CS03-04 - Concept of somatoform disorder

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1777-1777
Author(s):  
H.-P. Kapfhammer

Patients presenting with bodily symptoms and complaints that are not sufficiently explained by organic pathology or well known pathophysiological mechanisms present a major challenge to any health delivery system. From a perspective of psychiatric classification these medically unexplained somatic symptoms may be diagnosed as primary psychiatric disorders such as depressive and anxiety disorders on the one hand, as somatoform disorders on the other. Among medical specialties a separate diagnostic approach is taken to conceptualize functional somatic syndromes. Unfortunately, both diagnostic systems do not conform to each other very well.The concept of somatoform disorders as outlined in DSM-III to DSM-IV-TR and in ICD-10 refers to a group of heterogeneous disorders with prominent somatic symptoms or special body-focussed anxieties, or convictions of illness. These disorders seem to indicate medical conditions that cannot, however, fully be explained either in terms of medical diagnostics or of other primary psychiatric disorders. There is one major conceptual assumption that postulates a decisive impact of psychosocial stress on the origin, onset and/or course of these somatic symptoms and complaints. And there is one major path of diagnostic steps to be taken, i.e. just to count the number of medically unexplained somatic symptoms, to determine their reference to any main organ system, to prove that they are not self-induced, to put special stress on prevailing pain symptoms and to separately assess dominant health anxieties or illness convictions.Since introduction of the diagnostic concept of somatoform disorders there have been arising many critical issues regarding the soundness of this diagnostic category. These issues, among other things, refer to a problematic mind-body dichotomy overemphasizing psychosocial and psychological factors and neglecting major neurobiological processes, to the impracticable criterion of “medically unexplained”, to the demand of conceptual clarity and coherence of this diagnostic category, to the rather trivial diagnostic procedure of just counting the number of medically unexplained somatic symptoms whereas not assessing typical dimensions of illness behaviour in a corresponding way, to the major overlap between subgroups of somatoform disorders on the one hand and factitious disorders, anxiety disorders and depressive disorders on the other, to a principal focus on the epidemiologically rare condition of somatisation disorder as core disorder thereby undervaluing much more prevalent subthreshold conditions, to the difficult communication of the whole diagnostic group to medical colleagues dealing with the same problems by using a different conceptual approach, however.These critical issues surrounding the concept of somatoform disorder will be reflected in respect of some major revisions projected in future diagnostic classification systems of DSM-V and ICD-11.

Author(s):  
I. Kukhtevich

Functional autonomic disorders occupy a significant part in the practice of neurologists and professionals of other specialties as well. However, there is no generally accepted classification of such disorders. In this paper the authors tried to show that functional autonomic pathology corresponds to the concept of somatoform disorders combining syndromes manifested by visceral, borderline psychopathological, neurological symptoms that do not have an organic basis. The relevance of the problem of somatoform disorders is that on the one hand many health professionals are not familiar enough with manifestations of borderline neuropsychiatric disorders, often forming functional autonomic disorders, and on the other hand they overestimate somatoform symptoms that are similar to somatic diseases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 268 ◽  
pp. 108-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madelon M.E. Riem ◽  
Emmy N.E.M. Doedée ◽  
Suzanne C. Broekhuizen-Dijksman ◽  
Eugenie Beijer

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 1065-1072
Author(s):  
R. Jansman ◽  
M. M. E. Riem ◽  
S. Broekhuizen-Dijksman ◽  
C. Veth ◽  
E. Beijer ◽  
...  

AbstractMentalization deficits and disturbances in emotional functioning may contribute to somatization in patients with medically unexplained somatic symptoms (MUSS). The present study aimed to increase understanding the psychological factors that contribute to somatization by examining associations between attachment, crying attitudes and behavior, and somatic symptoms in these patients. Attachment security was measured with the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire in sixty-eight outpatients diagnosed with MUSS. Somatic symptom severity was measured with the RAND-36, crying frequency, and attitudes with the Adult Crying Inventory. Patients were asked to evaluate photographs of crying individuals in order to assess the perception of crying and empathic responses to crying. Attachment anxiety was significantly related to somatic symptom severity and negative attitudes toward crying. In addition, somatic symptom severity was related to a more negative attitude toward crying and less awareness of the interpersonal impact of crying on others. The association between attachment anxiety and somatic symptoms was, however, not mediated by crying or negative attitude toward crying. Neither were there significant associations between attachment, somatic symptoms, and empathic responses to crying. Altered attitudes to crying may stem from a history of insecure attachment experiences and may reflect maladaptive emotion strategies in MUSS patients.


1995 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohan Isaac ◽  
Aleksandar Janca ◽  
Kimberly Christie Burke ◽  
Jorge Alberto Costa e Silva ◽  
Stanley Wilson Acuda ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Gara ◽  
Roxanne Cohen Silver ◽  
Javier I Escobar ◽  
Alison Holman ◽  
Howard Waitzkin

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Yasaman Gheidar ◽  
Mehdi ShamiZanjani

Purpose One of the hottest topics in today’s professional and academic debates is digital transformation; some even prefer to use the term “digital business transformation” that is more in line with the business aspects of transformation. On the other hand, in today’s workplaces, human resource (HR) approaches have come into a new era named employee experience (EX). The digital employee experience (DEX), one of the outcomes of entrancing digital transformation in workplaces, has revolutionized the business world by shifting the priorities of organizations from focusing solely on the needs of managers to focusing on all the employees and their experiences in the workplace. Despite the importance of this concept, there is not a unified and complete definition for it. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to conceptualize the DEX. Design/methodology/approach In this study, a systematic literature review was conducted in academic and professional databases, and then to complete and confirm the definition, 11 academic and professional experts in the field of HR and digital transformation in the country were interviewed. Findings A definition of the DEX was provided that covers previous gaps about defining this concept. Research limitations/implications It should be noted that research on conceptualizing EX rather than DEX has been conducted on academic grounds, and in the professional world, there have been some initial attempts on conceptualizing the DEX. Therefore, this study was defined as the need to provide a definition of the DEX. Originality/value The importance of implementing the positive DEX, on the one hand, and failing to conduct comprehensive studies to understand this concept and provide a precise definition of it, on the other hand, have become critical issues in organizations.


2008 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Bong Koh ◽  
Dong Kee Kim ◽  
Shin Young Kim ◽  
Joong Kyu Park ◽  
Mooyoung Han

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Refolo

Le odierne applicazioni della medicina hanno introdotto tali e tante trasformazioni nell’atto procreativo umano, da rendere plausibile l’idea che sia in corso una sorta di “rivoluzione riproduttiva”. Tra le problematiche risultanti delle trasformazioni in atto vi è, per un verso, un effetto involutivo sulla generazione umana, nel senso che esse hanno ridotto o rischiano di ridurre l’“evento” rappresentato dalla nascita a mero “fatto biologico”, di “avvicinare” pericolosamente i meccanismi che la regalano a quelli della riproduzione animale e di rendere “superflua”, nel processo generativo, l’integrazione affettivo-morale tra due persone, che poi è quel che qualifica più specificatamente il riprodursi umano. Per altro verso, vi sono una serie di mutamenti nella scena sociale concernenti l’atteggiamento che l’adulto ha nei confronti dei nuovi nati e lo “statuto simbolico” del figlio, la cui immagine è sempre meno associabile a nozioni quali “ospite”, “dono” “frutto”, “benedizione” e sempre associabile a quella di “desiderio” da soddisfare a tutti costi. Il contributo tenta un approfondimento di queste criticità. ---------- Medicine applications have changed human procreation to the point that the idea of a sort of “reproductive revolution” is plausible. Among the issues resulting from these changes, we have to consider, on the one hand, the regressive effect on human generation, in the sense that they have reduced or may reduce birth “event” into mere “biological fact”, to “approximate” dangerously its mechanisms to animal reproduction and to make “unnecessary” emotional integration among people, that is what qualifies more specifically human reproduction, within human generative processes. On the other hand, several changes in the social scene regarding adult’s attitude towards new born and the “symbolic status” of the child, whose image is less and less associated to notions such as “guest” “gift”, “fruit”, “blessing” and more and more associated to “desire” to win at all costs. The contribution intends to debate these critical issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document