):  
Jian Wang ◽  
Shinji Muraishi ◽  
Ji Shi ◽  
Yoshio Nakamura

We have used ferromagnet/antiferromagnet/ferromagnet sandwich structure to probe the antiferromagnetic layer thickness dependence of exchange bias in sputter-deposited Co/CoO/Co trilayer. The exchange coupling occurring at the upper ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic interface is always found to be stronger than the one at the lower antiferromagnetic/ferromagnetic interface. The grain growth with increasing antiferromagnetic layer thickness can lead to a gradient of grain size distribution through the whole antiferromagnetic layer. Consequently, the relatively large grains at the upper interface would results in a rougher interface which we treat as structural defects and can significantly enhance exchange bias through domain state model. The slightly decrease of exchange coupling with increasing antiferromgnetic layer thickness indicates that the exchange bias is only governed by the grains that are thermally stable but whose anisotropy energy is low enough to be set.


2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 2744-2746 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Beschoten ◽  
J. Keller ◽  
A. Tillmanns ◽  
G. Guntherodt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document