Evaluating the Record of Different Military Interventions on Democracy – A Short- and Long-Term Analysis

2022 ◽  
pp. 5-24
Author(s):  
Marketa Jerabek
Heliyon ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e07539
Author(s):  
Azza Bejaoui ◽  
Nidhal Mgadmi ◽  
Wajdi Moussa ◽  
Tarek Sadraoui

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e44995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenjie Xu ◽  
Yuk Kee C. Poh ◽  
Isaac Roes ◽  
Eoin D. O'Cearbhaill ◽  
Mads Emil Matthiesen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Isabel Jimenez Puente ◽  
Gunnar Lian

This paper presents a full long term analysis of a TLP extreme tendon tensions using the all seas approach, and its comparison to the results estimated by the contour line approach. The analysis of the TLP tendon tension response is performed in the time domain using a coupled model where the floater is modelled in the software SIMO, while the tendon system is represented by a Finite Element Model in RIFLEX, including therefore the effects of non-linear restoring from the tendon system and bending and deformations of the tendons. The characteristic tendon tensions with q-annual probability of exceedance are estimated from a full long term analysis where both the short and long term variability are considered. These results are then compared to those obtained through the long term estimate from the contour line approach when assuming the 90th percentile for the worst sea state with q-annual probability of exceedance. The results from the full long term analysis will allow us to verify the adequate percentile level to be used with a contour line approach when estimating extreme TLP tendon tensions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (12) ◽  
pp. 9209-9234 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Anderson ◽  
A. Rueda ◽  
L. Cagigal ◽  
J. A. A. Antolinez ◽  
F. J. Mendez ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 553 ◽  
pp. 625-630
Author(s):  
Osvaldo Vallati ◽  
Fabrizio Gara ◽  
Gianluca Ranzi ◽  
Graziano Leoni

This paper presents a comparison of available numerical structural formulations for the short-and long-term analysis of composite beams with partial shear interaction. Four methods of analysis are considered and these include the finite difference method, the finite element method, the direct stiffness method and the exact analytical model. The results obtained using these formulations are compared qualitatively and their accuracy is estimated, adopting the exact analytical model as a benchmark reference with the objective of establishing the minimum spatial discretisations required to keep the error within an acceptable tolerance. These comparisons are carried out for two static configurations, i.e. simply-supported beams and propped cantilevers, from which the qualitative behaviour of these formulations in the modelling of continuous beams can also be deduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document