scholarly journals The Effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism On The Financial Performance of Banking Companies Listed In Stock Exchange Indonesia 2012-2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
Desi Pipian Pujakusum

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance mechanism on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2012-2016 period. The corporate governance mechanism is proxied by the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee size, the board of director's education, and the board of commissioner’s education. The company's financial performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). Samples were taken by using purposive sampling. The total number of samples used in this study amounted to 180 research samples. This study was tested with SPSS 20 program. Data analysis technique used in this research is simple regression analysis.  The results showed that the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, and audit comitee size have a significant effect on return on assets. These three factors have a significant effect on return on assets, while the board of commissioners education and the board of director's education have no significant effect on return on assets.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Amrina Rosada

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Performance at Islamic Banks. The independent variable in this study is Good Corporate Governance as measured by the board of directors, the independent board of commissioners, the islamic supervisory board and the audit committee. The population in this study were 11 Islamic commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research data was obtained from the annual report for 2015-2019. The results showed that the audit committee has an effect on financial performance as measured by return on assets, while the board of directors, independent commissioners, and islamic supervisory board has no effect on financial performance as measured by return on assets. Together the board of directors, independent commissioners, islamic supervisory board and audit committee have an effect on return on asset.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Mira Diyanty ◽  
Meina Wulansari Yusniar

<em><span lang="EN-US">The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the Good Corporate Governance mechanism on the board of commissioners, the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the audit committee, CAR on ROA. This study also uses a purposive sampling method for sampling. The analysis test used is multiple linear regression analysis. The population used by companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011 - 2013 and which meet the sample selection criteria. The sample used was 25 companies. Data is collected through secondary data collection in the form of the company's annual report for the period 2011 - 2013 which is published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research hypothesis was tested by multiple linear regression which had met the testing of classical assumptions. The results of the analysis show that the board of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committees, CAR does not significantly influence ROA while the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on ROA.</span></em>


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunni Fauztina Sahhyla ◽  
Sulistyo Sulistyo ◽  
Rita Indah Mustikowati

This study aims to determine the effect of good corporate governance mechanisms and company profitability on bond ratings. The population used in this study is companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2015 and the sample determination method used is purposive judgment sampling. Samples obtained were 32 bond issuing companies. Data analysis techniques used are descriptive analysis, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression test, and hypothesis testing. This study found that simultaneous mechanisms of good corporate governance and corporate profitability affect bond ratings. Partially, this study found that the mechanism of good corporate governance that was proxied by the board of directors (DD), audit committee (KA), company size (UK), board of directors (DK) and profitability that was proxied by Return on Assets affected the bond rating, whereas Managerial ownership (KM), institutional ownership (IC) have no effect on bond ratings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-138
Author(s):  
Masiyah Kholmi ◽  
Muhammad Nizzam Zein Susadi

This research has a purpose to analysis the effect of good corporate governance mechanism and ownership structures on the disclosure of sustainability reports. Purposive sampling method was applied sampling technique certain of criteria. The sample is 47 companies from a population of 627 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2018. Data collection techniques used the documentation method. This research uses data analysis tools with the Smart PLS 3 application to test hypotheses. The results showed that the variables of good corporate governance mechanisms that were proxied by the audit committee, the independent board of commissioners, and the board of directors had a significant effect on the disclosure of sustainability reports, ownership structure variables that were proxied with managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and foreign ownership also affected the disclosure of sustainability reports


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadya Ayu Saputri ◽  
Rochmi Widayanti ◽  
Ratna Damayanti

The purpose of the study was to analyze the effect of the application of good corporate governance, which was governed by the board of commissioners, board of directors, audit committee and institutional ownership of financial performance which was interpreted by the return on asset ratio in banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2017. The total population is 43 companies, using purpose sampling techniques obtained by a sample of 25 companies. While the analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. The results show that only the audit committee that has no significant effect, the board of commissioners has a significant negative effect on the board of directors and institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on financial performance. Other results show that simultaneous application of good corporate governance has a significant influence on financial performance. Keyword: good corporate governance, financial performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-20
Author(s):  
Yushita Marini ◽  
Nisha Marina

This study aimed to get empirical evidence regarding the corporate governance mechanism proxied by the size of the board of commisioners, independent directors, the size of the board of directors and audit committees that affect the value of the company. This study using purposive sampling method for collecting samples of the companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange that publish the complete annual financial statements for 2010-2014, have the data necessary corporate governance in research, the company has never delisted and present its financial statements in Indonesian Rupiah , From the analysis of the study showed that the size of the board of commisioners, independent directors, and the size of the board of directors affect the value of the company, while the audit committee does not affect the value of the company.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Ari Susanti ◽  
Sri Lestari

This study aims to examine the effect of implementing good corporate governance as measured by an independent board of commissioners, board of directors, and audit committee on financial performance measured using Return of Equity (ROE). This research uses quantitative research. The population in this study are manufacturing companies in the basic and chemical industry sectors that consistently publish financial reports on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2018. Based on the purposive sampling method, a sample of 11 companies is obtained each year to obtain 33 observational data. The data in this study use warpPLS 6.0 software. The results of this study indicate that the independent board of commissioners, the board of directors affect the financial performance, while the audit committee has no effect on financial performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-34
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Kompiyang Ratih Maldini ◽  
Pananda Pasaribu ◽  
Christian Haposan Pangaribuan

Objective – This study aims to find the impact of privatization, which proxied by good corporate governance toward the financial performance of SOEs in Indonesia. Methodology – This study used 16 privatized SOEs that are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and also 16 privatized non-SOEs as the comparison. The data is collected from the year 2014 to 2018 and analyzed by using multiple regression panel data. Findings – This study found that director size and board independence have a positive impact toward SOEs financial performance. The director size and board independences have a positive significant impact toward the SOEs financial performance while the privatized non-SOEs is not significantly affected Novelty – This study examines proper governance structure in SOEs and non-SOEs, thus providing new insights about good corporate governance regulation in the Indonesian context.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Ahmad Azmy, Dea Restiya Anggreini, Mohammad Hamim

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on company profitability. The dependent variable are Return On Assets (ROA) and Return On Equity (ROE). The independent variable are Good Corporate Governance (GCG) represented by the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee. This study uses secondary data from audited financial statements of Real Estate and Property companies in 2013-2017. The analytical tool used in this study uses panel data regression. Based on the results of the study it is known that the Board of Directors and Audit Committee variables have a significant positive effect on ROA and ROE. The Board of Commissioners variable has no influence and negative relationship to ROA and ROE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 01-24
Author(s):  
Muhammad Noman Ansari ◽  
◽  
Dr. Sayed Fayaz Ahmed

The corporate governance measures emphasize on presence of independence of the board of directors to bring objectivity and reducing the agency cost; whereas the institutions have the ability, skills and time to supervise the activities of the management and channelize it to better financial performance. The objective of this study is to explore the effect of independence of the board of directors on the financial performance of the firms. The independence was gauged by number of independent directors and non-executive directors, chairing of board committees by independent directors, institutional holding in the firm, and presence of institutional directors on the board. The financial performance of the firm is gauged using the return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA). The corporate governance and financial performance data comprising of 75 firm years from 2014 to 2018 of the firms listed in the cement sector of the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) were selected. GLM regression was performed to study the relationship between the variables. The results suggest that the majority of independence on the board of directors do not affect the financial performance of the firm; the independence in the board committees negatively affects the financial performance, whereas the presence of institutional holding and director in the firm does not have any effect on the performance of the firm. The study will provide a basis for future studies to find the association that independence can bring objectivity, reduce agency cost, and affect the performance of the firm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document