scholarly journals Numerical Simulation of High-Speed Impact on Regolith Using Compressible and Non-Expanding Fluid Model

Author(s):  
Kojiro SUZUKI
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-736
Author(s):  
Radek Doubrava ◽  
Martin Oberthor ◽  
Petr Bělský ◽  
Jan Raška

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the approach for the design of a jet engine composite air inlet for a new generation of jet trainer aircraft from the perspective of airworthiness requirements regarding high-speed impact resistance. Design/methodology/approach Validated numerical simulation was applied to flat test panels. The final design was optimised and verified by validated numerical simulation and verified by testing on a full-scale demonstrator. High-speed camera measurement and non-destructive testing (NDT) results were used for the verification of the numerical models. Findings The test results of flat test panels confirmed the high durability of the composite structure during inclined high-speed impact with a near-real jet inlet load boundary condition. Research limitations/implications Owing to the sensitivity of the composite material on technology production, the results are limited by the material used and the production technology. Practical implications The application of flat test panels for the verification and tuning of numerical models allows optimised final design of the air inlet and reduces the risk of structural non-compliance during verification tests. Originality/value Numerical models were verified for simulation of the real composite structure based on high-speed camera results and NDT inspection after impact. The proposed numerical model was simplified for application in a real complex design and reduced calculation time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 303 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
E.N. Kramshonkov ◽  
A.V. Krainov ◽  
Evgeny N. Pashkov

The paper discusses the results of the numerical simulation of high-speed impact effect of compact projectiles made of steel and tungsten alloy with steel obstacles of equal mass. The obstacles have different initial porosity of the material. Conducted the final evaluation of the penetration speed of the projectile depending on the porosity of the obstacle and the initial speed of the shock interaction. The initial impact velocity range from 1 to 16 [km/s]. The destruction, melting and evaporation of the interacting bodies are taken into account. The analysis of porosity influence evaluation of obstacles material revealed that the protective advantage of porous obstacles disclose at the higher impact velocities, greater than 1.5 [km/s] for steel strikers and 2 [km/s] for projectiles of tungsten alloy. The more impact velocity the more protective effect of porous obstacles.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-570
Author(s):  
Wei-gui ZHANG ◽  
Liang-ju HE ◽  
Pei-jie LI ◽  
Yi-cong YE ◽  
Xue FENG ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 4629-4636
Author(s):  
Kyungsun Chung ◽  
Hyoungjoon Kwon ◽  
Jung Su Park ◽  
Soonho Song

2018 ◽  
Vol 927 ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.N. Kramshonkov ◽  
A.V. Krainov ◽  
E.N. Pashkov

The paper discusses the results of the numerical simulation of high-speed impact effect of compact projectiles made of steel and tungsten alloy with steel obstacles of equal mass. The obstacles have different initial porosity of the material. Conducted the final evaluation of the penetration speed of the projectile depending on the porosity of the obstacle and the initial speed of the shock interaction. The initial impact velocity range from 1 to 16 [km/s]. The destruction, melting and evaporation of the interacting bodies are taken into account. The analysis of porosity influence evaluation of obstacles material revealed that the protective advantage of porous obstacles disclose at the higher impact velocities, greater than 1.5 [km/s] for steel strikers and 2 [km/s] for projectiles of tungsten alloy. The more impact velocity the more protective effect of porous obstacles.


AIAA Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 1223-1229
Author(s):  
Ge-Cheng Zha ◽  
Doyle Knight ◽  
Donald Smith ◽  
Martin Haas

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 729-739
Author(s):  
GU Xin-bao ◽  
◽  
ZHOU Xiao-ping ◽  
XU Xiao ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document