These observations, made at Alten in lat. 69° 58' 3" N., and 23° 43' 10" east of Paris, would seem to have a claim to the attention of the Royal Society, as they offer the
experimentum crucis
of Professor Forbes’s empirical formula respecting the gradual diminution of the daily oscillations of the barometer, within certain limit hours, from the equator to the poles. Professor Forbes has laid down an assumed curve, in which the diurnal oscillation amounts to ·1190 at the equator and 0 in lat. 64° 8' N., and
beyond that latitude
the tide should occur
with a contrary sign
, plus becoming minus. Now Alten being nearly in lat. 70°, if Professor Forbes’s law hold good, the maxima of the diurnal oscillations should occur at the hour for the minima at the equator, and a similar inversion should take place with respect to the minima. Mr. Thomas has himself however modified the value his observations would otherwise have had, by adopting 2 p. m., instead of 3 p. m., for the hour of his observations for the fall; and he has adapted his barometrical observations to a mean temperature of 50° Fahr., instead of 32°. The first year’s observations commence on the 1st October, 1837, and terminate on the 30th September, 1838. The barometer stood 66 feet 5 inches above low-water mark, and the thermometer hung at 6 feet above the ground; but care was not always taken to prevent the sun shining on it. The mean height of the barometer for the year was 29°·771, and the mean of the thermometer almost coincident with the freezing point, viz., 32°·017.The maximum height of the barometer was 30°·89 in January, and the minimum 28°·71 in October. The mean of the barometer at 9 a .m. was 29°·764, therm. 33°·455; at 2 p. m. 29°·765, therm. 33°·327; and at 9 p. m. 29°·784, therm. 29°·270. The diurnal observations would seem to support Professor Forbes’s theory; but the 9 p. m. observations are entirely opposed to it, as they appear with the same maximum sign as at the equator, whereas the sign ought to have been the reverse; indeed, with respect to the diurnal observations, the mean of five months of the year at 9 a. m. gives a plus sign, although the mean of the year at 2 p. m. only gives the trifling quantity of ·001 plus. There is one remarkable feature in these observations that cannot fail to strike the meteorologist. M. Arago, from nine years observations at Paris, reduced to the level of the sea, makes the annual mean height 29°·9546; twenty-one years’ observations at Madras make it 29°·958; and three years’ observations at Calcutta, by Mr. James Prinsep, make it 29°·764; and Mr. Thomas brings out 29°·771. That there should be this coincidence between the observations at Calcutta and Alten is curious. Neither Mr. Thomas nor Mr. Prinsep state whether or not their means are reduced to the level of the sea. It is to be suspected they are not.