scholarly journals Annual Report of preparatory activities for the evaluation of toxicity studies supporting the GM food/feed safety assessment, performed during the period 28/11/2018 to 5/12/2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibe Beltoft ◽  
Karin Nørby ◽  
Camilla Thyregod
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 457-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad H. Ibrahim ◽  
Md Shamsuddin Sultan Khan ◽  
Sawsan S. Al-Rawi ◽  
Mohamed B. Khadeer Ahamed ◽  
Aman Shah Bin Abdul Majid ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1773-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Parrott ◽  
Bruce Chassy ◽  
Jim Ligon ◽  
Linda Meyer ◽  
Jay Petrick ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 35-60 ◽  

Nonoxynols are chemically stable ethoxylated alkylphenols which are chemically foaming and solubilizing agents. Estimates of the acute oral LD50s of nine of the Nonoxynols (-2 to 15) range from 0.62 to 7.4 g/kg in several animal species. Acute dermal toxicity studies in rabbits produced an LD50 range of 1.8 ml/kg to 4.4 g/kg. Skin irritation tests on rabbits indicated that Nonoxynols are nonirritating to moderately irritating. Nonoxynol compounds with short ethoxylated chains are generally severe ocular irritants, whereas long-chained Nonoxynols are only slightly irritating to the rabbit eye. No evidence of carcinogenicity was observed when Nonoxynol-4 and 9 were fed to both dogs and rats. A mutagenicity study of these two compounds by the Ames test was negative. Undiluted Nonoxynol-4 and 9 were nonirritating and nonsensitizing in clinical studies. A 50% solution of Nonoxynol-15 and/or Nonoxynol-50 produced no irritation or sensitization when tested on 168 subjects, nor was there evidence of phototoxicity when tested on a subset of this population. It is concluded that Nonoxynols 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 30, 40, and 50 are safe as cosmetic ingredients.


Author(s):  
Mireille Kameni Poumeni ◽  
Danielle Claude Bilanda ◽  
Paul Désiré Dzeufiet Djomeni ◽  
Yolande Sandrine Mengue Ngadena ◽  
Marguerite Francine Mballa ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundLinn (MethodsAqueous extract ofResultsOur findings indicate dose-dependent elevation of nitrites contents in the flowers aqueous extract ofConclusionsdo not possesses neurotoxicity but is able to induce behavioral changes in rats. Therefore, the application of this plant as either drug or supplementary food should be carefully considered.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry A Kuiper ◽  
Esther J Kok ◽  
Karl-Heinz Engel

Toxins ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bailiang Li ◽  
Da Jin ◽  
Smith Etareri Evivie ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Fenfen Yan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 877-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Job Tchoumtchoua ◽  
Oumarou Riepouo Mouchili ◽  
Sylvin Benjamin Ateba ◽  
Stéphane Zingue ◽  
Maria Halabalaki ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 2393-2400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saoussen Turki ◽  
Zeineb Jabloun ◽  
Ghada Mrabet ◽  
Ammar Marouani ◽  
Philippe Thonart ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hanspeter Naegeli ◽  
Gijs Klete ◽  
Antje Dietz-Pfeilstetter

Abstract This paper evaluates the potential hazards of food and feed derived from RNAi plants including: adverse changes of plant metabolism; mechanisms and potential for non-target gene silencing in humans and livestock, including gut microbiome; bioinformatics tools for predictionof off-target sequences of interfering RNA; the possible non-specific effects of dsRNA and siRNA in mammals; and the comparison of data requirements for safety assessment of food and feed from RNAi plants and from plants expressing recombinant proteins. It also discusses exposure and RNAi-specific risk assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document