scholarly journals Kedudukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara Sebagai Upaya Dalam Mendorong Terbentuknya Pemerintahan Yang Baik

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Khalid Dahlan ◽  
Anna Erliyana Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Government Decision ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Good Government ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Efforts to encourage the implementation of proper governments are continually done in each country, including one of them in the Republic of Indonesia. A decent government can be realized if it is followed by government decisions that are responsive to the needs and interests of the community. The decision of the state administration officials in the effort to realize a proper government must be based on the general principles of good governance, especially those that have been mentioned in Act. No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. In term of realizing a proper government, it not only becomes the duty of the state administration officials through the decisions formed, but also the involvement of the community as the plaintiff for any government decision that feels disadvantaged and the state administrative court as an institution that examines and decides disputes between the community and the government by continuing to refer the laws and general principles of a good government is part of realizing a good governance.

scholarly journals New Paradigm Of Abuse Of Power On Discretion After Government Administration Act

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidayat Pratama Putra
Keyword(s):  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
The State ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
Legal Provision ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government

Discretion is one of government actions that are very vulnerable to abuse of power in it. Law Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration as a legal provision in the field of state administration currently regulates in detail related to discretion, abuse of power, and abuse of power in discretion in particular. This paper discusses the regulation related to abuse of power that has a paradigm shift based on Law Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration and benchmark it in discretion. The Government Administration Act builds a new paradigm of abuse of power by interpreting broadly abuse of power comprising beyond authority, misuse of authority and arbitrary. There are several indicators to show that discretion can be considered as abuse of power, namely: • Contrary to the Act and/or the principle of good governance; Notwithstanding the purpose of discretion or the purpose of the state in general; Breaking discretionary procedures; Beyond the Authority (onbevoegdheid); And/or has no basis of authority.

Tinjauan Hukum Putusan Sela dalam Bentuk Schorsing pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

2017 ◽  
pp. 15-45
Author(s):  
Dezonda R Pattipawae ◽  
Heillen M. Y. Tita
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
The State ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Postponement ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The postponement of a State Administrative Decision which becomes the object of the dispute may be granted, since there is still a continuous factual action to be taken, namely the appointment of a definitive Regional Secretary, the inauguration or handover of the position of the dismissed Regional Secretary to the appointed Secretary of the Region whose contents as statements (declarations) of submission of all duties, powers and duties. Decree of the Governor of Maluku Number: 125.a Year 2014 dated May 20, 2014 concerning the Transfer of Civil Servants, on behalf of Kapressy Charles, SH. MSi, NIP: 19560911 198603 1 009 from Southwest Maluku District in Tiakur to the Government of Povinsi Maluku in Ambon, so Kapressy Charles, SH. Msi, felt his interest was damaged by the decision issued by the Governor of Maluku as the State Administration Officer. Therefore the concerned filed a lawsuit to the State Administrative Court of Ambon with Case No. 23/G/2014/PTUN.ABN, concerned requested to carry out the postponement of the transfer from the Government of the Southwest Maluku District to the Government of Maluku Province in due to the contradiction of the principles general good governance or prevailing laws and regulations.

scholarly journals Jurisdiction of state administration in the procedure of issuing travel documents

2011 ◽  
pp. 241-258
Author(s):  
Zoran Loncar
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Foreign Affairs ◽  
Freedom Of Movement ◽  
Exclusive Jurisdiction ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
Internal Affairs ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Under the new law on travel documents, in addition to authority that has the Government of Serbia, in terms of issuing travel documents and a shared competence between the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs depending on the type of travel document in question. Ministry of Foreign Affairs is authorized to issue a diplomatic passport, official passport and travel document, while all other travel documents are issued by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. When it comes to the passport as the most important travel document the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is fully established. Diplomatic and Consular Missions of the Republic of Serbia abroad can now only receive requests for passport, but the issuance of travel documents of this type is exclusive jurisdiction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Such jurisdiction of the state administration in the process of issuing travel documents, along with other novelties which significantly modernize this kind of special administrative procedures should in practice very quickly enable the efficient issuance of travel documents, thus achieving the complete freedom of movement as one of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to the citizens of the Republic of Serbia.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Audit Internal dan Akuntabilitas Suber Daya Manusia terhadap Perwujudan Good Governance pada Lembaga SKK Migas

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Latifah Latifah ◽  
A. Rinto Pudyantoro
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Internal Audit ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
The State ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Special Unit ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

<p>Special Unit for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (SKK Migas) is an institution established by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia through Presidential Regulation (Perpres) No. 9 of 2013 on the Management of Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities. The task of SKK Migas is to manage the upstream oil and gas business activities based on cooperation contracts. The purpose of the establishment of this institution so that retrieval of natural resources of oil and gas owned by the State can provide maximum benefit and acceptance for the state to the greatest prosperity of the people. Based on these tasks and objectives, SKK Migas is responsible to the state and all Indonesian people to work properly, honestly, fairly, cleanly, transparently and competently in order to achieve good governance of state institutions. Therefore, internal monitoring (internal audit) and accountability of its human resources are required. This research has a purpose to test the influence of internal audit and human resource accountability to the achievement of good governance at SKK Migas institution. This research uses survey method with population of all staffs of SKK Migas. Sampling method used is sampling with purposive sampling technique. In this study, 145 samples were taken. Methods of data collection was done by using questionnaires containing several questions with the method of data analysis using multiple regression. The result of this research is to accept both hypothesis which is internal audit have positive effect toward the achievement of good governance in SKK Migas. And the accountability of human resources positively affect the achievement of good governance in SKK Migas.</p>

scholarly journals An Existence of State Administration Court in Establishing Good Governance

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ruslin Ruslin
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Functions ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Good Government ◽  
Executive Agencies

Administration officials have broad authority in carrying out the affair of government. With this broad authority tends to be misused to cause harm and injustice in the society, therefore there must be other institutions that control it. Based on the theory of Trigs Politico executive agencies are politically controlled by the legislative and juridical institutions controlled by the judiciary, because the officials running the state administration executive functions that control the judiciary is legally the state administrative court. Judicial control of administrative functions of the state administrative court in addition aims to provide legal protection for the public and state administration officials themselves, as well as state administrative law enforcement agencies who aspire to realize a good and authoritative government. Keywords: Good government, State administration court

scholarly journals Expansion of the Objects of State Administrative Disputes after the Enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration and Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019 Concerning Guidelines for the Resolution and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by Government Agencies or Officials (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad / OOD)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Sonyendah Retnaningsih ◽  
Disriani Latifah Soroinda Nasution ◽  
Heryna Oktaviani ◽  
Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Government Action ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government

Historically, State Administrative Court (PTUN) has existed since 1986, with the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court which currently has been amended by Law Number 9 of 2004 concerning Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court and amended again by Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. The role of the Administrative Court according to the explanation of the law, the PTUN functions as a control or supervisory agency thus legal actions from government officials do not deviate, in addition to protecting the rights of citizens from the actions of officials who abuse their authority or act arbitrarily. Currently, the object of dispute and can be sued at the State Administrative Court is only a State Administration decision reduced by the exceptions stipulated in Article 2 and Article 49 of the PTUN Law. The provisions of Article 3 of the Administrative Court Law No. 5 of 1986 on negative fictitious could potentially no longer be enforced since the enactment of Article 53 of the AP Law which stipulates positive fictitious. Since the promulgation of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (hereinafter referred to as AP Law) on 17 October 2014, there has been a change in the legal criteria from the government written stipulation (beschikkingen) which was initially restrictive and can be sued to the PTUN, yet it has recently become extensive (which was originally mere beschkking, currently it almost covers all variations of besluiten). With the enactment of the AP Law, there will be an expansion of absolute competence and objects of state administration disputes, as stipulated in Article 87 of the AP Law which includes: first, Government Administration Decrees, as stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of the AP Law; second, Government Administration Actions Based on Article 1 point 8 of the AP Law. Furthermore, with the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Government Action Dispute Resolution and the Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by Government Agencies and/or Officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad / OOD), the judicial power shall transfer from the General Court to the State Administrative Court. This crucial matter continues to be the groundwork and reason for conducting the current research entitled the expansion of the state administration dispute object after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and the supreme court regulation (Perma) Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Government Action Dispute Resolution and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by the Government Agencies and/or Officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad / OOD). Conducted through normative juridical research method, this research-based paper examined the interviews through judges at PTUN Jakarta and Bandung and the main data source within this qualitative analysis serves as the secondary data or literature data.

scholarly journals The Meaning of the Expansion of Administrative Court that Covers Factual Actions

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-192
Author(s):  
Fellista Ersyta Aji
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Research Material ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Justice

The Administrative Court and Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Justice have been provided facilities for the public to sue the government and ask to cancel the decision made by the government. Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has been stipulated that Government Administration Act more or less supersedes the provisions contained in the Law of the State administrative justice. Especially in this Law which attracts attention is the expansion of object disputes state Administration. The object of the state Administration dispute in this Act is different from its elements to the Law of the State administrative justice. One of these is a written stipulation that includes factual action. There is no explanation for the meaning of factual acts in this Administrative Administration Act. Therefore, further research is needed in this regard. This study aims to find out and understand the meaning of factual actions in Article 87 letter (a) of Law Number 30 of 2014. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of research Normative Juridical. Data collection techniques are Library study is to collect data conducted by reading, quoting, recording and understanding various literature that have to do with research material. The object of the state Administration disputed in Law Number 5 of 1986 and its amendment has expanded on Law Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration. When the object of the dispute expands, it will affect the decision taken by the legal practitioner in this case is the state Administration judge.

POLOŽAJ VLADE U USTAVNO-PRAVNOM SISTEMU REPUBLIKE SRBIJE

2021 ◽  
pp. 201-213
Author(s):  
Anika Kovačević ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
The State ◽  
Executive Power ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
And Control ◽  
Relationship Of

The author analyzes the composition, affairs and tasks of the Government, as well as the Government's attitude towards the National Assembly, the President of the Republic and the state administration, in order to more precisely normative position the Government as the bearer of executive power in the constitutional system of Serbia. The Government of the Republic of Serbia, together with the state administration, represents an extremely complex, fundamentally important system for the functioning of the institutional, legal and political order of our country. Building a legitimate and efficient relationship of cooperation with these bodies, while respecting the competencies and control mechanisms of the Government provided by the Constitution and laws, is a necessary factor in further upgrading Serbia as a state governed by the rule of law, achieving the principle of separation of powers in Serbia.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Eksekusi Putusan Sela Dalam Bentuk Schorsing Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

SASI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Dezonda Rosiana Pattipawae
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
The State ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Postponement ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The postponement of a State Administrative Decision which becomes the object of the dispute may be granted, since there is still a continuous factual action to be taken, namely the appointment of a definitive Regional Secretary, the inauguration or handover of the position of the dismissed Regional Secretary to the appointed Secretary of the Region whose contents as statements (declarations) of submission of all duties, powers and duties. Decree of the Governor of Maluku Number: 125.a Year 2014 dated May 20, 2014 concerning the Transfer of Civil Servants, on behalf of Kapressy Charles, SH. MSi, NIP: 19560911 198603 1 009 from Southwest Maluku District in Tiakur to the Government of Povinsi Maluku in Ambon, so Kapressy Charles, SH. Msi, felt his interest was damaged by the decision issued by the Governor of Maluku as the State Administration Officer. Therefore the concerned filed a lawsuit to the State Administrative Court of Ambon with Case No. 23/G/2014/PTUN.ABN, concerned requested to carry out the postponement of the transfer from the Government of the Southwest Maluku District to the Government of Maluku Province in due to the contradiction of the principles general good governance or prevailing laws and regulations.

Organisation of the National Rescue and Firefighting System in Poland

1970 ◽  
Vol 20 (274) ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
Barbara Węglarz
Keyword(s):  
Fire Service ◽  
The State ◽  
Internal Security ◽  
Regional Coordination ◽  
State Administration ◽  
System Functioning ◽  
Rescue System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Executive Level

National Firefighting and Rescue System (NFRS) has been created to protect population, property and environment within the territory of the Republic of Poland by the following activities: extinguishing fires, fighting against the local threats, chemical and ecological rescue operations, technical rescue operations and first medical aid. NFRS, as an integral part of the internal security system of the country, is financed by the Government. The Chief Commandant of the State Fire Service is the central body of the state administration responsible for organization and managing the NFRS. The system operates on three administrative levels corresponding with the administrative structure of the country: district (main executive level, where interventions are carried out by the district’s resources), regional (coordination and assistance to the rescue operations when resources in the district are insufficient) and national (rescue operations assistance and coordination when resources in the region are insufficient). The main purpose of this article is to present : tasks performed by the NFRS (National Firefighting and Rescue System), functioning of the system at three levels (district, regional and national), cooperation of the NFRS with subjects like Police, Border Guard, units of Voluntary Fire Brigade and many others.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document