scholarly journals The DRIP Complex and SRC-1/p160 Coactivators Share Similar Nuclear Receptor Binding Determinants but Constitute Functionally Distinct Complexes

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2718-2726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Rachez ◽  
Matthew Gamble ◽  
Chao-Pei Betty Chang ◽  
G. Brandon Atkins ◽  
Mitchell A. Lazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Receptor ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Coactivators ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Sequence Requirements

ABSTRACT Transcriptional activation requires both access to DNA assembled as chromatin and functional contact with components of the basal transcription machinery. Using the hormone-bound vitamin D3receptor (VDR) ligand binding domain (LBD) as an affinity matrix, we previously identified a novel multisubunit coactivator complex, DRIP (VDR-interacting proteins), required for transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors and several other transcription factors. In this report, we characterize the nuclear receptor binding features of DRIP205, a key subunit of the DRIP complex, that interacts directly with VDR and thyroid hormone receptor in response to ligand and anchors the other DRIP subunits to the nuclear receptor LBD. In common with other nuclear receptor coactivators, DRIP205 interaction occurs through one of two LXXLL motifs and requires the receptor's AF-2 subdomain. Although the second motif of DRIP205 is required only for VDR binding in vitro, both motifs are used in the context of an retinoid X receptor-VDR heterodimer on DNA and in transactivation in vivo. We demonstrate that both endogenous p160 coactivators and DRIP complexes bind to the VDR LBD from nuclear extracts through similar sequence requirements, but they do so as distinct complexes. Moreover, in contrast to the p160 family of coactivators, the DRIP complex is devoid of any histone acetyltransferase activity. The results demonstrate that different coactivator complexes with distinct functions bind to the same transactivation region of nuclear receptors, suggesting that they are both required for transcription activation by nuclear receptors.

scholarly journals Modulation of Transcriptional Activation and Coactivator Interaction by a Splicing Variation in the F Domain of Nuclear Receptor Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4α1

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 6509-6522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Sladek ◽  
Michael D. Ruse ◽  
Luviminda Nepomuceno ◽  
Shih-Ming Huang ◽  
Michael R. Stallcup
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Physical Contact ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor ◽  
Splicing Variants

ABSTRACT Transcription factors, such as nuclear receptors, often exist in various forms that are generated by highly conserved splicing events. Whereas the functional significance of these splicing variants is often not known, it is known that nuclear receptors activate transcription through interaction with coactivators. The parameters, other than ligands, that might modulate those interactions, however, are not well characterized, nor is the role of splicing variants. In this study, transient transfection, yeast two-hybrid, and GST pulldown assays are used to show not only that nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 α1 (HNF4α1, NR2A1) interacts with GRIP1, and other coactivators, in the absence of ligand but also that the uncommonly large F domain in the C terminus of the receptor inhibits that interaction. In vitro, the F domain was found to obscure an AF-2-independent binding site for GRIP1 that did not map to nuclear receptor boxes II or III. The results also show that a natural splicing variant containing a 10-amino-acid insert in the middle of the F domain (HNF4α2) abrogates that inhibition in vivo and in vitro. A series of protease digestion assays indicates that there may be structural differences between HNF4α1 and HNF4α2 in the F domain as well as in the ligand binding domain (LBD). The data also suggest that there is a direct physical contact between the F domain and the LBD of HNF4α1 and -α2 and that that contact is different in the HNF4α1 and HNF4α2 isoforms. Finally, we propose a model in which the F domain of HNF4α1 acts as a negative regulatory region for transactivation and in which the α2 insert ameliorates the negative effect of the F domain. A conserved repressor sequence in the F domains of HNF4α1 and -α2 suggests that this model may be relevant to other nuclear receptors as well.

scholarly journals Activating Signal Cointegrator 2 Belongs to a Novel Steady-State Complex That Contains a Subset of Trithorax Group Proteins

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Hwa Goo ◽  
Young Chang Sohn ◽  
Dae-Hwan Kim ◽  
Seung-Whan Kim ◽  
Min-Jung Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Trithorax Group ◽  
Trithorax Group Proteins

ABSTRACT Many transcription coactivators interact with nuclear receptors in a ligand- and C-terminal transactivation function (AF2)-dependent manner. These include activating signal cointegrator 2 (ASC-2), a recently isolated transcriptional coactivator molecule, which is amplified in human cancers and stimulates transactivation by nuclear receptors and numerous other transcription factors. In this report, we show that ASC-2 belongs to a steady-state complex of approximately 2 MDa (ASC-2 complex [ASCOM]) in HeLa nuclei. ASCOM contains retinoblastoma-binding protein RBQ-3, α/β-tubulins, and trithorax group proteins ALR-1, ALR-2, HALR, and ASH2. In particular, ALR-1/2 and HALR contain a highly conserved 130- to 140-amino-acid motif termed the SET domain, which was recently implicated in histone H3 lysine-specific methylation activities. Indeed, recombinant ALR-1, HALR, and immunopurified ASCOM exhibit very weak but specific H3-lysine 4 methylation activities in vitro, and transactivation by retinoic acid receptor appears to involve ligand-dependent recruitment of ASCOM and subsequent transient H3-lysine 4 methylation of the promoter region in vivo. Thus, ASCOM may represent a distinct coactivator complex of nuclear receptors. Further characterization of ASCOM will lead to a better understanding of how nuclear receptors and other transcription factors mediate transcriptional activation.

Sequence requirements for premature transcription arrest within the first intron of the mouse c-fos gene

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2832-2841
Author(s):  
N Mechti ◽  
M Piechaczyk ◽  
J M Blanchard ◽  
P Jeanteur ◽  
B Lebleu
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
First Intron ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Intron 1 ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Sequence Requirements

A strong block to the elongation of nascent RNA transcripts by RNA polymerase II occurs in the 5' part of the mammalian c-fos proto-oncogene. In addition to the control of initiation, this mechanism contributes to transcriptional regulation of the gene. In vitro transcription experiments using nuclear extracts and purified transcription templates allowed us to map a unique arrest site within the mouse first intron 385 nucleotides downstream from the promoter. This position is in keeping with that estimated from nuclear run-on assays performed with short DNA probes and thus suggests that it corresponds to the actual block in vivo. Moreover, we have shown that neither the c-fos promoter nor upstream sequences are absolute requirements for an efficient transcription arrest both in vivo and in vitro. Finally, we have characterized a 103-nucleotide-long intron 1 motif comprising the arrest site and sufficient for obtaining the block in a cell-free transcription assay.

Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2832-2839
Author(s):  
A S Ponticelli ◽  
K Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

The promoter region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 gene contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that direct transcription initiation to two sites designated +1 and +13. On the basis of differences between their nucleotide sequences and their responsiveness to upstream promoter elements, it has previously been proposed that TC and TR promote transcription by different molecular mechanisms. To begin a study of his3 transcription in vitro, we used S. cerevisiae nuclear extracts together with various DNA templates and transcriptional activator proteins that have been characterized in vivo. We demonstrated accurate transcription initiation in vitro at the sites used in vivo, transcriptional activation by GCN4, and activation by a GAL4 derivative on various gal-his3 hybrid promoters. In all cases, transcription stimulation was dependent on the presence of an acidic activation region in the activator protein. In addition, analysis of promoters containing a variety of TR derivatives indicated that the level of transcription in vitro was directly related to the level achieved in vivo. The results demonstrated that the in vitro system accurately reproduced all known aspects of in vivo his3 transcription that depend on the TR element. However, in striking contrast to his3 transcription in vivo, transcription in vitro yielded approximately 20 times more of the +13 transcript than the +1 transcript. This result was not due to inability of the +1 initiation site to be efficiently utilized in vitro, but rather it reflects the lack of TC function in vitro. The results support the idea that TC and TR mediate transcription from the wild-type promoter by distinct mechanisms.

Nuclear receptor-binding protein 1: a novel tumour suppressor and pseudokinase

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1055-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason S. Kerr ◽  
Catherine H. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Present Review ◽  
Critical Components ◽  
Receptor Binding Protein

Pseudokinases are a class of kinases which are structurally designated as lacking kinase activity. Despite the lack of kinase domain sequence conservation, there is increasing evidence that a number of pseudokinases retain kinase activity and/or have critical cellular functions, casting aside previous notions that pseudokinases simply exist as redundant kinases. Moreover, a number of recent studies have implicated pseudokinases as critical components in cancer formation and progression. The present review discusses the interactions and potential functions that nuclear receptor-binding protein 1, a pseudokinase recently described to have a tumour-suppressive role in cancer, may play in cellular homoeostasis and protein regulation. The recent findings highlighted in the present review emphasize the requirement to fully determine the function of pseudokinases in vitro and in vivo, the understanding of which may ultimately uncover new directions for drug discovery.

Nuclear receptor coactivators: the key to unlock chromatin

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xu
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Nuclear Hormone Receptor ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Coactivators ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complex

The biological effects of hormones, ranging from organogenesis, metabolism, and proliferation, are transduced through nuclear receptors (NRs). Over the last decade, NRs have been used as a model to study transcriptional control. The conformation of activated NRs is favorable for the recruitment of coactivators, which promote transcriptional activation by directly communicating with chromatin. This review will focus on the function of different classes of coactivators and associated complexes, and on progress in our understanding of gene activation by NRs through chromatin remodeling.Key words: nuclear hormone receptor, p160 family of coactivators, histone modification, chromatin remodeling complex.

scholarly journals Yeast Coactivator MBF1 Mediates GCN4-Dependent Transcriptional Activation

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4971-4976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Takemaru ◽  
Satoshi Harashima ◽  
Hitoshi Ueda ◽  
Susumu Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Binding Region

ABSTRACT Transcriptional coactivators play a crucial role in gene expression by communicating between regulatory factors and the basal transcription machinery. The coactivator multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) was originally identified as a bridging molecule that connects theDrosophila nuclear receptor FTZ-F1 and TATA-binding protein (TBP). The MBF1 sequence is highly conserved across species fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae to human. Here we provide evidence acquired in vitro and in vivo that yeast MBF1 mediates GCN4-dependent transcriptional activation by bridging the DNA-binding region of GCN4 and TBP. These findings indicate that the coactivator MBF1 functions by recruiting TBP to promoters where DNA-binding regulators are bound.

scholarly journals BAF60a Mediates Critical Interactions between Nuclear Receptors and the BRG1 Chromatin-Remodeling Complex for Transactivation

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 6210-6220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Wen Hsiao ◽  
Christy J. Fryer ◽  
Kevin W. Trotter ◽  
Weidong Wang ◽  
Trevor K. Archer
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Coactivators ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complex ◽  
Truncation Mutant ◽  
Promoter Recruitment

ABSTRACT Nuclear hormone receptors are ligand-dependent transcriptional regulators that modulate chromatin structure. However, the precise molecular mechanisms by which receptors recruit chromatin-remodeling activity are not fully elucidated. We show that in the absence of its ligand-binding domain, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is able to interact with both nuclear receptor coactivators and the BRG1 chromatin-remodeling complex in vivo. Individually, the GR makes direct interactions with BRG1-associated factor 60a (BAF60a) and BAF57, but not with BRG1, BAF155, or BAF170. Further, BAF60a possesses at least two interaction surfaces, one for GR and BRG1 and a second for BAF155 and BAF170. A GR mutant, GR(R488Q), that fails to interact with BAF60a in vitro has reduced chromatin-remodeling activity and reduced transcriptional activity from the promoter assembled as chromatin in vivo. Stable expression of a BAF60a truncation mutant, BAF60a4-140, caused chromatin-specific loss of GR functions in vivo. In the presence of the BAF60a mutant, the GR fails to interact with the BRG1 complex and consequently is also deficient in its ability to activate transcription from chromatin. Thus, in addition to previously identified BAF250, BAF60a may provide another critical and direct link between nuclear receptors and the BRG1 complex that is required for promoter recruitment and subsequent chromatin remodeling.

scholarly journals Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2832-2839 ◽  
Author(s):  
A S Ponticelli ◽  
K Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

The promoter region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 gene contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that direct transcription initiation to two sites designated +1 and +13. On the basis of differences between their nucleotide sequences and their responsiveness to upstream promoter elements, it has previously been proposed that TC and TR promote transcription by different molecular mechanisms. To begin a study of his3 transcription in vitro, we used S. cerevisiae nuclear extracts together with various DNA templates and transcriptional activator proteins that have been characterized in vivo. We demonstrated accurate transcription initiation in vitro at the sites used in vivo, transcriptional activation by GCN4, and activation by a GAL4 derivative on various gal-his3 hybrid promoters. In all cases, transcription stimulation was dependent on the presence of an acidic activation region in the activator protein. In addition, analysis of promoters containing a variety of TR derivatives indicated that the level of transcription in vitro was directly related to the level achieved in vivo. The results demonstrated that the in vitro system accurately reproduced all known aspects of in vivo his3 transcription that depend on the TR element. However, in striking contrast to his3 transcription in vivo, transcription in vitro yielded approximately 20 times more of the +13 transcript than the +1 transcript. This result was not due to inability of the +1 initiation site to be efficiently utilized in vitro, but rather it reflects the lack of TC function in vitro. The results support the idea that TC and TR mediate transcription from the wild-type promoter by distinct mechanisms.

scholarly journals Fra-1 Induces Morphological Transformation and Increases In Vitro Invasiveness and Motility of Epithelioid Adenocarcinoma Cells

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 7095-7105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Kustikova ◽  
Dmitrii Kramerov ◽  
Mariam Grigorian ◽  
Vladimir Berezin ◽  
Elisabeth Bock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Morphological Transformation ◽  
Morphological Alterations ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

ABSTRACT Two cell lines originating from a common ancestral tumor, CSML0 and CSML100, were used as a model to study AP-1 transcription factors at different steps of tumor progression. CSML0 cells have an epithelial morphology; they express epithelial but not mesenchymal markers and are invasive neither in vitro nor in vivo. CSML100 possesses all characteristics of a highly progressive carcinoma. These cells do not form tight contacts, are highly invasive in vitro, and are metastatic in vivo. AP-1 activity was considerably higher in CSML100 cells than in CSML0 cells. There was a common predominant Jun component, namely, JunD, detected in both cell lines. We found that the enhanced level of AP-1 in CSML100 cells was due to high expression of Fra-1 and Fra-2 proteins, which were undetectable in CSML0 nuclear extracts. Analysis of the transcription of different AP-1 members in various cell lines derived from tumors of epithelial origin revealed a correlation of fra-1 expression with mesenchymal characteristics of carcinoma cells. Moreover, we show here for the first time that the expression of exogenous Fra-1 in epithelioid cells results in morphological changes that resemble fibroblastoid conversion. Cells acquire an elongated shape and become more motile and invasive in vitro. Morphological alterations were accompanied by transcriptional activation of certain genes whose expression is often induced at late stages of tumor progression. These data suggest a critical role of the Fra-1 protein in the development of epithelial tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document