Analysis of Integrated Coal Gasification System/Compressed-Air Energy Storage Power Plant Concepts

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nakhamkin ◽  
M. Patel ◽  
L. Andersson ◽  
P. Abitante ◽  
A. Cohn
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Compressed Air ◽  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Compressed Air Energy Storage ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Integrated Gasification

This paper presents the results of a project targeted at developing cost effective power plant concept with integrated Coal Gasification System (CGS) and with Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) plant. The developed concepts, denoted as CGS/CAES, provide for continuous operation of CGS and the reheat turboexpander train which are high temperature components, thus improving their operation and extending life resource. A parametric thermodynamic analysis is performed for several CGS/CAES concepts differentiated by their turbomachinery parameters, CGS arrangements, operating cycles, and hours of daily generation. A qualitative cost estimate is made using a variety of sources including published EPRI reports and extensive in-house cost data. A technical and cost comparison is made to the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant.

scholarly journals Turbomachinery Engineering and Optimization for 25 MW and 50 MW Compressed Air Energy Storage Systems

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Schainker ◽  
Michael Nakhamkin ◽  
John R. Stange ◽  
Louis F. Giannuzzi
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Storage Systems ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Performance Data ◽  
Compressed Air ◽  
Load Management ◽  
Compressed Air Energy Storage ◽  
Energy Storage Systems ◽  
Equipment Performance

Results of engineering and optimization of 25 MW and 50 MW turbomachinery trains for compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plant application are presented. Submitted by equipment suppliers, proposals are based on the commercially available equipment. Performance data and budget prices indicate that the CAES power plant is one of the most cost effective sources of providing peaking power and load management.

Compressed Air Energy Storage: Plant Integration, Turbomachinery Development

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nakhamkin ◽  
F. D. Hutchinson ◽  
J. R. Stange ◽  
R. B. Schainker ◽  
F. Canova
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Performance Data ◽  
Compressed Air ◽  
Load Management ◽  
Compressed Air Energy Storage ◽  
Integration Procedure ◽  
Turbomachinery Design ◽  
Equipment Performance

Results of engineering and optimization of 25 MW and 50 MW turbomachinery trains for compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plant application are presented. Proposals submitted by equipment suppliers are based on commercially available equipment. Performance data and budget prices indicate that the CAES power plant is one of the most cost effective sources of providing peaking/intermediate power and load management. The paper addresses CAES power plant integration procedure and the specifics of turbomachinery design.

Survey of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant Performance Estimates

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Pollutant Emissions ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Technical Literature ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Integrated Gasification

The idea of a combined cycle power plant integrated with a coal gasification process has attracted broad interest in recent years. This interest is based on unique attributes of this concept which include potentially low pollutant emissions, low heat rate and competitive economics as compared to conventional steam plants with stack gas scrubbing. Results from a survey of technical literature containing performance and economic predictions have been compiled for comparison and evaluation of this new technique. These performance and economic results indicate good promise for near-term commercialization of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant using current gas turbine firing temperatures. Also, these data show that advancements in turbine firing temperature are expected to provide sufficiently favorable economics for the concept to penetrate the market now held by conventional steam power plants.

Effect of supplementary firing on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant

2000 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
S De ◽  
P K Nag
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Heat Recovery ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Exergy Loss ◽  
Temperature Ratio ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Specific Heats ◽  
Second Law Analysis ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Igcc Power Plant

The effect of supplementary firing on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant is studied. The results are presented with respect to a simple ‘unfired’ IGCC power plant with single pressure power generation for both the gas and the steam cycles as reference. The gases are assumed as real with variable specific heats. It is found that the most favourable benefit of supplementary firing can be obtained for a low temperature ratio R T only. For higher R T, only a gain in work output is possible with a reverse effect on the overall efficiency of the plant. The second law analysis reveals that the exergy loss in the heat-recovery steam generator is most significant as the amount of supplementary firing increases. It is also noteworthy that, although the total exergy loss of the plant decreases with higher supplementary firing for a low R T (= 3.0), the reverse is the case for a higher R T (= 6.0).

Comparison of Preanode and Postanode Carbon Dioxide Separation for IGFC Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Liese
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cell ◽  
Power Density ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Energy Technology ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Lower Efficiency ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Cold Gas

This paper examines the arrangement of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) within a coal gasification cycle, this combination generally being called an integrated gasification fuel cell cycle. This work relies on a previous study performed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) that details thermodynamic simulations of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems and considers various gasifier types and includes cases for 90% CO2 capture (2007, “Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Vol. 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity,” National Energy Technology Laboratory Report No. DOE/NETL-2007/1281). All systems in this study assume a Conoco Philips gasifier and cold-gas clean up conditions for the coal gasification system (Cases 3 and 4 in the NETL IGCC report). Four system arrangements, cases, are examined. Cases 1 and 2 remove the CO2 after the SOFC anode. Case 3 assumes steam addition, a water-gas-shift (WGS) catalyst, and a Selexol process to remove the CO2 in the gas cleanup section, sending a hydrogen-rich gas to the fuel cell anode. Case 4 assumes Selexol in the cold-gas cleanup section as in Case 3; however, there is no steam addition, and the WGS takes places in the SOFC and after the anode. Results demonstrate significant efficiency advantages compared with IGCC with CO2 capture. The hydrogen-rich case (Case 3) has better net electric efficiency compared with typical postanode CO2 capture cases (Cases 1 and 2), with a simpler arrangement but at a lower SOFC power density, or a lower efficiency at the same power density. Case 4 gives an efficiency similar to Case 3 but also at a lower SOFC power density. Carbon deposition concerns are also discussed.

Part-Load Operation of Gas Turbines Induced by Co-Gasification of Coal and Biomass in an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Ravelli
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Inlet Guide Vane ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Fuel Quality ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Part Load ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Integrated Gasification

Abstract This study takes inspiration from a previous work focused on the simulations of the Willem-Alexander Centrale (WAC) power plant located in Buggenum (the Netherlands), based on integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology, under both design and off-design conditions. These latter included co-gasification of coal and biomass, in proportions of 30:70, in three different fuel mixtures. Any drop in the energy content of the coal/biomass blend, with respect to 100% coal, translated into a reduction in gas turbine (GT) firing temperature and load, according to the guidelines of WAC testing. Since the model was found to be accurate in comparison with operational data, here attention is drawn to the GT behavior. Hence part load strategies, such as fuel-only turbine inlet temperature (TIT) control and inlet guide vane (IGV) control, were investigated with the aim of maximizing the net electric efficiency (ηel) of the whole plant. This was done for different GT models from leading manufactures on a comparable size, in the range between 190–200 MW. The influence of fuel quality on overall ηel was discussed for three binary blends, over a wide range of lower heating value (LHV), while ensuring a concentration of H2 in the syngas below the limit of 30 vol%. IGV control was found to deliver the highest IGCC ηel combined with the lowest CO2 emission intensity, when compared not only to TIT control but also to turbine exhaust temperature control, which matches the spec for the selected GT engine. Thermoflex® was used to compute mass and energy balances in a steady environment thus neglecting dynamic aspects.

scholarly journals Simulation and optimization integrated gasification combined cycle by used aspen hysys and aspen plus

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Mohsen Darabi ◽  
Mohammad Mohammadiun ◽  
Hamid Mohammadiun ◽  
Saeed Mortazavi ◽  
Mostafa Montazeri
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Aspen Plus ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Parameters Estimation ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Simulation And Optimization ◽  
Aspen Hysys ◽  
Integrated Gasification

<p>Electricity is an indispensable amenity in present society. Among all those energy resources, coal is readily available all over the world and has risen only moderately in price compared with other fuel sources. As a result, coal-fired power plant remains to be a fundamental element of the world's energy supply. IGCC, abbreviation of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, is one of the primary designs for the power-generation market from coal-gasification. This work presents a in the proposed process, diluted hydrogen is combusted in a gas turbine. Heat integration is central to the design. Thus far, the SGR process and the HGD unit are not commercially available. To establish a benchmark. Some thermodynamic inefficiencies were found to shift from the gas turbine to the steam cycle and redox system, while the net efficiency remained almost the same. A process simulation was undertaken, using Aspen Plus and the engineering equation solver (EES).The The model has been developed using Aspen Hysys® and Aspen Plus®. Parts of it have been developed in Matlab, which is mainly used for artificial neural network (ANN) training and parameters estimation. Predicted results of clean gas composition and generated power present a good agreement with industrial data. This study is aimed at obtaining a support tool for optimal solutions assessment of different gasification plant configurations, under different input data sets.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document