Transpiration and leaf water potentials of wheat in relation to changing soil water potential

1977 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 355 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Seaton ◽  
JJ Landsberg ◽  
RH Sedgley
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Transpiration Rate ◽  
Water Conservation ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Stomatal Resistance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Potentials

Changes in the transpiration rate of wheat in drying soils were followed in experiments in which plants were grown in two small weighable lysimeters in a glasshouse. Hourly measurements of soil water potential (Ψs) were made at three depths in each lysimeter. The water potential of flag leaves was measured with a pressure chamber, and stomatal resistance with a pressure drop porometer. Data on root densities and distribution were also obtained. Transpiration rates fell below estimated potential levels when the average value of Ψs in the root zone was reduced to –1 to –5 bars, depending on soil storage, root distribution and potential transpiration rate. From this point Ψs fell rapidly in the surface layers, more slowly at depth. It was found that accurate calculations of daily water uptake could be made from changes in soil water content. The minimum value of leaf water potential (�1 )attained each day declined progressively through the drying cycle, but there was evidence that stomatal resistance (rs) is not uniquely related to Ψ1; initial stomatal closure occurred at Ψ1, values which decreased from –11 to –25 bars as drying progressed. This adaptive mechanism is related to changes in osmotic potential of the leaves. Whole plant resistances (Rp), derived from leaf water potentials and fluxes through individual stems, increased as stem populations increased. In the high population lysimeter Rp decreased from 300 to 100 bar sec mm-3 as canopy transpiration rates increased from 1.5 to 4.5 x 10-4 mm sec-1. In the low population lysimeter Rp decreased from 70 to 30 bar sec mm-3 as transpiration increased from about 2.2 to 4.5 x 10-4 mm sec-1. The higher resistances appear to confer significant advantages in terms of water conservation and adaptation to drought.

Soil and plant resistance effects on transpirational and leaf water responses by groundnut to soil water potential

Soil Research ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
RP Samui ◽  
S Kar
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Plant Resistance ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Arachis Hypogea ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Soil Water Conditions

The phasic and diurnal leaf water potential (�L) and transpirational responses to soil water potential by groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) were investigated under controlled soil water conditions in a glasshouse. Three different soil water potentials (�s) in the tensiometric ranges were maintained in a lateritic sandy loam soil (Oxisol) during the seedling (S1), branching (S2) and peg formation (S3) stages of groundnut. Measured values of �s, �L rooting density, soil capillary conductivity and transpiration rate were used to calculate the soil and plant resistances to water uptake by the plant. The soil and plant resistances to water uptake by the groundnut plant increased appreciably as the soil water potential decreased from -0.11 to -0.70 bar. Plant resistance (Rp) was two to three orders of magnitude higher than soil resistance (Rs). Rs decreased with growth of the plant, whereas Rp increased, especially at -0.7 bar �s, Decreases in transpiration at �s lower than -0.33 bar were closely associated with the increases in the plant and soil resistances, and with lower leaf water potentials.

Soil Water Potential and Bromacil Uptake by Wheat

Weed Science ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Schreiber ◽  
V. V. Volk ◽  
L. Boersma
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Transpiration Rate ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Silt Loam ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Application Rates

The uptake of14C labeled bromacil [5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil] by wheat plants (Triticum aestivumL. ‘Gaines’) grown in a Woodburn silt loam was studied at soil water potentials of −0.35 and −2.50 bars, and in solutions containing 2.0 and 4.5μg/ml bromacil. Transpiration rate, shoot and root dry weight, and bromacil content were measured as a function of time. Bromacil uptake into the root and foliar portions of the wheat plants increased with time. At the low bromacil concentration, 70%, and at the high concentration, 42%, more bromacil was taken up by the plant at the higher soil water potential. Uptake of bromacil increased concurrently with increased transpiration of water. The bromacil concentration in the transpiration stream was greater at the −0.35 bar than at the −2.50 bar soil water potential at both bromacil application rates. Transpiration rates of the plants treated with bromacil were nearly the same after a 40-hr exposure at both soil water potentials. The rate of bromacil uptake and accumulation may be influenced by the effect of soil water potential on the apoplastic movement of water and solutes in the roots.

NITROGEN TRANSFORMATIONS NEAR UREA IN SOIL WITH DIFFERENT WATER POTENTIALS

1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
YADVINDER SINGH ◽  
E. G. BEAUCHAMP
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Incubation Period ◽  
Relative Rate ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Nitrification Inhibitor ◽  
Silt Loam ◽  
Nitrogen Transformations ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Initial Soil

Two laboratory incubation experiments were conducted to determine the effect of initial soil water potential on the transformation of urea in large granules to nitrite and nitrate. In the first experiment two soils varying in initial soil water potentials (− 70 and − 140 kPa) were incubated with 2 g urea granules with and without a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide) at 15 °C for 35 d. Only a trace of [Formula: see text] accumulated in a Brookston clay (pH 6.0) during the transformation of urea in 2 g granules. Accumulation of [Formula: see text] was also small (4–6 μg N g−1) in Conestogo silt loam (pH 7.6). Incorporation of dicyandiamide (DCD) into the urea granule at 50 g kg−1 urea significantly reduced the accumulation of [Formula: see text] in this soil. The relative rate of nitrification in the absence of DCD at −140 kPa water potential was 63.5% of that at −70 kPa (average of two soils). DCD reduced the nitrification of urea in 2 g granules by 85% during the 35-d period. In the second experiment a uniform layer of 2 g urea was placed in the center of 20-cm-long cores of Conestogo silt loam with three initial water potentials (−35, −60 and −120 kPa) and the soil was incubated at 15 °C for 45 d. The rate of urea hydrolysis was lowest at −120 kPa and greatest at −35 kPa. Soil pH in the vicinity of the urea layer increased from 7.6 to 9.1 and [Formula: see text] concentration was greater than 3000 μg g−1 soil. There were no significant differences in pH or [Formula: see text] concentration with the three soil water potential treatments at the 10th day of the incubation period. But, in the latter part of the incubation period, pH and [Formula: see text] concentration decreased with increasing soil water potential due to a higher rate of nitrification. Diffusion of various N species including [Formula: see text] was probably greater with the highest water potential treatment. Only small quantities of [Formula: see text] accumulated during nitrification of urea – N. Nitrification of urea increased with increasing water potential. After 35 d of incubation, 19.3, 15.4 and 8.9% of the applied urea had apparently nitrified at −35, −60 and −120 kPa, respectively. Nitrifier activity was completely inhibited in the 0- to 2-cm zone near the urea layer for 35 days. Nitrifier activity increased from an initial level of 8.5 to 73 μg [Formula: see text] in the 3- to 7-cm zone over the 35-d period. Nitrifier activity also increased with increasing soil water potential. Key words: Urea transformation, nitrification, water potential, large granules, nitrifier activity, [Formula: see text] production

Water relations of winter wheat. 5. The root system and osmotic adjustment in relation to crop evaporation

1984 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. McGowan ◽  
P. Blanch ◽  
P. J. Gregory ◽  
D. Haycock
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Root System ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Osmotic Adjustment ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Plant Water ◽  
Potential Evaporation ◽  
Plant Water Potential

SummaryShoot and root growth and associated leaf and soil water potential relations were compared in three consecutive crops of winter wheat grown in the same field. Despite a profuse root system the crop grown in the second drought year (1976) failed to dry the soil as throughly as the crops in 1975 and 1977. Measurements of plant water potential showed that the restricted utilization of soil water reserves by this crop was associated with failure to make any significant osmotic adjustment, leading to premature loss of leaf turgor and stomatal closure. The implications of these results for models to estimate actual crop evaporation from values of potential evaporation are discussed.

Soil water matric potential rather than water content determines drought responses in field-grown lupin (Lupinus angustifolius)

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 353 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.R. Jensen ◽  
V.O. Mogensen ◽  
H.-H. Poulsen ◽  
I.E. Henson ◽  
S. Aagot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Lupinus Angustifolius ◽  
Soil Drying ◽  
Matric Potential ◽  
Aba Content

Drought responses in leaves of lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L., cv. Polonez) were investigated in plants grown in lysimeters either in a sand or in a loam soil in the field. Abscisic acid (ABA) content, water potential (ψl) and conductance to water vapour (gH2O) were determined in leaves of both irrigated plants and in plants exposed to gradual soil drying. Amorning-peak of leaf ABA content was found in both fully watered and droughted plants. During soil drying which, on both soils types, only decreased soil water potential of the upper soil layers, mid-day leaf ABA content increased relative to that in fully irrigated plants before any appreciable decreases occurred in ψl. In the part of the soil profile from which water was taken up (0–60 cm depth), gH2O decreased when the relative available soil water content (RASW) on sand was below 12% and RASW on loam, below 30%. At this point the average soil water matric potential (ψsoil) on sand was less than –0.13 MPa and the fraction of roots in ‘wet’ soil was 0.12, while on loam, the fraction of roots in ‘wet’ soil was 0.44 while y soil was similar to that on sand. A critical leaf ABA content of 300–400 ng/g FW was associated with the onset of stomatal closure on both soil types. We suggest that the initial stomatal closure is controlled by ABA which originates from the roots where its production is closely related to ψsoiland the water potential of the root surface and that ψsoil is a more important parameter than RASW or the fraction of roots in ‘wet’ soil for affecting leaf gas exchange. Further drying on both soils led to further increases in leaf ABA and declines in ψl and gH2O. In order to gain further insight, experiments should be designed which combine signalling studies with simulation studies, which take account of soil water potential, root contact area and water flux when calculating the water status at the root surface in the soil-plant-atmosphere-continuum.

Leaf Gas Exchange and Water Relations of Lupins and Wheat. II. Root and Shoot Water Relations of Lupin During Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 415 ◽  
Author(s):  
CR Jensen ◽  
IE Henson ◽  
NC Turner
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Transport ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Water Relations ◽  
Leaf Gas Exchange ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Root Water Uptake ◽  
Leaf Conductance

Plants of Lupinus cosentinii Guss. cv. Eregulla were grown in a sandy soil in large containers in a glasshouse and exposed to drought by withholding water. Under these conditions stomatal closure had previously been shown to be initiated before a significant reduction in leaf water potential was detected. In the experiments reported here, no significant changes were found in water potential or turgor pressure of roots or leaves when a small reduction in soil water potential was induced which led to a 60% reduction in leaf conductance. The decrease in leaf conductance and root water uptake closely paralleled the fraction of roots in wet soil. By applying observed data of soil water and root characteristics, and root water uptake for whole pots in a single-root model, the average water potential at the root surface was calculated. Potential differences for water transport in the soil-plant system, and the resistances to water flow were estimated using the 'Ohm's Law' analogy for water transport. Soil resistance was negligible or minor, whereas the root resistance accounted for 61-72% and the shoot resistance accounted for about 30% of the total resistance. The validity of the measurements and calculations is discussed and the possible role of root- to-shoot communication raised.

Daily and seasonal changes of water potential in cereals

1976 ◽  
Vol 273 (927) ◽  
pp. 565-580 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Leaf Age ◽  
Stomatal Resistance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

The paper reports measurements of the water relations of a barley crop (cv. Proctor) and a winter wheat crop (cv. Maris Huntsman), grown on the same site at Sutton Bonington. Throughout the two growing seasons, days were chosen when hourly measurements could be made of leaf water potential, by means of a pressure chamber, and of stomatal resistance, by means of a diffusion porometer. Environmental factors, e.g. radiation, temperature, humidity, were recorded concurrently. Relationships between leaf water potential, stomatal resistance and environmental factors are explored and compared for the two cereals. In particular, as frequent measurements were made over two months, the influence of leaf age on responses to environmental factors can be examined. On selected days with bright sunshine and dry soil the response of both cereals to water stress is analysed with particular reference to the control of evaporation by stomatal closure

Effect of Water Stress on Stomatal Conductance and Leaf Water Relations of Leaves Along Current-Year Branches of Peach

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 549 ◽  
Author(s):  
SL Steinberg ◽  
MJ Mcfarland ◽  
JC Miller
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Stomatal Conductance ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Water Flux ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Leaf Water Status ◽  
Mature Leaves ◽  
Water Potentials

A gradation, that reflects the maturity of the leaves, exists in the leaf water, osmotic and turgor potential and stomatal conductance of leaves along current and 1-year-old branches of peach. Predawn leaf water potentials of immature folded leaves were approximately 0.24 MPa lower than mature leaves under both well-watered and dry conditions. During the daytime the leaf water potential of immature leaves reflected the water potential produced by water flux for transpiration. In well- watered trees, mature and immature unfolded leaves had a solute potential at least 0.5 MPa lower than immature folded leaves, resulting in a turgor potential that was approximately 0.8 MPa higher. The turgor requirement for growth appeared to be much less than that maintained in mature leaves. As water stress developed and leaf water potentials decreased, the osmotic potential of immature folded leaves declined to the level found in mature leaves, thus maintaining turgor. In contrast, mature leaves showed little evidence of turgor maintenance. Stomatal conductance was lower in immature leaves than in fully mature leaves. With the onset of water stress, conductance of mature leaves declined to a level near that of immature leaves. Loss of turgor in mature leaves may be a major factor in early stomatal closure. It was concluded that osmotic adjustment played a role in maintenance of a leaf water status favorable for some growth in water-stressed immature peach leaves.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document