Dynamic Balancing Responses in Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Following Transversal Plane Perturbations During Slow Treadmill Walking Differ Considerably for Amputated and Nonamputated Side
Abstract BackgroundDue to disrupted motor and proprioceptive function lower limb amputation imposes considerable challenges associated with balance and greatly increases risk of falling in case of perturbations during walking. The aim of this study was to investigate dynamic balancing responses in unilateral transtibial amputees when they were subjected to perturbing pushes to the pelvis at the time of foot strike on nonamputated and amputated side during slow walking.MethodsFourteen subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation and nine healthy subjects participated in the study. They were subjected to perturbations that were delivered to the pelvis in different directions at the time of foot strike of either left or right leg. Centre of pressure and centre of mass positions, duration of in-stance and stepping periods as well as ground reaction forces were recorded and analysed for significant differences in dynamic balancing responses between healthy subjects and subjects with amputation when subjected to perturbation upon entering stance phases with nonamputated or amputated side.ResultsWhen perturbations were delivered at the time of foot strike of nonamputated leg subjects with amputation were able to modulate centre of pressure and ground reaction force similarly as healthy subjects. There was a complete lack of in-stance response when perturbations were delivered at the time of foot strike of amputated leg. Instead they used stepping strategy and adjusted placement of nonamputated leg in the ensuing stance phase to increase (forward perturbation) or decrease (backward perturbation) step length or making a cross-step (outward perturbation) which resulted in higher displacement of centre of mass. However, when perturbations were directed inward healthy subjects and subjects with amputation reacted primarily with a stepping response regardless whether healthy, nonamputated or amputated leg was in stance phase.ConclusionsResults of this study suggest that due to the absence of COP modulation mechanism that is normally supplied by calf muscles people with unilateral transtibial amputation are compelled to choose stepping strategy over in-stance strategy when they are subjected to perturbation on the amputated side. However the stepping response is less efficient than in-stance response which may potentially be significant contributor to frequent falls.