Crisis Call Outcome Rating Scale

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Bonneson ◽  
Don M. Hartsough
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Crisis Call ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

Development of the Crisis Call Outcome Rating Scale.

1987 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 612-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Bonneson ◽  
Don M. Hartsough
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Crisis Call ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

scholarly journals Validation of the French Versions of Two Brief,Clinician-friendly Outcome Monitoring Tools: The ORS and SRS.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Cazauvieilh ◽  
Kamel Gana ◽  
Scott D Miller ◽  
Bruno Quintard
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Relationship ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Routine Outcome Monitoring ◽  
Factorial Structure ◽  
Monitoring Tools ◽  
Outcome Monitoring ◽  
Session Rating Scale ◽  
French Validation ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

<b>French Validation of two brief Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM)</b> scales <b>from the PCOMS system</b> : the <b>ORS</b> (Outcome Rating Scale, Miller et al., 2005) <b>designed to assess </b>various dimensions of <b>well-being and progression during care</b>, and the <b>SRS</b> (Session Rating Scale 3.0; Miller et al., 2002) <b>designed to assess dimensions of the therapeutic relationship</b>. <b>The research implied clinical and non clinical populations</b> <b>and brings estimates</b> <b>regarding</b> factorial structure, validity, reliability, preliminary index and norms of <b>the two scales in French.</b>

scholarly journals The Child Outcome Rating Scale: validating a four-item measure of psychosocial functioning in community and clinic samples of children aged 10–15

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1089-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polly Casey ◽  
Praveetha Patalay ◽  
Jessica Deighton ◽  
Scott D. Miller ◽  
Miranda Wolpert
Keyword(s):  
Psychosocial Functioning ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Child Outcome ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

Improving Youth Mental Health Services Access Using a Single-Session Therapy Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-55
Author(s):  
Maureen Kachor ◽  
Joanne Brothwell
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Wait Times ◽  
Single Session ◽  
Therapy Services ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

This article describes the implementation and evaluation of a single-session therapy (SST) pilot project in a youth community-based mental health clinic. The intent was to improve access to therapy services in order to reduce wait times, support youth's and their caregivers’ functioning, relieve immediate distress and connect youth to resources while waiting for ongoing therapy. Wait times were reduced by 90 days when SST was implemented following intake. Caregivers reported clinically significant improvement in adolescent well-being at one-month follow-up using the Outcome Rating Scale. Clinicians embraced the implementation of SST as a complementary service to multisession therapy in the clinic setting.

De Child outcome rating scale (C-ORS) en deChild session rating scale (C-SRS)

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Boon ◽  
Sjouk De Boer ◽  
Emmeline Ravestijn
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Child Outcome ◽  
Session Rating Scale ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

scholarly journals Posterior Endoscope-Assisted Diskectomy Is an Effective Technique for Cervical Soft Disk Herniation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Gündoğdu Karaoglu ◽  
Omer Polat ◽  
Ozhan Merzuk Uckun ◽  
Resul Karadeniz ◽  
Deniz Belen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Disk Herniation ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Cervical Disk Herniation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale ◽  
Soft Disk ◽  
Cervical Disk

Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinicoradiologic conditions of patients with a herniated cervical disk who were treated with percutaneous endoscope-assisted cervical diskectomy. Materials and Methods The medical data of 27 patients (16 men and 11 women; mean age: 40.9 years) who were operated on with the posterior endoscope-assisted cervical diskectomy method were reviewed retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 35.1 months, and the patients were assessed with combined preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), Prolo Functional Economic Outcome Rating scale, MacNab scale, and clinical imaging. Results The mean preoperative VAS level was 8.6 (range: 7–10), and mean Prolo score was 2.5 (range: 2–5). A postoperative assessment performed 1 week postsurgery found a mean VAS level of 2.1 (range: 0–4). At the final examination, the mean VAS level was 0.81 (range: 0–3), and the mean Prolo score was 4.5 (range: 3–5). The final MacNab scale scores were 62.9%, excellent; 25.9%, good; 7.4%, moderate; and 3.7%, poor. Conclusion Percutaneous endoscope-assisted cervical diskectomy is a suitable and effective treatment method for soft cervical disk herniation.

scholarly journals Casting a wider net in behavioral health screening in primary care: a preliminary study of the Outcome Rating Scale

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian DeSantis ◽  
Miranda J. Jackson ◽  
Barry L. Duncan ◽  
Robert J. Reese
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Medical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Health ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale ◽  
Brief Screening

Introduction The integration of behavioral health services into primary care has led to enhanced use of brief screening measures to identify mental health problems. Although useful, such instruments are largely symptom based and diagnosis specific. This narrow focus can potentially limit the identification of broader social or relational distress in patients that affect medical outcomes, as well as present feasibility challenges using a multi-measure approach in identifying mental health comorbidities. Method This exploratory study of adult primary care patients compared an ultra-brief, and widely used measure of global distress across life functioning, the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS), with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2). Results Correlations between the ORS and the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 indicated agreement between the measures in classifying patients, and the ORS identified significantly more patients in the clinical range. Discussion Although results are preliminary, the ORS may cast a wider net in identifying patients with significant distress in primary care.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF INDIVIDUALIZED APPROACH FOR PHYSIOTHERAPY OF CHRONIC SHOULDER PAIN AND PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING IN ELITE ATHLETES WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2020) ◽  
pp. 91-106
Author(s):  
Martin Eremiev ◽  
◽  
Bobi Krumov ◽  
Irena Lyudmilova ◽  
Nadezhda Popova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Scratch Test ◽  
Shoulder Girdle ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Wheelchair Athletes ◽  
Shoulder Flexion ◽  
The Right ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale ◽  
Chronic Shoulder Pain

ABSTRACT Objective: Тo study the potential effectiveness of individual physiotherapy program for wheelchair athletes with shoulder girdle persistent pain and dysfunctions. Materials and methods: Thirteen athletes, members of the Bulgarian National Teams in wheelchair basketball and track and field athletics, with mean age 40.6 ± 10.9 participated in the study. The studied athletes had had a history of persistent pain and shoulder girdle dysfunctions for more than 6 months. Individual physiotherapy programs were applied to the participants for a period of two weeks. The selection of techniques was based on the initial assessment and evaluation. The participants were evaluated before treatment, after the first week of treatment, and at the end of the period with the use of the following specific questionnaires and tests: Goniometry of shoulder flexion and horizontal adduction, Apley’s Scratch test, Active compression test of O’Brien (ACT), Athletic shoulder outcome rating scale and Wheelchair User’s Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). Results: Post-treatment effects demonstrated a significant (p<0.05) increase in shoulder flexion (14.6° for the right and 12.7° for the left) and horizontal adduction (21.9° for the right and 18.8° for the left). A corresponding increase in the scores for the Athletic shoulder outcome rating scale was found with 10.92 points difference to the initial score (p<0.05). The WUSPI demonstrated a non-significant improvement of 0.69 points. The results of ACT and Apley scratch test showed a non-significant decrease of 23.1% for the right shoulder and, 15.4% decrease for the left shoulder after 7 days of treatment. Those results remained unchanged in post-treatment testing. Conclusion: This study showed that the individual physiotherapy programs are effective in the management of wheelchair athletes with chronic shoulder pain. The involvement of Mulligan’s manual therapy techniques combined with other types of exercises for the shoulder and the trunk are beneficial for wheelchair athletes with chronic shoulder pain.

scholarly journals Spanish Versions of the Outcome Rating Scale and the Session Rating Scale: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Andrade-González ◽  
Irene Rodrigo-Holgado ◽  
Jesús Fernández-Rozas ◽  
Pablo F. Cáncer ◽  
Guillermo Lahera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Reliable Change Index ◽  
Outcome Monitoring ◽  
Session Rating Scale ◽  
Outcome Rating Scale

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) uses standardized measures to both track and inform mental health service delivery. Use of ROM has been shown to improve the outcome of psychotherapy when applied to different types of patients. The present research was designed to determine the reliability and validity of the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and the Session Rating Scale (SRS) in a sample of Spanish patients. After a controlled process of translation into the Spanish that is spoken and written in Spain (i.e., in Europe, as distinct from, e.g., Latin American Spanish), both measures were completed by patients of an outpatient mental health unit during eight sessions of psychotherapy. Sixty mental health patients filled out the ORS and 59 the SRS. In addition, the ORS was completed by 33 people who constituted the non-clinical sample. The cut-off of the ORS was 24.52 points, and the Reliable Change Index (RCI) was 9.15 points. ORS and SRS scores exhibited excellent internal consistency. The temporal stability of the SRS was adequate. The convergent and discriminant validity of the two measures were adequate. Regarding the factorial validity of the ORS and the SRS, in the third psychotherapy session, confirmatory factor analyses evidenced the existence of a unifactorial model. The predictive validity of SRS was acceptable. The ORS was sensitive to changes in patients’ symptoms. In conclusion, compared to the original English versions of the ORS and SRS measures, the Spanish versions of the measures are also reliable and valid.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document