scholarly journals In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 541-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Duque ◽  
Kelly Limi Aida ◽  
Jesse Augusto Pereira ◽  
Gláucia Schuindt Teixeira ◽  
Angela Scarparo Caldo-Teixeira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Microscopic evaluation of rotatory and handle caries removal on glass ionomer cement/dentin interface

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Silvio José Mauro ◽  
Adriana Beatriz Silveira Pinto Fernandes ◽  
Fernando Yamamoto Chiba ◽  
Renato Herman Sundfeld ◽  
Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Group I ◽  
Microscopic Evaluation ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Aim: This study evaluated the interface between glass ionomer cement (GIC) and dentin using the conventional and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) techniques for removal of decayed tissue. Materials and Methods: After preparation of the cavities by the conventional (Group I – GI) and ART (Group II – GII) techniques, the specimens were divided into 3 subgroups according to the GIC used (n=10). The conventional GIC KETAC FILL (3M/ESPE) was used in the groups GI-1 and GII-1, the conventional GIC VIDRION R (SS WHITE) in the groups GI-2 and GII-2, and the modified GIC FUJI II LC (GC Corporation) in the groups GI-3 and GII-3. For the microscopic analysis, the teeth were decalcified in a solution containing equal portions of 50% formic acid and 20% sodium citrate, dehydrated and submitted to paraffin baths. The samples were sectioned (6mm in thickness), stained by the Brown and Brenn method, and evaluated in a light microscope. Results: The microscopic analysis revealed interaction between the material and dentin structure only with the FUJI II LC. In addition, the behavior was superior for the conventional technique in comparison to the ART technique. Conclusion: It was concluded that the technique used for carious dentin removal does not seem to be determinant for the bonding of ionomeric materials to the dental structure, except for the resin-modified GIC in which the formed hybrid layer was higher using the conventional technique.

scholarly journals Reduction of dental fear and anxiety: the outlook of atraumatic restorative treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 730
Author(s):  
Patricia Aleixo dos Santos Domingos ◽  
Livia Maria Prado Fonseca ◽  
Ana Luisa Botta Martins de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Patient Cooperation ◽  
Carious Process ◽  
Fear And Anxiety ◽  
Ionomer Cement

AIM: This study aimed to report a case in which the technique used was the atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in patients with fear of conventional treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This procedure consisted in the treatment of carious lesions in the patient associated with the program of educational and preventive measures which the patient has undergone. The technique described here was performed on tooth 85, which presented atypical carious lesion cavity, through the removal of softened carious tissue with the use of hand instruments, without anesthesia and use of direct restorative material with fluoride release (glass ionomer cement). RESULTS: As a result of this technique, there was greater patient cooperation and decrease of anxiety initially revealed. CONCLUSION: Thus, it might be concluded that the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment is a technique already established that showed clinical effectiveness in controlling the evolution of the carious process and that being well indicated, was able to induce more cooperation from the patient, leading to the success of therapy restorer. The conventional glass ionomer cement showed excessive surface wear and therefore should not be used to restore atypical cavities.

Are S-PRG Based Composites Able to Resist and Protect the Adjacent Enamel Against Erosive Wear?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Tozi Portaluppe Bergantin ◽  
Camilla Cristina Di Leone ◽  
Thiago Cruvinel da Silva ◽  
Linda Wang ◽  
Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Erosive Wear ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Tooth Wear ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Final Profile ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract This in-vitro study evaluated the resistance of S-PRG-based-composites against erosive wear and their protective effect on enamel adjacent to restoration. Bovine-enamel-blocks were randomized into 12 groups (n=10/group), according to the factors material and type of wear (erosion-e or erosion+abrasion-a): S-PRG-based-composite-Beautifil II®(SPRGe/SPRGa); S-PRG-based bulk-fill-Beautifil Bulk Restorative®(SPRGBFe/SPRGBFa); composite-Filtek Z350 XT®(RCe/RCa); bulk-fill-composite-Filtek Bulk Fill®(BFe and BFa); glass-ionomer cement-EQUIA Forte®(GICe/GICa); resin-modified glass-ionomer cement-Riva®(RMGICe/RMGICa). Standardized cavities were prepared in specimens and restored. Initial profile was performed on the material and on the adjacent enamel at distances of 100/200/300/600 and 700μm. Specimens were immersed in 0.5%citric-acid (2min-6x/day-during 5days), and abrasive challenge was performed using a toothbrushing-machine (1min-after erosive challenge). Final profile was obtained following initial. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey-test (α<0.05). On erosion, the GICe and RMGICe groups presented greater loss of material compared to other groups; up to 300μm away from the restoration, GICe and SPRGBFe were able to promote less enamel loss than composite groups. For erosion+abrasion S-PRG-based groups showed intermediate material wear compared to GICs (higher wear) and composites (less wear); there was no difference of enamel wear adjacent to restorations among groups. It is concluded that S-PRG-based-composites are a good alternative for restorative treatment of erosive tooth wear.Clinical Significance: S-PRG-based composite restorations are able to diminish surrounding enamel erosive wear, similarly to glass ionomer cement, with the advantage of being more resistant to erosive challenge. Therefore, this material is a potential option to restore advanced erosion lesions in patients with etiological factors still present.

scholarly journals Modifications of Glass Ionomer Cement Powder by Addition of Recently Fabricated Nano-Fillers and Their Effect on the Properties: A Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 470-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imran Alam Moheet ◽  
Norhayati Luddin ◽  
Ismail Ab Rahman ◽  
Thirumulu Ponnuraj Kannan ◽  
Nik Rozainah Nik Abd Ghani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Nano Particles ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Nano Particle ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Ionomer Cement

AbstractThe aim of this article is to provide a brief insight regarding the recent studies and their recommendations related to the modifications to glass ionomer cement (GIC) powder in order to improve their properties. An electronic search of publications was made from the year 2000 to 2018. The databases included in the current study were EBSCOhost, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. The inclusion criteria for the current study include publication with abstract or full-text articles, original research, reviews or systematic reviews, in vitro, and in vivo studies that were written in English language. Among these only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Articles published in other languages, with no available abstract and related to other nondentistry fields, were excluded. A detailed review of the recent materials used as a filler phase in GIC powder has revealed that not all modifications produce beneficial results. Recent work has demonstrated that modification of GIC powder with nano-particles has many beneficial effects on the properties of the material. This is due to the increase in surface area and surface energy, along with better particle distribution of the nano-particle. Therefore, more focus should be given on nano-particle having greater chemical affinity for GIC matrix as well as the tooth structure that will enhance the physicochemical properties of GIC.

scholarly journals In vitro and in vivo investigation of the biological and mechanical behaviour of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Rogéria Freire de Castilho ◽  
Cristiane Duque ◽  
Thaís de Cássia Negrini ◽  
Nancy Tomoko Sacono ◽  
Andréia Bolzan de Paula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Behaviour ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document