scholarly journals Pengaturan Mengenai Pendaftaran Pendirian Firma Pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 475
Author(s):  
I Made Hengki Permadi

The process or procedure for establishing a firm is regulated in Article 22 and Article 23 of the Commercial Law Code (hereinafter referred to as KUHD). In this provision, it is stipulated that the firm must be established with an authentic deed and registered with the Registrar of the District Court where the firm was established. The regulations in the KUHD are not in line with the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 17 Year 2018 regarding the Registration of the Military Alliance, the Fima Alliance and the Civil Alliance which indicates that the registration of the firm is carried out in the Legal Entity Administration System (hereinafter referred to as SABU). it appears that there is a norm conflict between the two rules. This study aims to determine the arrangements in registering the Firm and the legal consequences of not registering the Firm in the Business Entity Administration System (SABU). This research is a normative legal research. In research using a statutory and conceptual approach. Using primary and secondary legal materials. The results showed that based on the principle of Lex Superiori derogate Legi Inferiori, based on the hierarchy of statutory regulations, the KUHD which is equivalent to the Law is stronger than the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 17 of 2018 concerning Registration of Komanditer Alliance, Firm Alliance and Civil Alliance whose position is under Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations, because the Acts are higher than Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations. The legal consequence of not registering a firm with SABU is that the name of the firm can be used first by other firms so it must change the name of the firm concerned with another name because in the SABU system there is a registration of the firm's alliance name. If there is a partnership with another firm that registers the name of the firm first, then the name of the same firm cannot be registered again and the firm is deemed invalid. Proses atau tata cara pendirian firma diatur dalam Pasal 22 dan Pasal 23 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (yang selanjutnya disebut KUHD). Dalam ketentuan tersebuti menentukan bahwa firma harus didirikan dengan akta otentik dan didaftarkan pada Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri dimana firma tersebut didirikan. Peraturan dalam KUHD tersebut tidak sejalan dengan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer, Persekutuan Fima dan Persekutuan Perdata yang mengisyaratkan bahwa pendaftaran firma dilakukan pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum (yang selanjutnya disebut SABU). terlihat bahwa adanya konflik norma diantara kedua aturan itu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui   pengaturan dalam pendaftaran Firma  dan akibat hukum apabila tidak mendaftarkan Firma pada Sistem Administrasi Badan Usaha (SABU). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam penelitian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.   Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa  berdasarkan asas Lex Superiori derogate Legi Inferiori maka berdasarkan hirarki peraturan perundang-undangan, KUHD yang setara dengan Undang-Undang lebih kuat dibanding Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Persekutuan Komanditer, Persekutuan Firma dan Persekutuan Perdata yang kedudukannya dibawah Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden, karena Undang-Undang kedudukannya lebih tinggi dari Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Presiden. Akibat hukum dari tidak didaftarkannya firma pada SABU, yaitu nama firma dapat dipakai terlebih dahulu oleh firma lainnya sehingga harus mengganti nama firma yang bersangkutan dengan nama yang lain karena di dalam sistem SABU terdapat pendaftaran nama persekutuan firma. Jika ada persekutuan firma lain yang mendaftarkan nama firmanya terlebih dahulu maka nama firma yang sama tidak akan bisa didaftarkan kembali dan firma tersebut dianggap tidak sah pendiriannya.

Author(s):  
Masykur Masykur ◽  
Azhari Yahya ◽  
Dahlan Dahlan

This study aims to explain the limits and responsibilities of the position carried out by the notary in registration of Commanditaire Vennootschap (CV) online through the business entity administration system. The research method used in this research is normative juridical using a statutory and conceptual approach. The collection of research materials is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the notary was only authorized and responsible for the creation of the deed of CV. Notary cannot receive power of attorney because it contradicts the UUJN which has been stipulated authority and responsibility attached to the position of a Notary. With the enactment of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2018. Registration of CV which was previously in the District Court is delegated to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through the online system. The entire Notary is acting as an Authorized Officer not as an authorized official, there is a prosecution of an error in the registration process, then the Notary can indirectly be presented in the trial at the Court but it must be with the permission of the Notary Honorary Council. Thus the Notary can refuse to accept power over online CV registration via SABU, because in carrying out such registration a Notary must position himself as a person not as a public official. This is because it is not regulated in Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public. 


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 492
Author(s):  
I Gede Agus Yudi Suryawan ◽  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra

In accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number M-05 HT.01.01 of 2002 concerning the Enforcement of the Legal Entity Administration System at the Directorate General of General Legal Administration of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, determines that all legal entity settlements include the ratification of the deed of establishment PT, application for approval and submission of deed reports, amendments to articles of association, fiduciary registration, will registration, are carried out with the online Legal Entity Administration System. So the notary has the authority to register all these legal acts online. The purpose of this research is to find out the role of the Notary in registering deeds and legalization of legal entities through the Directorate General of AHU Online services and to find out the responsibilities of the Notary if there are problems in registering deeds and legal entity approval through the services of the Directorate General of AHU Online. This study uses a normative juridical research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the research, namely, the role of the notary in registering deeds and ratifying legal entities is entering deed data, checking all deed data to avoid data entry errors and the notary has the responsibility if there is an error from the notary's office, the notary will make corrections at a cost of Notary, however in this regard there is still cooperation from the applicant regarding the required data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yani Kosali

Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights of an object based on trust, where ownership right of the object is transferred remains under the control of the owner of the object. The subject of the research was how to bind the object of fiduciary guarantee according to Law Number 42 of 1999 on fiduciary? What are the consequences if the binding of fiduciary guarantee object is unfulfilled? This research was normative legal research which means that the objects are secondary data on library. The type of the research was descriptive. It can be concluded that the binding of fiduciary guarantee object according to Law Number 42 of 1999 on fiduciary guarantee is certificate of fiduciary guarantee as an evidence which is an authentic deed. It can be seen from the characteristics of certificate fiduciary guarantee, issued by an authorized official or public official who has authority for issuing certificate fiduciary guarantee in Fiduciary Registration Office under the supervision of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The consequences (the binding of fiduciary guarantee object is unfulfilled) are the default causes several legal consequences for debtors and creditors, especially for creditors who must loss. While for debtors, the legal consequence is the existence of a new status for which the debtor must responsible of. Fiduciary guarantee, mostly in form of movable objects, allows for a transfer of fiduciary guarantee; one example of the reason for the transfer is the debtor wants to transfer his credit to another creditor to seek for lower interest. Then, if a debtor has paid off the debt, it can cause the fiduciary guarantee to be canceled.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-201
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Purnama Wati ◽  
Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

Credit agreements are usually accompanied by a collateral agreement and an insurance agreement. This insurance agreement is a means of transferring risk for the bank, especially life insurance in the event of a debtor's death, besides credit can also fall to the heirs if the debtor dies before paying off the remaining credit. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of the Bank's Credit Agreement in the event that the Debtor dies and to find out the responsibility of the Insurance Party for the Bank's Credit Agreement in the event the Debtor dies. This study uses a normative research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the legal consequence of the credit agreement in the event that the debtor dies, there are two possibilities, namely that the credit goes to the heirs as regulated in article 833 of the Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek) or the guarantee is executed by the bank, and the second possibility is that the credit is written off due to a life insurance clause or a life insurance agreement with a banker's clause, which means that the insurance company must be responsible for paying off the remaining debts of the debtor who died according to the terms and conditions of the policy, otherwise the interested party can file a summons to sue the insurance company. From this, the conclusion is that the parties must fully understand the contents of the credit agreement made, so that later if this risk occurs, there will be clarity on the payment of the debtor's remaining debt.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-425
Author(s):  
I Made Ari Nurjaya ◽  
I Nyoman Sumardhika ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

One of the legal products made by notary as a part of their authorities is a deed, both authentic deeds and underhand-made deeds. In addition to these deeds, a notary also has the authority to issue a certificate which is commonly referred to as a covernote. A certificate or covernote is a statement or note in the form of information confirming that a land ownership deed is in the process of a certificate making that is due to a process of roya, transfer of name of land ownership and splitting of one certificate into two. This study examines two issues related to notary authority, namely the basis for the notary’s authority in issuing a covernote and the legal consequences of making the covernote. This study uses a normative legal research method and a conceptual approach as well as a statutory approach. The results showed that the covernote issued by a notary was actually an ordinary certificate, not a legal product of a notary. Covernote only contains an explanation of the deed that is in the process of certification which has not been completed and will be completed within a period determined by the notary itself, so the covernote is not legally binding. The notary is authorized to make a covernote, but it is not regulated in the laws and regulations so that, if it is concluded, the covernote is not a legal product of a notary. The legal consequences for the notary if they fail to carry out the covernote, they can be held liable to solve them immediately. The legal consequence of not fulfilling the contents of the covernote is a violation of Article 1366 of the Criminal Code because notaries are considered negligent in carrying out their duties and authorities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riska Amalia Indahsari ◽  
Khansa Muafa ◽  
Ita Fattumah

AbstractNotaries are public officials appointed by the State to carry out the duties of the State in legal services such as making authentic deeds. In carrying out its duties and responsibilities making authentic notarial deeds sometimes make mistakes that affect civil, administrative and criminal sanctions. If seen in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b of the UUJN that minuta deed must be made and kept as part of the Notary protocol. The purpose of this research is to analyze the importance of a notary to make a certificate of minutes in making a copy of the deed. What is the juridical effect on the deed of minutes not owned by a Notary in making a copy of the deed, then what is the legal consequence for the Notary who did not make the deed of minutes in making a copy of the deed. This legal research is a normative legal research approach that is carried out is the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The legal consequences for the minutes of the deed not possessed by the Notary in making a copy of the deed will cause the deed to be null and void by law because it violates the formal aspects in making the deed and the Notary does not carry out any of the obligations contained in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b of the UUJN. The legal consequences for the Notary will be given a sanction as a responsibility, namely civil, administrative and criminal sanctions.Keywords: notary obligation, minuta deed, copy deedAbstrakNotaris merupakan pejabat umum yang diangkat oleh Negara untuk melakukan tugas-tugas Negara dalam pelayanan hukum seperti membuat akta otentik. Dalam menjalankan tugas dan tanggung jawabnya  membuat akta otentik notaris terkadang melakukan kesalahan yang berdampak kepada sanksi perdata, aministratif dan pidana. Jika dilihat dalam Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf b UUJN bahwa minuta akta wajib dibuat dan disimpan sebagai bagian dari protokol Notaris. Tujuan dari penilitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pentingnya notaris untuk membuat minuta akta dalam pembuatan salinan aktanya. Bagaimana akibat yuridis terhadap minuta akta yang tidak dimiliki Notaris dalam pembuatan salinan aktanya, kemudian apa akibat hukum untuk Notaris yang tidak membuat minuta akta dalam pembuatan salinan aktanya. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif pendekatan yang dilakukan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Akibat hukum untuk minuta akta yang tidak dimiliki Notaris dalam pembuatan salinan aktanya akan menyebabkan akta tersebut batal demi hukum sebab melanggar aspek formil dalam pembuatan akta dan Notaris tidak melaksanakan salah satu kewajibannya yang ada di dalam Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf b UUJN. Akibat hukum bagi Notaris nantinya akan diberikan  sanksi sebagai pertanggungjawabannya yaitu sanksi perdata, administratif dan pidana.Kata kunci: kewajiban notaris, minuta akta, salinan akta


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1889
Author(s):  
Noerma Yulia Arianti

AbstractThis research entitled “Implikasi Dan Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Perkara Anak Yang Batal Demi Hukum” This study used a normative juridical method, a statutory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. This research aims to examine the legal consequences of a juvenile justice court decision that does not include social research report as the judge consideration? And legal remedies against a child's case verdict are null and void?. This study found that the legal consequence justice court ruling without a public research report will render the ruling null and void by law, which means the ruling has never been considered from the beginning, has no legal consequences and power, and from the beginning the verdict handed down has no execution power so it does not can be implemented, It is regulated under Article 60 of the Juvenile Justice System Law, because the report contains the socio-economic and physcological background of the juvenile and the recommendations given by the Penitentiary. While the legal remedies that can be taken is through an appeal procedure and judicial review.Keywords: Court Decision; Remedies; Social Research Report.AbstrakPenelitian ini berjudul “Implikasi Dan Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Perkara Anak Yang Batal Demi Hukum” yang dalam penulisannya menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu: (1) apa implikasi putusan pengadilan pidana anak tanpa mempertimbangkan laporan penelitian kemasyarakatan? (2) Apa upaya hukum terhadap putusan perkara anak yang batal demi hukum?. Implikasi putusan pengadilan pidana anak tanpa mempertimbangkan laporan penelitian kemasyarakatan akan membuat putusan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum yang artinya dari putusan tersebut sejak semula dianggap tidak pernah ada, tidak mempunyai akibat dan kekuatan hukum dan sejak semula putusan yang dijatuhkan sama sekali tidak mempunyai daya eksekusi sehingga tidak dapat dilaksanakan, hal tersebut diatur didalam Pasal 60 Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Anak, dikarenakan didalam laporan tersebut berisikan tentang keadan anak dan adanya rekomendasi yang diberikan oleh Balai Pemasyarakatan. Sedangkan upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh ketika putusan perkara anak tersebut ternyata batal demi hukum, maka jika pada saat proses peradilan berlangsung dapat mengajukan banding dan apabila baru diketahui pada saat putusan sudah dijalankan maka dapat mengajukan peninjauan kembali.Kata Kunci: Putusan Pengadilan; Pemulihan; Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan.


Author(s):  
Tyas Yuniawati Suroto ◽  
I Made Sarjana

This study aims to analyze the validity of the Motor Vehicle Owner's Book sale and purchase agreement on the Facebook application in relation to the principle of freedom of contract and to analyze the legal consequences of the Motor Vehicle Owner's Book sale and purchase agreement on the Facebook application which is expected to be a benchmark for how it should be regulated regarding selling and buy this Motor Vehicle Owner's Book in the future. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used are sources of primary legal materials, sources of secondary legal materials and sources of tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is an argumentative technique and descriptive analysis technique. The results of the research show that the sale and purchase agreement for a Motor Vehicle Owner's Book without a vehicle is a valid agreement as long as the agreement meets the legal requirements of an agreement set out in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. The legal consequence of this agreement is that it can be canceled if it does not meet the subjective requirements and is null and void if the objective conditions are not met. In the BPKB sale and purchase agreement without a vehicle, it is clear that if the objective conditions are not met, then the agreement is null and void or the existence of the agreement is deemed not to exist from the start. Studi ini bertujuan ini untuk menganalisis keabsahan perjanjian jual beli Buku Pemilik Kendaraan Bermotor pada aplikasi Facebook dikaitkan dengan asas kebebasan berkontrak serta menganalisis akibat hukum dari adanya perjanjian jual beli Buku Pemilik Kendaraan Bermotor pada aplikasi Facebook yang diharapkan akan menjadi tolak ukur mengenai bagaimana seharusnya diatur mengenai jual beli Buku Pemilik Kendaraan Bermotor ini di masa mendatang. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan   perundang-undangan  dan    pendekatan  konsep. Bahan  hukum  yang digunakan  adalah  sumber  bahan  hukum  primer,  sumber  bahan hukum   sekunder   dan   sumber   bahan   hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah  teknik argumentative serta teknik analisis deskriptif.  Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa perjanjian jual beli Buku Pemilik Kendaraan Bermotor tanpa disertai kendaraan merupakan perjanjian yang sah sepanjang perjanjian tersebut memenuhi syarat sahnya sebuah perjanjian yang tertuang di dalam Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Akibat hukum dari adanya perjanjian ini yaitu dapat dibatalkan apabila tidak memenuhi syarat subyektif dan batal demi hukum apabila syarat obyektifnya tidak terpenuhi. Dalam perjanjian jual beli BPKB tanpa kendaraan sudah jelas apabila syarat obyektifnya tidak terpenuhi maka perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum atau keberadaan perjanjian tersebut sejak awal dianggap tidak ada.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Krisna Kumala Dewi ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya

The heirs whose whereabouts cannot be determined are the heirs who have lost the news, so it is not known whether he is alive or dead. These are usually called missing persons. However, in fact, a lot of heirs ignore the inheritance rights of an heir whose existence cannot be determined. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of elaborating the arrangement of inheritance rights for heirs whose existence cannot be determined and the legal consequences for heirs whose existence is known after the inheritance is divided. This study used a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study showed that the existence of inheritance rights for heirs that cannot be determined is regulated in Article 463 of the Civil Code. The inheritance rights of heirs whose existence cannot be determined remain attached to it in accordance with the provisions of Article 467 of the Civil Code. However, as long as the whereabouts of the heir are not known, the position will be replaced by the successor heirs. Furthermore, as a legal consequence after an heir is known to exist, the replacement heir is obliged to return all the inherited assets received under the provisions of Article 482 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code.


Author(s):  
I Putu Dwika Ariestu

Human Rights and the State could not be separated from one another. Both are interconnected in terms of how to ensure internal stability in a country. With the existence of human rights, it is hoped that state is not arbitrary to treat its people and is obliged to protect everyone in its territory including in this case Stateless persons mentioned in Article 7 paragraph 1 of the Convention relating Status of Stateless Persons in 1954. This study aims to analyze the obligations the State must take in relation to the protection of persons with stateless persons status, and to recognize the legal consequences and responsibilities of States in the event of omitting acts of human rights violations against people with stateless persons status. This paper using normative research methods with statute approach and conceptual approach. The study shows that in relation to the obligation of the state that each State shall be obliged to provide protection to persons with stateless persons status as stipulated in the 1954 Convention and the provisions of the International Human Rights Law, the obligations of state protection include the protection of the right to life, the right to employment and even the right to obtain citizenship status. The international legal consequences accepted by the state are listed in Article 39, Article 41, and 42 of the UN Charter. Then for state responsibility are listed under Article 35, Article 36, and Article 37 of UNGA 56/83 of 2001.   Hak Asasi Manusia dan Negara tidak bisa dipisahkan satu sama lain. Keduanya saling terkait dalam hal bagaimana menjamin stabilitas internal di suatu negara. Dengan adanya hak asasi manusia, diharapkan negara tidak sewenang-wenang memperlakukan rakyatnya dan berkewajiban melindungi semua orang di wilayahnya termasuk dalam hal ini para warga negara yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 7 ayat 1 Konvensi terkait Status Orang Tanpa Negara di tahun 1954. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewajiban yang harus diambil Negara sehubungan dengan perlindungan orang-orang dengan status orang tanpa kewarganegaraan, dan untuk mengakui konsekuensi hukum serta tanggung jawab negara dalam hal melakukan  tindakan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia terhadap orang-orang dengan status  tanpa kewarganegaraan. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa sehubungan dengan kewajiban negara bahwa setiap Negara wajib memberikan perlindungan kepada orang-orang dengan status orang tanpa kewarganegaraan sebagaimana diatur dalam Konvensi 1954 dan ketentuan-ketentuan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional, kewajiban perlindungan negara termasuk perlindungan hak untuk hidup, hak untuk bekerja dan bahkan hak untuk mendapatkan status kewarganegaraan. Konsekuensi hukum internasional yang diterima oleh negara tercantum dalam Pasal 39, Pasal 41, dan 42 Piagam PBB. Kemudian untuk tanggung jawab negara tercantum di bawah Pasal 35, Pasal 36, dan Pasal 37 UNGA 56/83 tahun 2001.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document