A Comparison of Three Low Pressure Turbine Designs

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian T. Wakelam ◽  
Martin Hoeger ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

As part of the current research, three low pressure turbine (LPT) geometries—which were designed with a common pitch, axial chord, inlet angle, and exit Mach number and to create the same nominal level of turning—are compared. Each of the LPT cascades was investigated under a range of Reynolds numbers, exit Mach numbers, and under the influence of a moving bar wake generator. Profile static pressure distributions, wake traverses at 5% and 40% axial chord downstream of the trailing edge, and suction side boundary layer traverses were used to compare the performance of the three designs. The total pressure losses are strongly dependent on both the maximum velocity location as well as the diffusion on the suction surface. The importance of the behavior of the pressure surface boundary layer turned out to be negligible in comparison. Cases with equivalent operating Reynolds number and suction side diffusion level are compared in terms of the total pressure losses that are generated. It is shown that a relationship between loss and suction side maximum velocity location exists. An optimum suction side maximum velocity location depends on the Reynolds number, diffusion factor, and wake passing frequency.

A Comparison of Three Low Pressure Turbine Designs

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian T. Wakelam ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis ◽  
Martin Hoeger
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Surface Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Pressure Surface

As part of the current research, three LPT geometries — which were designed with a common pitch, axial chord, inlet angle, and exit Mach number and to create the same nominal level of turning — are compared. Each of the LPT cascades was investigated under a range of Reynolds numbers, exit Mach numbers, and under the influence of a moving bar wake generator. Profile static pressure distributions, wake traverses at 5% and 40% axial chord downstream of the trailing edge and suction side boundary layer traverses were used to compare the performance of the three designs. The total pressure losses are strongly dependant on both the maximum velocity location as well as the diffusion on the suction surface. The importance of the behavior of the pressure surface boundary layer turned out to be negligible in comparison. Cases with equivalent operating Reynolds number and suction side diffusion level are compared in terms of the total pressure losses that are generated. It is shown that a relationship between loss and suction side maximum velocity location exists. An optimum suction side maximum velocity location depends on the Reynolds number, diffusion factor, and wake passing frequency.

Low Pressure Turbine Relaminarization Bubble Characterization using Massively-Parallel Large Eddy Simulations

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shriram Jagannathan ◽  
Markus Schwänen ◽  
Andrew Duggleby
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reverse Flow ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Hairpin Vortices ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Large Eddy

The separation and reattachment of suction surface boundary layer in a low pressure turbine is characterized using large-eddy simulation at Ress = 69000 based on inlet velocity and suction surface length. Favorable comparisons are drawn with experiments using a high pass filtered Smagorinsky model for sub-grid scales. The onset of time mean separation is at s/so = 0.61 and reattachment at s/so = 0.81, extending over 20% of the suction surface. The boundary layer is convectively unstable with a maximum reverse flow velocity of about 13% of freestream. The breakdown to turbulence occurs over a very short distance of suction surface and is followed by reattachment. Turbulence near the bubble is further characterized using anisotropy invariant mapping and time orthogonal decomposition diagnostics. Particularly the vortex shedding and shear layer flapping phenomena are addressed. On the suction side, dominant hairpin structures near the transitional and turbulent flow regime are observed. The hairpin vortices are carried by the freestream even downstream of the trailing edge of the blade with a possibility of reaching the next stage. Longitudinal streaks that evolve from the breakdown of hairpin vortices formed near the leading edge are observed on the pressure surface.

Unsteady flow mechanism of the integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct in low Reynolds number condition

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (9) ◽  
pp. 1507-1517
Author(s):  
Hongrui Liu ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Qiang Du ◽  
Guang Liu ◽  
Pei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Unsteady Flow ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Low Reynolds

Aggressive inter-turbine duct, which has ultra-high bypass ratio and ultra-short axial length, is widely applied in the modern turbofan engine because it can reduce engine weight and improve low-pressure rotor dynamic characteristics. However, the aggressive inter-turbine duct that has swirling flow, wake, shock, and tip clearance leakage flow of upstream high-pressure turbine, and even has structs in its flow channel, is liable to separate, especially in high-altitude low Reynolds number (Re) condition. In addition, its downstream low-pressure turbine is on the edge of separation too. In this paper, an integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct embedded with wide-chord low-pressure turbine nozzle is adopted to eliminate the aggressive inter-turbine duct's end-wall separation. Since there are many studies on suppressing the blade suction surface's separation by upstream wake, in this study inherent wake is utilized to suppress the boundary layer separation on low-pressure turbine nozzle's suction surface in the integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct. The paper studies the unsteady flow mechanisms of the integrated aggressive inter-turbine duct (especially the separation and transition mechanisms of low-pressure turbine nozzle's suction surface boundary layer) by the computatioinal simulation method.

Mach Number Distribution and Profile Losses for Low-Pressure Turbine Profiles With High Diffusion Factors

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Brachmanski ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Flow Separation ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
High Diffusion ◽  
Mach Numbers

The results of this investigation come from two linear cascades at high diffusion factors (DFs). The measurements presented for each low-pressure turbine (LPT) profile were conducted at midspan under a range of Reynolds- and exit Mach numbers. The exit Mach number was varied in a range covering low subsonic up to values where a transonic flow regime on the suction side of the blade could be expected. This work focuses on two profiles with a diffusion factor in a range of 0.18≤DF≤0.22, where values in this range are considered as a comparable for the two cascades. Profile A is a front-loaded design and has shown no obvious flow separation on the suction side of the blade. Compared to the design A, design B is a more aft-loaded profile which exhibits flow separation on the suction side for all Reynolds numbers investigated. The integral total pressure losses were evaluated by wake traverses downstream of the airfoil. To determine the isentropic Mach numbers and the character of the boundary layer along the suction side of the profile, the static pressure measurements and traverses with a flattened Pitot probe were carried out. A correlation between the position of maximum Mach number on the suction side and the integral total pressure losses has been successfully established. The results show that the optimum location of peak Mach number to minimize integral total pressure losses is significantly dependent on the Reynolds number. However, the correlation presented in this paper, which is based on the data of the integral total pressure losses of an attached boundary layer, is not able to predict the integral total pressure loss or the location of the maximum Mach number on the suction side of the blade when an open separation bubble occurs.

The Effect of Pulsed Blowing on the Boundary Layer of a Highly Loaded Low Pressure Turbine Blade

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Mack ◽  
Roland Brachmanski ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Highly Loaded

The performance of the low pressure turbine (LPT) can vary appreciably, because this component operates under a wide range of Reynolds numbers. At higher Reynolds numbers, mid and aft loaded profiles have the advantage that transition of suction side boundary layer happens further downstream than at front loaded profiles, resulting in lower profile loss. At lower Reynolds numbers, aft loading of the blade can mean that if a suction side separation exists, it may remain open up to the trailing edge. This is especially the case when blade lift is increased via increased pitch to chord ratio. There is a trend in research towards exploring the effect of coupling boundary layer control with highly loaded turbine blades, in order to maximize performance over the full relevant Reynolds number range. In an earlier work, pulsed blowing with fluidic oscillators was shown to be effective in reducing the extent of the separated flow region and to significantly decrease the profile losses caused by separation over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. These experiments were carried out in the High-Speed Cascade Wind Tunnel of the German Federal Armed Forces University Munich, Germany, which allows to capture the effects of pulsed blowing at engine relevant conditions. The assumed control mechanism was the triggering of boundary layer transition by excitation of the Tollmien-Schlichting waves. The current work aims to gain further insight into the effects of pulsed blowing. It investigates the effect of a highly efficient configuration of pulsed blowing at a frequency of 9.5 kHz on the boundary layer at a Reynolds number of 70000 and exit Mach number of 0.6. The boundary layer profiles were measured at five positions between peak Mach number and the trailing edge with hot wire anemometry and pneumatic probes. Experiments were conducted with and without actuation under steady as well as periodically unsteady inflow conditions. The results show the development of the boundary layer and its interaction with incoming wakes. It is shown that pulsed blowing accelerates transition over the separation bubble and drastically reduces the boundary layer thickness.

Separated Flow Measurements on a Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph J. Volino
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Transition To Turbulence ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Airfoil Surface ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

Boundary layer separation, transition and reattachment have been studied on a new, very high lift, low-pressure turbine airfoil. Experiments were done under low freestream turbulence conditions on a linear cascade in a low speed wind tunnel. Pressure surveys on the airfoil surface and downstream total pressure loss surveys were documented. Velocity profiles were acquired in the suction side boundary layer at several streamwise locations using hot-wire anemometry. Cases were considered at Reynolds numbers (based on the suction surface length and the nominal exit velocity from the cascade) ranging from 25,000 to 330,000. In all cases the boundary layer separated, but at high Reynolds number the separation bubble remained very thin and quickly reattached after transition to turbulence. In the low Reynolds number cases, the boundary layer separated and did not reattach, even when transition occurred. This behavior contrasts with previous research on other airfoils, in which transition, if it occurred, always induced reattachment, regardless of Reynolds number.

scholarly journals Intermittent Behavior of the Separated Boundary Layer Along the Suction Surface of a Low Pressure Turbine Blade Under Periodic Unsteady Flow Conditions

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. O¨ztu¨rk ◽  
M. T. Schobeiri ◽  
David E. Ashpis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbine Blade ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Boundary Layer Transition ◽  
Wake Flow ◽  
Unsteady Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

The paper experimentally and theoretically studies the effects of periodic unsteady wake flow and aerodynamic characteristics on boundary layer development, separation and re-attachment along the suction surface of a low pressure turbine blade. The experiments were carried out at Reynolds number of 110,000 (based on suction surface length and exit velocity). For one steady and two different unsteady inlet flow conditions with the corresponding passing frequencies, intermittency behavior were experimentally and theoretically investigated. The current investigation attempts to extend the intermittency unsteady boundary layer transition model developed in previously to the LPT cases, where separation occurs on the suction surface at a low Reynolds number. The results of the unsteady boundary layer measurements and the intermittency analysis were presented in the ensemble-averaged, and contour plot forms. The analysis of the boundary layer experimental data with the flow separation, confirms the universal character of the relative intermittency function which is described by a Gausssian function.

Unsteady Loss Production Mechanisms in Low Reynolds Number, High Lift, Low Pressure Turbine Profiles

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benigno J. Lazaro ◽  
Ezequiel Gonzalez ◽  
Raul Vazquez
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Momentum Thickness ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Recirculation Bubble ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
Production Mechanisms

The loss production mechanisms that occur in modern high lift, low pressure turbine profiles operating at low Reynolds numbers and subjected to periodic incoming wakes generated by an upstream located, moving bars mechanism, have been experimentally investigated. In particular, laser-Doppler and hot-wire anemometry have been used to obtain spatially and temporally resolved characterizations of the suction side boundary layer structure at the profile trailing edge. Phase measurements locked to the motion of the upstream moving bars have been used to analyze the effect of the incoming wakes on the suction side boundary layer response, which accounts for most of the profile loss generation. It is observed that the incoming wakes produce a temporal modulation of the boundary layer momentum thickness. This modulation appears to be connected to shedding of rotational flow from the recirculation bubble that develops in the suction side of high lift, low pressure turbine profiles. Furthermore, the momentum thickness reduction and subsequent increase that occurs after the wake passage appears to be related to the unsteady process leading to the recovery of the suction side recirculation bubble. The effect of the wake passage frequency and back surface adverse pressure gradient on the above described mechanisms is also investigated. Conclusions obtained can help understanding the unsteady response of modern low pressure turbine profiles operating in the low Reynolds number regime.

About the Distribution of the Mach Number and Losses Under Consideration of the Diffusion Factor: Profile Distribution and Losses for Low Pressure Turbine Profiles With High Diffusion Factors Under Steady Flow Conditions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Brachmanski ◽  
Reinhard Niehuis
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Flow Separation ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Diffusion Factor ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Exit Mach Number

The results of this investigation consist of two linear cascades at high diffusion factors. The present measurements for each low pressure turbine profile were conducted at midspan under a range of Reynolds- and exit Mach numbers. The exit Mach number was varied in a range covering low subsonic up to values where a transonic flow regime on the suction side of the blade could be expected. The variation of the exit Mach number was also used to create different locations of the maximum Mach number and to evaluate the resulting total pressure losses. This work focuses on two profiles with a diffusion factor in a range of 0.18 ≤ DF ≤ 0.22, which is considered as a comparable level for the two cascades. The profile A is a front-loaded design and has shown no obvious flow separation on the suction side of the blade. Compared to the profile A the design B is a more aft-loaded profile which indicates flow separation on the suction side for all investigated Reynolds numbers. The integral total pressure losses were evaluated by wake traverses downstream of the profile. To determine the isentropic Mach numbers and the character of the boundary layer along the suction side of the profile, static pressure tappings and measurements with a flattened Pitot probe were carried out. Numerical studies were also conducted to investigate further the influence of a reduced turbulence intensity on the boundary layer of the suction side of design B. The results show that the optimum of the integral total pressure losses are significantly dependent on the Reynolds number. Therefore a correlation between the maximum Mach number on the suction side and the integral total pressure losses has been successfully established. A significant change of the turbulence intensity at the inlet of the cascade leads to shift of the location of the maximum Mach number. It also results in an equivalent change of the total pressure losses, which has been predicted by the trend line. However, the trend lines, which are based on the data of the integral total pressure losses of an attached boundary layer, are not able to predict the integral total pressure loss or the location of the maximum Mach number on the suction side of the blade since an open separation bubble occurs.

Separation Control on a Very High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph J. Volino ◽  
Olga Kartuzova ◽  
Mounir B. Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Vortex Generator ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Separation Control ◽  
Suction Surface ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Very High

Boundary layer separation control has been studied using vortex generator jets (VGJs) on a very high lift, low-pressure turbine airfoil. Experiments were done under high (4%) freestream turbulence conditions on a linear cascade in a low speed wind tunnel. Pressure surveys on the airfoil surface and downstream total pressure loss surveys were documented. Instantaneous velocity profile measurements were acquired in the suction surface boundary layer. Cases were considered at Reynolds numbers (based on the suction surface length and the nominal exit velocity from the cascade) of 25,000 and 50,000. Jet pulsing frequency, duty cycle, and blowing ratio were all varied. Computational results from a large eddy simulation of one case showed reattachment in agreement with the experiment. In cases without flow control, the boundary layer separated and did not reattach. With the VGJs, separation control was possible even at the lowest Reynolds number. Pulsed VGJs were more effective than steady jets. At sufficiently high pulsing frequencies, separation control was possible even with low jet velocities and low duty cycles. At lower frequencies, higher jet velocity was required, particularly at low Reynolds numbers. Effective separation control resulted in an increase in lift and a reduction in total pressure losses. Phase averaged velocity profiles and wavelet spectra of the velocity show the VGJ disturbance causes the boundary layer to reattach, but that it can reseparate between disturbances. When the disturbances occur at high enough frequency, the time available for separation is reduced, and the separation bubble remains closed at all times.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document