Curiosity or underdiagnosed? Thoracolumbar spinal column injuries with concomitant trauma of the pancreas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Hax ◽  
Sascha Halvachizadeh ◽  
Kai Oliver Jensen ◽  
Till Berk ◽  
Henrik Teuber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Pancreatic Injury ◽  
Spinal Injuries ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The pancreas is an organ which is at risk of damage as a consequence of thoracolumbar spine injury. However, to our knowledge, no studies have provided any prevalence data to support this assumption. Therefore, the coincidence of pancreatic trauma in patients with spine injury is still unknown. Data from the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) was analysed to estimate the prevalence of this correlation and to determine its influence on clinical outcome.Methods: A retrospective investigation of cases documented in the TR-DGU between 2008 and 2017 was performed. We included data of patients admitted to participating European trauma centres who had thoracic or lumbar spine injuries and met the following criteria: i) Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 9, ii) blunt trauma, and iii) no early transfer out of hospital. We investigated the coincidence of pancreas injury in patients with at least an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 2 of the thoracic or lumbar spine. Therefore, we included all kind of relevant injuries of the thoracolumbar spine.Results: In the group with thoracolumbar injury with concomitant pancreatic injury, the mean age was 43.1 ± 18.6 years, and 68% of these patients were male. The most frequent mechanisms of trauma were car (38%) and motorbike (17%) accidents, as well as high falls (23.8%). The mean Injury Severity Score was 35.7 ± 16.0 points and the in-hospital mortality rate was 17.5%. The overall prevalence of pancreatic injury was 60.7 (0.61%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58–0.65) per 10,000 patients. Patients with severe spinal injuries (AIS ≥ 2) were more likely to present with a concomitant pancreatic injury compared to patients with no or only minor spinal injury (AIS 0–1) (Odds ratio (OR) 1.78; 95%CI, 1.57–2.01).Conclusions: Concomitant pancreatic injury in patients with spinal injuries of the thoracolumbar spine is rare. However, patients with more severe spinal injuries were overall more likely (OR 1.78) to present with an accompanying pancreatic injury than those with minor thoracolumbar injuries. Therefore, trauma surgeons treating severely injured patients must be alert not to overlook this rare concomitant injury, because it does not clearly correlate with the severity of spinal injury.

scholarly journals Epidemiology and predictors of traumatic spine injury in severely injured patients: implications for emergency procedures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Häske ◽  
◽  
Rolf Lefering ◽  
Jan-Philipp Stock ◽  
Michael Kreinest
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Spinal Injuries ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Emergency Procedures ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Injured Patients

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of spinal injuries that are suitable for immobilization. Methods Retrospective cohort study drawing from the multi-center database of the TraumaRegister DGU®, spinal injury patients ≥ 16 years of age who scored ≥ 3 on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) between 2009 and 2016 were enrolled. Results The mean age of the 145,833 patients enrolled was 52.7 ± 21.1 years. The hospital mortality rate was 13.9%, and the mean injury severity score (ISS) was 21.8 ± 11.8. Seventy percent of patients had no spine injury, 25.9% scored 2–3 on the AIS, and 4.1% scored 4–6 on the AIS. Among patients with isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI), 26.8% had spinal injuries with an AIS score of 4–6. Among patients with multi-system trauma and TBI, 44.7% had spinal injuries that scored 4–6 on the AIS. Regression analysis predicted a serious spine injury (SI; AIS 3–6) with a prevalence of 10.6% and cervical spine injury (CSI; AIS 3–6) with a prevalence of 5.1%. Blunt trauma was a predictor for SI and CSI (OR 4.066 and OR 3.640, respectively; both p < 0.001) and fall > 3 m for SI (OR 2.243; p < 0.001) but not CSI (OR 0.636; p < 0.001). Pre-hospital shock was predictive for SI and CSI (OR 1.87 and OR 2.342, respectively; both p < 0.001), and diminished or absent motor response was also predictive for SI (OR 3.171) and CSI (OR 7.462; both p < 0.001). Patients over 65 years of age were more frequently affected by CSI. Conclusions In addition to the clinical symptoms of pain, we identify ‘4S’ [spill (fall) > 3 m, seniority (age > 65 years), seriously injured, skull/traumatic brain injury] as an indication for increased attention for CSIs or indication for spinal motion restriction.

scholarly journals Skor prediksi sindrom disfungsi multi-organ pada pasien multitrauma

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Rendy ◽  
Heber B. Sapan ◽  
Laurens T. B. Kalesaran ◽  
Julius H. Lolombulan
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
The Mean

Abstract: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in patients with major trauma remains to be frequent and devastating complication during clinical course in emergency department and intensive care unit (ICU). The ability to easily and accurately identify patients at risk for MODS postinjury especially in multitrauma cases would be very valuable. This study aimed to construct an instrument for prediction of the development of MODS in adult multitrauma patients using clinical and laboratory data available in the first day at prahospital and emergency department (hospital) setting. This was a prospective study. Samples were adult multitrauma patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16, aged 16-65 years old, admitted to 4 academic Level-I trauma center from September 2014 to September 2015. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was used to determine MODS during hospitalization. A risk score created from the final regression model consisted of significant variables as MODS predictor. The results showed that there were 98 multitrauma patients as samples. The mean age was 35.2 years old; mostly male (85.71%); the mean of ISS was 23.6; mostly (76.53%) were caused by blunt injury mechanism. MODS was encountered in 43 patients (43.87%). The prediction risk score consists of Revised Trauma Score (RTS) (<7.25) and serum lactate level ≥2 mmol/L. This study also verified several independent risk factors for post multitrauma MODS, such as ISS >25, presence of SIRS, shock grade 2 or more, and white blood cell count >12,000/mm3. Conclusion: We derived a novel, simple, and applicable instrument to predict MODS in adult following multitrauma. The use of this scoring system may allow early identification of multitrauma patients who are at risk for MODS and result in more aggressive targeted resuscitation and better referral allocation based on regional trauma system.Keywords: MODS, multitrauma, emergency department, MODS prediction scoreAbstrak: Sindrom disfungsi multi-organ (MODS) merupakan komplikasi buruk yang sering terjadi sepanjang perjalanan klinis pasien trauma mayor di Unit Gawat Darurat (UGD) maupun di ruang perawatan intensif. Suatu nilai patokan yang dapat memprediksi MODS pascatrauma secara akurat sejak dini tentunya sangat berharga bagi tatalaksana pasien terutama pada kasus multitrauma. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuat suatu instrumen yang dapat memrediksi perkembangan MODS pada pasien dewasa multitrauma dengan menggunakan data klinis dan laboratorium yang tersedia pada 24 jam pertama pasca trauma pada seting fase prahospital maupun di fase hospital sejak di UGD. Jenis penelitian ini prospektif, mengumpulkan pasien multitrauma dengan Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16, rentang usia 16-65 tahun, di 4 pusat trauma level-1 rumah sakit pendidikan selama 1 tahun (September 2014-2015). Dilakukan pencatatan data klinis dan laboratorium sesuai perkembangan pasien. Skor sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) digunakan untuk menentukan adanya MODS selama perawatan. Skor prediksi dibuat dengan membangun model regresi logistik yang signifikan untuk memrediksi terjadinya MODS pasca multitrauma. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan 98 sampel multitrauma yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dengan rerata usia 35,2 tahun, sebagian besar laki-laki (85,71%) dengan rerata ISS 23,6, dan disebabkan oleh trauma tumpul (76,53%). MODS terjadi pada 43 pasien (43,87%). Skor prediksi terdiri dari RTS dengan (cut off point 7,25) dan kadar laktat serum (cut off point 3,44 mmol/mL). Penelitian ini juga memverifikasi beberapa faktor risiko individual terjadinya MODS pasca multitrauma yaitu ISS>25, adanya SIRS, syok derajat 2 atau lebih, dan leukositosis >12.000. Simpulan: Kami melaporkan instrumen baru yang praktis untuk memrediksi MODS pada pasien multitrauma dewasa. Skor ini memungkinkan identifikasi dini pasien trauma yang berisiko akan mengalami MODS sehingga dapat menjadi tanda alarm dilakukannya resusitasi yang lebih agresif dan tepat serta alokasi rujukan pasien yang lebih efisien berdasarkan sistem trauma regional.Kata kunci: MODS, multitrauma, UGD, skor prediksi MODS

Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1057-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Timothy A. Moore ◽  
Kirkland W. Davis ◽  
Robert W. Molinari ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spine Injury

Assessing Incidence and Risk Factors of Cervical Spine Injury in Blunt Trauma Patients Using the National Trauma Data Bank

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 879-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Young ◽  
Luke Wolfe ◽  
Glenn Tinkoff ◽  
Therese M. Duane
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Alcohol Intoxication ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Ligamentous Injury ◽  
National Trauma

Despite the potentially devastating impact of missed cervical spine injuries (CI), there continues to be a large disparity in how institutions attempt to make the diagnosis. To better streamline the approach among institutions, understanding incidence and risk factors across the country is paramount. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors of CI using the National Trauma Databank for 2008 and 2009. We performed a retrospective review of the National Trauma Databank for 2008 and 2009 comparing patients with and without CI. We then performed subset analysis separating injury by patients with and without fracture and ligamentous injury. There were a total of 591,138 patients included with a 6.2 per cent incidence of CI. Regression found that age, Injury Severity Score, alcohol intoxication, and specific mechanisms of motor vehicle crash (MVC), motorcycle crash (MCC), fall, pedestrian stuck, and bicycle were independent risk factors for overall injury ( P < 0.0001). Patients with CI had longer intensive care unit (8.5 12.5 vs 5.1 7.7) and hospital lengths of stay (days) (9.6 14.2 vs 5.3 8.1) and higher mortality (1.2 per cent vs 0.3%), compared with those without injury ( P < 0.0001). There were 33,276 patient with only fractures for an incidence of 5.6 per cent and 1875 patients with ligamentous injury. Just over 6 per cent of patients suffer some form of CI after blunt trauma with the majority being fractures. Higher Injury Severity Score and MVC were consistent risk factors in both groups. This information will assist in devising an algorithm for clearance that can be used nationally allowing for more consistency among trauma providers.

scholarly journals Curiosity or Underdiagnosed? Injuries to Thoracolumbar Spine with Concomitant Trauma to Pancreas

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 700
Author(s):  
Jakob Hax ◽  
Sascha Halvachizadeh ◽  
Kai Oliver Jensen ◽  
Till Berk ◽  
Henrik Teuber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Pancreatic Injury ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Abbreviated Injury Scale ◽  
Prevalence Data ◽  
Pancreatic Injuries ◽  
Serious Injury ◽  
The Impact

The pancreas is at risk of damage as a consequence of thoracolumbar spine injury. However, there are no studies providing prevalence data to support this assumption. Data from European hospitals documented in the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) between 2008–2017 were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of this correlation and to determine the impact on clinical outcome. A total of 44,279 patients with significant thoracolumbar trauma, defined on Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) as ≥2, were included. Patients transferred to another hospital within 48 h were excluded to prevent double counting. A total of 135,567 patients without thoracolumbar injuries (AIS ≤ 1) were used as control group. Four-hundred patients with thoracolumbar trauma had a pancreatic injury. Pancreatic injuries were more common after thoracolumbar trauma (0.90% versus (vs.) 0.51%, odds ratio (OR) 1.78; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.57–2.01). Patients with pancreatic injuries were more likely to be male (68%) and had a higher mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) than those without (35.7 ± 16.0 vs. 23.8 ± 12.4). Mean length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital was longer with pancreatic injury. In-hospital mortality was 17.5% with and 9.7% without pancreatic injury, respectively. Although uncommon, concurrent pancreatic injury in the setting of thoracolumbar trauma can portend a much more serious injury.

scholarly journals Survival and quality of hospital care for victims of car crashes in Western Azerbaijan, Iran

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Car Crashes

Background and aim: Car crashes are among the prevalent incidents seriously threatening public health. This study aimed to assess the survival and quality of hospital care for patients of car accidents in Western Azerbaijan, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,697 trauma victims admitted to Imam Khomeini hospital in Urmia, Iran, during 2016. The data, including systolic pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, respiratory rate prior to admittance, severity of injuries based on surgery description, limbs and brain computed tomography scan, and diagnostic ultrasound by an specialist, were collected from medical records. The survival chance of patients was estimated using Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). To evaluate the quality of hospital service, Z and W statistics were utilized. Results: Out of 1,697 admitted victims, 1,226 (72.3%) and 471 (27.7%) subjects were male and female, respectively. The patients were within the age range of 15-54 years, including 901 (75%) male and 296 (25%) female subjects. The predominant educational levels were under diploma and illiterate in male and female patients, respectively. The mean values of the Revised Trauma Score for the recovered and deceased patients were 7.75±0.38 and 6.19±1.59, respectively; however, the mean values of the Injury Severity Score for the recovered and deceased patients were 14.57±13.72 and 52.03±27.02, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The number of observed mortalities was 69; nevertheless, the expected mortalities were 60 cases. Furthermore, the quantified W and Z statistics were -9 and 0.02, respectively. Conclusions: The results showed that the observed mortality exceeded the expected morality indicating the low quality of hospital care.

Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1057-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Timothy A. Moore ◽  
Kirkland W. Davis ◽  
Robert W. Molinari ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Spine Injury

scholarly journals External Multicenter Study of Reliability and Reproducibility for Lower Cervical Spine Injuries Classification Systems—Part 2: An Analysis of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score Scale

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-107
Author(s):  
Andrey Grin ◽  
Vladimir Krylov ◽  
Ivan Lvov ◽  
Aleksandr Talypov ◽  
Dmitriy Dzukaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Moderate Level ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Subaxial Cervical Spine ◽  
Level Of Agreement ◽  
Injury Classification

Study Design: A multicenter observational survey. Objective: To quantify and compare inter- and intraobserver reliability of the subaxial cervical spine injury classification (SLIC) and the cervical spine injury severity score (CSISS) in a multicentric survey of neurosurgeons with different experience levels. Methods: Data concerning 64 consecutive patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery between 2013 and 2017 was evaluated, and we surveyed 37 neurosurgeons from 7 different clinics. All raters were divided into 3 groups depending on their level of experience. Two assessment procedures were performed. Results: For the SLIC, we observed excellent agreement regarding management among experienced surgeons, whereas agreement among less experienced neurosurgeons was moderate and almost twice as unlikely. The sensitivity of SLIC relating to treatment tactics reached as high as 92.2%. For the CSISS, agreement regarding management ranged from medium to substantial, depending on a neurosurgeon’s experience. For less experienced neurosurgeons, the level of agreement concerning surgical management was the same as for the SLIC in not exceeding a moderate level. However, this scale had insufficient sensitivity (slightly exceeding 50%). The reproducibility of both scales was excellent among all raters regardless of their experience level. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated better management reliability, sensitivity, and reproducibility for the SLIC, which provided moderate interrater agreement with moderate to excellent intraclass correlation coefficient indicators for all raters. The CSISS demonstrated high reproducibility; however, large variability in answers prevented raters from reaching a moderate level of agreement. Magnetic resonance imaging integration may increase sensitivity of CSISS in relation to fracture management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document