scholarly journals Validity Evidence and Measurement Equivalence for the Dutch Translation of the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. LeBreton ◽  
Sydney L. Reichin ◽  
Jan te Nijenhuis ◽  
Myckel Cremers ◽  
Kitty Heijden‐Lek
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Equivalence ◽  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Dutch Translation ◽  
Reasoning Test

Not Aggressive or Just Faking It? Examining Faking and Faking Detection on the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan E. Wiita ◽  
Rustin D. Meyer ◽  
Elnora D. Kelly ◽  
Brian J. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Promising Method ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Inside Information ◽  
Personality Assessments ◽  
Reasoning Test

Substantial research has been dedicated to examining and combating respondent misrepresentation (i.e., “faking”) on personality assessments. Two approaches to combat faking that have garnered particular attention include: (a) designing systems to identify likely fakers and (b) developing difficult-to-fake measures. Consistent with suggestions to combine these strategies, the present article examines a new faking detection system specifically designed for a difficult-to-fake measure (i.e., the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression; CRT-A). Four studies (a) help elucidate the conditions under which the CRT-A is fakeable, (b) provide initial construct validity evidence for the faking detection system developed here, (c) examine the effects of faking and faking detection on the CRT-A’s criterion-oriented validity, and (d) show that participants identify CRT-based faking detection items at worse-than-chance levels even when they are fully informed about how these items work. Taken together, these studies reinforce the importance of maintaining the indirect nature of CRTs but also show that the faking detection system developed here represents a promising method of identifying those who may have used inside information to manipulate their scores.

Validity Evidence for a Croatian Version of the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvonimir Galić ◽  
Kelly T. Scherer ◽  
James M. LeBreton
Keyword(s):  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Reasoning Test

Conditional Reasoning Test

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Markovits ◽  
Robert Vachon
Keyword(s):  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Test

The Eyes Chico, They Never Lie – Using Eye-Tracking to Examine Faking on the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-96
Author(s):  
Mitja Ružojčić ◽  
Zvonimir Galić ◽  
Antun Palanović ◽  
Maja Parmač Kovačić ◽  
Andreja Bubić
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Personnel Selection ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Test ◽  
Test Study ◽  
True Purpose ◽  
Response Alternatives

Abstract. To better understand the process of responding to the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression (CRT-A) and its implication for the test's use in personnel selection, we conducted two lab studies in which we compared test scores and eye movements of participants responding honestly and faking the test. Study 1 results showed that, although participants might try to respond differently to the CRT-A while faking, it remains an indirect and unfakeable measure as long as the test's purpose is undisclosed. Study 2 showed that revealing the true purpose of the CRT-A diminishes the test's indirect nature so the test becomes fakeable, solving it requires less attention and participants direct their eyes more to response alternatives congruent with the presentational demands.

'Going implicit': Using implicit measures in organizationsWe thank Catherine Apers for recommending literature on projective tests and for valuable suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper.

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolandi-Eloise Janse van Rensburg ◽  
François S. De Kock ◽  
Eva Derous
Keyword(s):  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Implicit Measures ◽  
Projective Tests ◽  
Reasoning Test ◽  
Verschillende Soorten ◽  
Picture Story Exercise ◽  
Zijn Voor ◽  
Picture Story ◽  
Mate Waarin

Impliciete tests winnen aan populariteit binnen de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie. Ondanks deze groeiende populariteit is nog relatief weinig bekend over de verschillende soorten impliciete tests, de constructen die ermee gemeten worden en de mate waarin ze relevant gedrag in organisaties voorspellen. In dit artikel bespreken we eerst wat impliciete processen zijn op basis van de duale procestheorie. Vervolgens bespreken we de drie meest populaire impliciete tests, namelijk de Implicit Association Test (impliciete associatietest), Picture Story Exercise (plaatjes-verhaaltest) en Conditional Reasoning Test (conditionele redeneertest). Voor elke test beschrijven we de opzet, psychometrische eigenschappen (de betrouwbaarheid, construct- en criteriumgerelateerde validiteit), waargenomen (procedurele) rechtvaardigheid, praktische bruikbaarheid en de mate waarin deze impliciete tests gevoelig zijn voor 'test faking'. Op basis van de best beschikbare empirische evidentie stellen we voor hoe impliciete tests ingezet kunnen worden in organisaties. We bespreken ook welk toekomstig onderzoek hiervoor nodig is. Op deze manier hopen we een waardevolle bijdrage te bieden aan dit groeiende onderzoeksdomein binnen de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie.

Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression--Croatian Version

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvonimir Galić ◽  
Kelly T. Scherer ◽  
James M. LeBreton
Keyword(s):  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Test

Conditional Reasoning: An Integrated Approach to Item Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Smith ◽  
Michael E. Hoffman ◽  
James M. LeBreton
Keyword(s):  
Item Analysis ◽  
Classical Test Theory ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Conditional Reasoning ◽  
Test Theory ◽  
Analytic Framework ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Classical Test ◽  
Reasoning Test ◽  
Unique Nature

This article provides a review of the approach that James used when conducting item analyses on his conditional reasoning test items. That approach was anchored in classical test theory. Our article extends this work in two important ways. First, we offer a set of test development protocols that are tailored to the unique nature of conditional reasoning tests. Second, we further extend James’s approach by integrating his early test validation protocols (based on classical test theory) with more recent protocols (based on item response theory). We then apply our integrated item analytic framework to data collected on James’s first test, the conditional reasoning test for relative motive strength. We illustrate how this integrated approach furnishes additional diagnostic information that may allow researchers to make more informed and targeted revisions to an initial set of items.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document