E pluribus unum: plural logic and set theory

2009 ◽  
pp. 104-134
Author(s):  
John P. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Linnebo
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 267-296
Author(s):  
Salvatore Florio ◽  
Øystein Linnebo

This chapter develops and motivates an alternative, more critical plural logic, thus exploring the third horn of the trilemma from the previous chapter. First, a liberal view of mathematical definitions is defended, according to which any objects can be used to define a set. This entails that the traditional plural comprehension scheme needs to be restricted. Some successor principles are then formulated on the basis of the idea that any plurality needs to be circumscribed. Finally, the resulting critical plural logic is shown to give rise to a natural and elegant approach to set theory.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN P. BURGESS
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 54-75
Author(s):  
Salvatore Florio ◽  
Øystein Linnebo

What is the relation between some things and their set? This chapter begins with a formal comparison of plural logic and set theory, which clarifies an important technical aspect of the question. The chapter then turns to more philosophical issues, investigating whether pluralities should be eliminated in favor of sets or vice versa. Both attempted eliminations are rejected in favor of a view, inspired by Cantor, that retains both pluralities and sets, using the former to provide a metaphysical account of the latter.


Author(s):  
Ernest Schimmerling
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Daniel W. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document