scholarly journals Short-term variability of total column ozone from the Dobson spectrophotometer measurements at Belsk, Poland, in the period 23 March 1963–31 December 2019

Tellus B ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
J. W. Krzyścin ◽  
B. Rajewska-Więch ◽  
J. Borkowski
1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1155-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Vogel ◽  
D. Spänkuch ◽  
E. Schulz ◽  
U. Feister ◽  
W. Döhler

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves J. Rochon ◽  
Michael Sitwell ◽  
Young-Min Cho

Abstract. The impact of assimilating total column ozone datasets from single and multiple satellite data sources with and without bias correction has been examined with a version of the Environment and Climate Change Canada variational assimilation and forecasting system. The assimilated and evaluated data sources include the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 instruments on the MetOp-A and MetOp-B satellites (GOME-2A and GOME-2B), the total column ozone mapping instrument of the Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS-NM) on the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) satellite, and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) instrument on the Aura research satellite. Ground-based Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers, and filter ozonometers, as well as the Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet satellite instrument (SBUV/2), served as independent validation sources for total column ozone. Regional and global mean differences of the OMI-TOMS data with measurements from the three ground-based instrument types for the three evaluated two month periods were found to be within 1 %, except for the polar regions with the largest differences from the comparatively small dataset in Antarctica exceeding 3 %. Values from SBUV/2 summed partial columns were typically larger than OMI-TOMS on average by 0.6 to 1.2 ± 0.7 %, with smaller differences than with ground-based over Antarctica. OMI-TOMS was chosen as the reference used in the bias correction instead of the ground-based observations due to OMI’s significantly better spatial and temporal coverage and interest in near-real time assimilation. Bias corrections as a function of latitude and solar zenith angle were performed with a two-week moving window using colocation with OMI-TOMS and three variants of differences with short-term forecasts. These approaches are shown to yield residual biases of less than 1 %, with the rare exceptions associated with bins with less data. These results were compared to a time-independent bias correction estimation that used colocations as a function of ozone effective temperature and solar zenith angle which, for the time period examined, resulted in larger changes in residual biases as a function of time for some cases. Assimilation experiments for the July-August 2014 period show a reduction of global and temporal mean biases for short-term forecasts relative to ground-based Brewer and Dobson data from a maximum of about 2.3 % in the absence of bias correction to less than 0.3 % in size when bias correction is included. Both temporally averaged and time varying mean differences of forecasts with OMI-TOMS are reduced to within 1 % for nearly all cases when bias corrected observations are assimilated for the latitudes where satellite data is present. The impact of bias correction on the standard deviations and anomaly correlation coefficients of forecast differences to OMI-TOMS is noticeable but small compared to the impact of introducing any total column ozone assimilation. The assimilation of total column ozone data can result in some improvement, as well as some deterioration, in the vertical structure of forecasts when comparing to Aura-MLS and ozonesonde profiles. The most significant improvement in the vertical domain from the assimilation of total column ozone alone is seen in the anomaly correlation coefficients in the tropical lower stratosphere, which increases from a minimum of 0.1 to about 0.6. Nonetheless, it is made evident that the quality of the vertical structure is most improved when also assimilating ozone profile data, which only weakly affects the total column short-term forecasts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4425-4436
Author(s):  
Janusz W. Krzyścin ◽  
Bonawentura Rajewska-Więch ◽  
Janusz Jarosławski

Abstract. The total column ozone (TCO3) measurements by the Dobson spectrophotometer (serial no. 84) have been carried out at Belsk station (51∘50′ N, 20∘47′ E), Poland, since 23 March 1963. In total, ∼115 000 intraday manual observations were made by 31 December 2019. These observations were performed for different combinations of double wavelength pairs in the ultraviolet range and observation types, i.e., direct sun (DS), zenith blue (ZB), and zenith cloudy (ZC) depending on weather conditions. The long-term stability of the instrument was supported by frequent (almost every 4 years) intercomparisons with the world standard spectrophotometer. Trend analyses, based on the monthly and yearly averaged TCO3, can be carried out without any additional corrections to the intraday values. To adjust these data to the Brewer spectrophotometer observations, which were also performed at Belsk, a procedure is proposed to account for less accurate Dobson observations under low solar elevation, presence of clouds, and the temperature dependence of ozone absorption. The adjusted time series shows that the Brewer–Dobson monthly averaged differences are in the range of about ±0.5 %. The intraday TCO3 database, divided into three periods (1963–1979, 1980–1999, and 2000–2019), is freely available at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.919378 (Rajewska-Więch et al., 2020).


1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Spänkuch ◽  
E. Schulz

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz W. Krzyścin ◽  
Bonawentura Rajewska-Więch ◽  
Janusz Jarosławski

Abstract. The total column ozone (TCO3) measurements by the Dobson spectrophotometer #84 have been carried out at Belsk (51°50', 20°47'), Poland, since March 23, 1963. In total, ~115,000 intra-day manual observations have been taken up to December 31, 2019. These observations were made for various combinations of double wavelength pairs in UV range (AD, CD) and the observation category, i.e., direct Sun, zenith blue, and zenith cloudy depending on the weather conditions. The long-term stability of the instrument was supported by frequent (~almost every 4 yr.) intercomparisons with the world standard spectrophotometers. Trend analyses, based on the monthly and yearly averaged TCO3, can be carried out without any additional corrections to the intraday values. To adjust this data to the Brewer spectrophotometer observations also performed at Belsk, a procedure is proposed to account for: less accurate Dobson observations under low solar elevation, presence of clouds, and sensitivity of the ozone absorption on temperature. The adjusted time series shows that the Brewer-Dobson monthly averaged differences are in the range of about ±0.5 %. The intra-day TCO3 data base, divided into three periods (1963–1979, 1980–1999, and 2000–2019), is freely available at https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.919378 (Rajewska-Więch et al., 2020).


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 9431-9451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves J. Rochon ◽  
Michael Sitwell ◽  
Young-Min Cho

Abstract. Bias estimations and corrections of total column measurements are applied and evaluated with ozone data from satellite instruments providing near-real-time products during summer 2014 and 2015 and winter 2015. The developed standalone bias-correction system can be applied in near-real-time chemical data assimilation and long-term reanalysis. The instruments to which these bias corrections were applied include the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 instruments on the MetOp-A and MetOp-B satellites (GOME-2A and GOME-2B), the total column ozone mapping instrument of the Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS-NM) on the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) satellite, and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) instrument on the Aura research satellite. The OMI data set based on the TOMS version 8.5 retrieval algorithm was chosen as the reference used in the bias correction of the other satellite-based total column ozone data sets. OMI data were chosen for this purpose instead of ground-based observations due to OMI's significantly better spatial and temporal coverage, as well as interest in near-real-time assimilation. Ground-based Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers, and filter ozonometers, as well as the Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet satellite instrument (SBUV/2), served as independent validation sources of total column ozone data. Regional and global mean differences of the OMI-TOMS data with measurements from the three ground-based instrument types for the three evaluated 2-month periods were found to be within 1 %, except for the polar regions, where the largest differences from the comparatively small data set in Antarctica exceeded 3 %. Values from SBUV/2 summed partial columns were typically larger than OMI-TOMS on average by 0.6 % to 1.2 %, with smaller differences than with ground-based observations over Antarctica. Bias corrections as a function of latitude and solar zenith angle were performed for GOME-2A/B and OMPS-NM using colocation with OMI-TOMS and three variants of differences with short-term model forecasts. These approaches were shown to yield residual biases of less than 1 %, with the rare exceptions associated with bins with less data. These results were compared to a time-independent bias-correction estimation that used colocations as a function of ozone effective temperature and solar zenith angle which, for the time period examined, resulted in larger residual biases for bins whose bias varies more in time. The impact of assimilating total column ozone data from single and multiple satellite data sources with and without bias correction was examined with a version of the Environment and Climate Change Canada variational assimilation and forecasting system. Assimilation experiments for July–August 2014 show a reduction of global mean biases for short-term forecasts relative to ground-based Brewer and Dobson observations from a maximum of about 2.3 % in the absence of bias correction to less than 0.3 % in size when bias correction is included. Both temporally averaged and time-varying mean differences of forecasts with OMI-TOMS were reduced to within 1 % for nearly all cases when bias-corrected observations are assimilated for the latitudes where satellite data are present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document