Radiation dose to neonates undergoing X-ray imaging in special care baby units in Iran

2011 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Faghihi ◽  
S. Mehdizadeh ◽  
S. Sina ◽  
F. N. Alizadeh ◽  
B. Zeinali ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Nakamura ◽  
Tomoko Kobayashi ◽  
Atsushi Funatsu ◽  
Tadahisa Okada ◽  
Maria Mauti ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kim ◽  
D. Sopko ◽  
G. Toncheva ◽  
D. Enterline ◽  
B. Keijzers ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko Murakami ◽  
Toshihiko Katakura ◽  
Kenji Suzuki ◽  
Takeshi Yusa ◽  
Sinya Seino ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1331-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Kohlbrenner ◽  
K. Pallav Kolli ◽  
Andrew G. Taylor ◽  
Maureen P. Kohi ◽  
Nicholas Fidelman ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 856-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Lovric ◽  
Sébastien F. Barré ◽  
Johannes C. Schittny ◽  
Matthias Roth-Kleiner ◽  
Marco Stampanoni ◽  
...  

A basic prerequisite for in vivo X-ray imaging of the lung is the exact determination of radiation dose. Achieving resolutions of the order of micrometres may become particularly challenging owing to increased dose, which in the worst case can be lethal for the imaged animal model. A framework for linking image quality to radiation dose in order to optimize experimental parameters with respect to dose reduction is presented. The approach may find application for current and future in vivo studies to facilitate proper experiment planning and radiation risk assessment on the one hand and exploit imaging capabilities on the other.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruediger E. Schernthaner ◽  
Reham R. Haroun ◽  
Sonny Nguyen ◽  
Rafael Duran ◽  
Jae Ho Sohn ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (1079) ◽  
pp. 20170028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Harbron ◽  
Elizabeth A Ainsbury ◽  
Simon D Bouffler ◽  
Rick J Tanner ◽  
Jonathan S Eakins ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 20210153
Author(s):  
Niels Belmans ◽  
Anne Caroline Oenning ◽  
Benjamin Salmon ◽  
Bjorn Baselet ◽  
Kevin Tabury ◽  
...  

Objectives: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). Methods: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields. Results: There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children. Conclusions In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document