Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control of Vehicles Using a Resource-Efficient Communication Mechanism

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shixi Wen ◽  
Ge Guo ◽  
Bo Chen ◽  
Xiue Gao
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Communication Mechanism ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Efficient Communication

Smart Driving System for Improving Traffic Flow

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Gupta ◽  
L. N. Padhy ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Padhi
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Flow ◽  
Traffic Congestion ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Human Perception ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Driving System ◽  
V2v Communication ◽  
Traffic Conditions ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

Traffic congestion on road networks is one of the most significant problems that is faced in almost all urban areas. Driving under traffic congestion compels frequent idling, acceleration, and braking, which increase energy consumption and wear and tear on vehicles. By efficiently maneuvering vehicles, traffic flow can be improved. An Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system in a car automatically detects its leading vehicle and adjusts the headway by using both the throttle and the brake. Conventional ACC systems are not suitable in congested traffic conditions due to their response delay.  For this purpose, development of smart technologies that contribute to improved traffic flow, throughput and safety is needed. In today’s traffic, to achieve the safe inter-vehicle distance, improve safety, avoid congestion and the limited human perception of traffic conditions and human reaction characteristics constrains should be analyzed. In addition, erroneous human driving conditions may generate shockwaves in addition which causes traffic flow instabilities. In this paper to achieve inter-vehicle distance and improved throughput, we consider Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) system. CACC is then implemented in Smart Driving System. For better Performance, wireless communication is used to exchange Information of individual vehicle. By introducing vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication and vehicle to roadside infrastructure (V2R) communications, the vehicle gets information not only from its previous and following vehicle but also from the vehicles in front of the previous Vehicle and following vehicle. This enables a vehicle to follow its predecessor at a closer distance under tighter control.

scholarly journals String Stable Model Predictive Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for Heterogeneous Platoons

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen van Nunen ◽  
Joey Reinders ◽  
Elham Semsar-Kazerooni ◽  
Nathan van de Wouw
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Stable Model ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

Modeling of cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicle and its effect on traffic flow

2021 ◽  
pp. 2250022
Author(s):  
Jianzhong Chen ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Huan Liang ◽  
Zekai Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Flow ◽  
Cooperative Control ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Lane Changing ◽  
Vehicle Communication ◽  
Traffic Efficiency ◽  
Vehicle To Vehicle ◽  
Road Capacity ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

In this paper, an improved multianticipative cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) model is proposed based on fully utilizing multivehicle information obtained by vehicle-to-vehicle communication. More flexible, effective and practical spacing strategy is embedded into the model. We design a new lane-changing rule for CACC vehicles on the freeway. The rule considers that CACC vehicles are more inclined to form a platoon for coordinated control. Furthermore, we investigate the effect of CACC vehicles on two-lane traffic flow. The results demonstrate that introducing CACC vehicles into mixed traffic and forming CACC platoon to cooperative control can improve traffic efficiency and enhance road capacity to a certain extent.

Evaluation of Driver Car-Following Behavior Models for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 2622 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mizanur Rahman ◽  
Mashrur Chowdhury ◽  
Kakan Dey ◽  
M. Rafiul Islam ◽  
Taufiquar Khan
Keyword(s):  
Vehicle Dynamics ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
User Acceptance ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
String Stability ◽  
Maximum Acceleration ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Behavior Models

A cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) system targeted to obtain a high level of user acceptance must replicate the driving experience in each CACC vehicle without compromising the occupant’s comfort. “User acceptance” can be defined as the safety and comfort of the occupant in the CACC vehicle in terms of acceptable vehicle dynamics (i.e., the maximum acceleration or deceleration) and string stability (i.e., the fluctuations in the vehicle’s position, speed, and acceleration). The primary objective of this study was to develop an evaluation framework for the application of a driver car-following behavior model in CACC system design to ensure user acceptance in terms of vehicle dynamics and string stability. The authors adopted two widely used driver car-following behavior models, ( a) the optimum velocity model (OVM) and ( b) the intelligent driver model (IDM), to prove the efficacy of the evaluation framework developed in this research for CACC system design. A platoon of six vehicles was simulated for three traffic flow states (uniform speed, speed with constant acceleration, and speed with constant deceleration) with different acceleration and deceleration rates. The maximum acceleration or deceleration and the sum of the squares of the errors of the follower vehicle speed were measured to evaluate user acceptance in terms of vehicle dynamics and string stability. Analysis of the simulation results revealed that the OVM performed better at modeling a CACC system than did the IDM in terms of acceptable vehicle dynamics and string stability.

Driver Performance in a Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control String

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 1184-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaughan W. Inman ◽  
Steven Jackson ◽  
Brian H. Philips
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Time To Collision ◽  
Driver Performance ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Safety Benefit ◽  
Crash Reduction ◽  
Mean Time

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) has been proposed as a method to increase highway capacity and possibly enhance safety. Two experiments were conducted in a driving simulator to verify that drivers with CACC would effectively monitor the system’s longitudinal control and override the system in the event that greater braking authority was needed than the system was designed to provide. In the first experiment, the emergency response of drivers with the CACC was compared with that of drivers who manually controlled following distance within a string of vehicles. The CACC group experienced markedly fewer crashes and had longer mean time-to-collision. The second experiment examined whether the CACC safety benefit was the result of the CACC system’s limited automatic braking authority, an auditory alarm, or both. The results suggest that both auto-braking and an auditory alarm are necessary to achieve a crash reduction benefit, although the alarm alone may promote less severe collisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document