Longitudinal study of medical downgrades in the Royal Air Force

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2021-001839
Author(s):  
Stefano Capella ◽  
E Demoulin ◽  
C Wilkinson ◽  
P Hindle

IntroductionAs the focus of the Royal Air Force (RAF) shifts from sustained to contingency operations and the number of personnel is reduced, the burden of retained, medically downgraded personnel may affect operational readiness. The main aims were: to define the prevalence of morbidity leading to permanent medical downgrading; to determine at risk populations and identify areas for improvement.MethodDatabase of personnel referred to the RAF Medical Board was analysed from January 2012 to October 2013 and January 2017 to December 2019. Patients were excluded if they did not require a formal medical board; incomplete and duplicate entries were also excluded. The primary reason for medical downgrade was categorised with an ICD-10 code. Further subanalysis compared musculoskeletal disease with age, individual trade groups and anatomic region.Results2% of RAF service personnel were permanently downgraded annually. Musculoskeletal disease was the leading cause for permanent downgrade across both periods: 58% and 49%. Female personnel were at a greater risk of musculoskeletal downgrade compared with males. Spinal and knee pathology were the leading cause for downgrading among ‘high risk’ personnel. Personnel downgraded due to musculoskeletal pathology were often retained in a limited role with 10% and 5% retained as medically fully deployable. 14% and 12% of personnel downgraded due to musculoskeletal pathology were medically discharged.ConclusionMusculoskeletal disease was the leading cause for permanent medical downgrades in the RAF. A greater proportion of downgraded personnel with musculoskeletal conditions were retained in service with medical limitations rather than medically discharged.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syeda Noor-ul-Huda Shahid ◽  
Usman W. Chohan
Keyword(s):  

1935 ◽  
Vol 80 (517) ◽  
pp. 50-68
Author(s):  
L. L. Maclean
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel OM Manda ◽  
Mark S Gilthorpe ◽  
Yu-Kang Tu ◽  
Andrew Blance ◽  
Martin T Mayhew

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1870.1-1870
Author(s):  
I. García Hernández ◽  
L. Fernández de la Fuente Bursón ◽  
P. Muñoz Reinoso ◽  
D. V. Mendoza Mendoza ◽  
B. Hernández-Cruz ◽  
...  

Background:Musculoskeletal Diseases (MSKD) represent one of the main health problems burdens worldwide. They cause a significant functional, quality of life and socioeconomic impact. Knee and lumbar osteoarthritis are the most prevalent1. MSKD can be assessed by different kind of specialists: Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery (OTS), Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, each of them focused at one of the distinct aspects of the same disease. It is the General Practitioner (GP) consultations that usually act as a gateway to specialized care. However, this derivation is carried out in non-standardized manners that leads to an evaluation from a sometimes wrong selected specialist or sometimes overlap management between several of them2. The result is an endless waiting list in an overburden health system that cannot solve people’s health issues. In 2018, only in our area, 32.894 patients with MSKD were referred from GP to the different medical consultations: OTS (65%), Rehabilitation (25%) and Rheumatology (10%). Furthermore, there are specialized consultations called“Primary Trauma”to which GP can refer which are managed indistinctly by any of the 3 specialists mentioned before.Objectives:The following study aims to assess by collecting data in one of these consultations, how these pathologies are referred to the different specialist and the role that the rheumatologist plays in its management.Methods:From January to March 2019, 300 consecutive patients´ medical records from the HUVM area that were sent to “Primary Trauma” consultations and attended by a rheumatologist have been reviewed. The reason for consultation, tests and referrals requested, diagnoses reached and procedures and other therapeutic actions performed were collected. Descriptive statistics with percentages and mean are showed.Results:The average age of the patients was 51 years [7-88], 57% (170) women and 43% (130) men. The most frequent reasons for referral were knee pain (26), foot pathology (23%), low back pain (12%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6%). 68% (204 patients) attended the consultation with some test already performed request in primary care, mostly radiographs (61%) and MRI scan (34%). After the first assessment during consultation, only 31% required new studies. The diagnoses that were most frequently established are showed in table 1: degenerative knee pathology (29%) was the most prevalent. 60% of the patients assessed were given exercise tables and/or postural recommendations. 14% received an infiltration on the same day of the visit. Only 78 patients (26%) needed to be reviewed later in those consultations. Of the remaining 222 (74%), 81 (27%) were referred to other specialists. 56 of them (19%) went to OTS to a surgical evaluation, most frequently of the knee (32%), hand (27%) and foot (23%). 141 (47%) were discharged and referred to GP´s for follow ups.Table 1.Diagnoses.N%Degenerative knee pathology6729Plantar support alterations3415Lumbar osteoarthritis198Deformities of the feet177Mechanical metatarsalgia125Plantar fasciitis94Carpal tunnel syndrome94Conclusion:The prevalence of MSKD found in medical consultation coincides with the national registers. Most patients did not need to be referred to surgical units. The role of the Rheumatologist is to take a comprehensive care for the patient, focusing on giving an effective evaluation and quick solution to his MSKD. In short, if the most prevalent MSKD are not subsidiary of surgical treatment (at least initially), the specialist whom patients with MSKD should be referred would be the rheumatologist.References:[1]EPISER2016: Estudio de la prevalencia de las enfermedades reumáticas en población adulta en España. Sociedad Española de Reumatología. Madrid, 2018.[2]Conill EM et al. Waiting lists in public systems: from expanding supply to timely access? Reflections on Spain’s National Health System. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16:2783–94.Disclosure of Interests:Isabel García Hernández: None declared, Lola Fernández de la Fuente Bursón: None declared, Paloma Muñoz Reinoso: None declared, Dolores V. Mendoza Mendoza: None declared, Blanca Hernández-Cruz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Sanofi, BMS, STADA, Paz González Moreno: None declared, José Javier Pérez Venegas: None declared


The Lancet ◽  
1934 ◽  
Vol 224 (5809) ◽  
pp. 1458
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-187
Author(s):  
A Wrigley

AbstractHypoxia training at the Royal Air Force Centre of Aviation Medicine (RAF CAM) has traditionally involved the use of a hypobaric chamber to induce hypoxia. While giving the student experience of both hypoxia and decompression, hypobaric chamber training is not without risks such as decompression sickness and barotrauma. This article describes the new system for hypoxia training known as Scenario-Based Hypoxia Training (SBHT), which involves the subject sitting in an aircraft simulator and wearing a mask linked by hose to a Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device (ROBD). The occupational requirements to be declared fit for this new training method are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document