Comment on “A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Quality of Life of Antibiotic-only Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenhao Hu ◽  
Zhe Zhang ◽  
Feiyu Shi ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Junjun She
2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (12) ◽  
pp. 2153.e1-2153.e9
Author(s):  
Heitor B. Pansard ◽  
Mayara C. Prado ◽  
Gabriel F. Marchi ◽  
Camila S. Sfreddo ◽  
Jovito A. Skupien

Author(s):  
José-Manuel Pastora-Bernal ◽  
María-José Estebanez-Pérez ◽  
Guadalupe Molina-Torres ◽  
Francisco-José García-López ◽  
Raquel Sobrino-Sánchez ◽  
...  

COVID-19 can cause important sequels in the respiratory system and frequently presents loss of strength, dyspnea, polyneuropathies and multi-organic affectation. Physiotherapy interventions acquire a fundamental role in the recovery of the functions and the quality of life. Regarding the recovery phases after hospital discharge, the current evidence available is very preliminary. Telerehabilitation is presented as a promising complementary treatment method to standard physiotherapy. The main objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized telerehabilitation intervention after discharge from hospital for the improvement of functional capacity and quality of life compared to a program of health education and/or care in a rehabilitation center. As secondary objectives, to identify the satisfaction and perception of patients with the telerehabilitation intervention and the presence of barriers to its implementation, as well as to evaluate the cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the health system. This study protocol will be carried out through a single blind multicenter randomized clinical trial in the south of Spain. We hypothesize that the implementation of a telerehabilitation program presents results not inferior to those obtained with the current standard intervention. If the hypothesis is confirmed, it would be an opportunity to define new policies and interventions to address this disease and its consequences. Trial registration NCT04742946.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 719-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra B. Dunbar ◽  
Carolyn M. Reilly ◽  
Rebecca Gary ◽  
Melinda K. Higgins ◽  
Steven Culler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Leonice Fumiko Sato Kurebayashi ◽  
Ruth Natalia Teresa Turrini ◽  
Talita Pavarini Borges de Souza ◽  
Carolina Felicio Marques ◽  
Renata Tavares Franco Rodrigues ◽  
...  

RESUMEN Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of the auricular protocol (APPA) in reducing pain and anxiety and improving the quality of life of the nursing staff of a hospital. Method: randomized clinical trial with an initial sample of 180 professionals divided into 4 groups Control (G1), Seed (G2), Needle (G3) and Tape (G4). The evaluation instruments were the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Pain Visual Analog Scale and Quality of Life instrument, applied at the start and after five and 10 sessions (five weeks). Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Cohen's d Index were used in the analysis. Results: there was a statistical difference (p < 0.05) for anxiety according to the repeated measures ANOVA, with better results for the G3 in the final assessment (Cohen's d index 1.08/17% reduction). There was a reduction of pain of 36% in G3 and 24% in G2 and a 13% increase in the mental aspect of quality of life for the G3, although without statistical significance. Conclusion: the APPA protocol reduced the anxiety levels of nursing staff after 10 sessions. Further studies are, however, suggested with new populations and in different contexts so that the results can be confirmed. RBR-5pc43m.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document