Faculty Opinions recommendation of Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Dual Systems ◽  
Temporal Cognition ◽  
Systems Perspective

scholarly journals A dual-systems perspective on temporal cognition: Implications for the role of emotion

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip M. Nuyens ◽  
Mark D. Griffiths
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Events ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Temporal Cognition ◽  
Systems Perspective ◽  
Reasoning System ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Arousal Effect

Abstract This commentary explores how emotion fits in the dual-systems model of temporal cognition proposed by Hoerl & McCormack. The updating system would be affected by emotion via the attentional/arousal effect according to the attentional gate model. The reasoning system would be disrupted by emotion, especially for traumatic events. Time discrepancies described in the dual-systems model are also explained.

Understanding social networking site (SNS) identity from a dual systems perspective: an investigation of the dark side of SNS use

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 600-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greta L. Polites ◽  
Christina Serrano ◽  
Jason Bennett Thatcher ◽  
Kevin Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Social Networking ◽  
Social Networking Site ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Systems Perspective

Good habits gone bad: Explaining negative consequences associated with the use of mobile phones from a dual-systems perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr A. Soror ◽  
Bryan I. Hammer ◽  
Zachary R. Steelman ◽  
Fred D. Davis ◽  
Moez M. Limayem
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Systems Perspective

Updating the dual systems model of temporal cognition: Reasoning with dynamic systems theory

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Hohenberger
Keyword(s):  
Systems Theory ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Dynamic Systems ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Temporal Reasoning ◽  
Dynamic Systems Theory ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Temporal Cognition ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Two Systems

Abstract This commentary construes the relation between the two systems of temporal updating and temporal reasoning as a bifurcation and tracks it across three time scales: phylogeny, ontogeny, and microgeny. In taking a dynamic systems approach, flexibility, as mentioned by Hoerl & McCormack, is revealed as the key characteristic of human temporal cognition.

Closing the symbolic reference gap to support flexible reasoning about the passage of time

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle DeNigris ◽  
Patricia J. Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Development ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Developmental Processes ◽  
Time Line ◽  
Systems Perspective ◽  
Mental Time Line ◽  
Representational Redescription

Abstract This commentary relates Hoerl & McCormack's dual systems perspective to models of cognitive development emphasizing representational redescription and the role of culturally constructed tools, including language, in providing flexible formats for thinking. We describe developmental processes that enable children to construct a mental time line, situate themselves in time, and overcome the primacy of the here and now.

Thinking about time and number: An application of the dual-systems approach to numerical cognition

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karoline Lohse ◽  
Elena Sixtus ◽  
Jan Lonnemann
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Cognition ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Temporal Reasoning ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Temporal Cognition ◽  
Time Space

Abstract Based on the notion that time, space, and number are part of a generalized magnitude system, we assume that the dual-systems approach to temporal cognition also applies to numerical cognition. Referring to theoretical models of the development of numerical concepts, we propose that children's early skills in processing numbers can be described analogously to temporal updating and temporal reasoning.

Ego Depletion Moderates the Influence of Automatic and Controlled Precursors of Reactive Aggression

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander F. Schmidt ◽  
Philipp S. Zimmermann ◽  
Rainer Banse ◽  
Roland Imhoff
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Reactive Aggression ◽  
Ego Depletion ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Implicit Measure ◽  
Acting Out ◽  
Implicit Measures ◽  
Dual Systems ◽  
Taylor Aggression Paradigm ◽  
Systems Perspective

From a dual-systems perspective, it has been proposed that predictive validity of whether individuals act out or stifle their reactive aggression will be maximized if (a) automatic and (b) controlled precursors of aggression are assessed and (c) situational boundaries in favor of acting out or restraining oneself are specified. In the present research we experimentally manipulated participants’ self-regulatory efforts in an ego depletion paradigm and subsequently measured reactive aggression in the Taylor Aggression Paradigm. Assessing automatic and controlled precursors of reactive aggression via an Implicit Association Test of Aggressiveness (Agg-IAT) and self-report reactive aggressiveness questionnaire, respectively, we demonstrated a theoretically expected double dissociation: Reactive aggression of ego depleted individuals was predicted by the implicit measure whereas non-depleted participants’ reactive aggression was predicted by their explicit self-reports. The results corroborate the usefulness of both explicit and implicit measures of aggressiveness and point to boundary conditions of these measures’ predictive validity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document