scholarly journals Specific features of government regulation of Ukraine’s agriculture market

2019 ◽  
pp. 36-46
Author(s):  
Viktoriia Melnyk
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Government Investment ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Products Analysis ◽  
The Government ◽  
Main Components

Introduction. The necessity of government regulation of Ukraine’s agriculture market is determined by the unique features of Ukrainian agricultural sector and its significance for the food safety. The structural transformations of the internal and external environments have had a major impact on the development of agriculture and the national economy as a whole. Since the current challenges are getting deeper in the conditions of globalization processes, the research of this issue is of relevance. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to provide a rationale for theoretical, methodological and strategic principles of government regulation of agriculture at this point of time. Methods. The theoretical and methodological framework of the study includes the dialectic method of thinking and a holistic integrated approach to the issue of government regulation of Ukraine’s agriculture market. The methods of deduction, analysis and synthesis are used to study the concepts of government regulation of agriculture market and its basic components, namely, market, government, regulation, agricultural products. Analysis and monographic method are used to identify specific features of government regulation of agricultural production with respect to international practices of government regulation. Logical grouping is applied for describing the key trends in the development and support of agricultural sector. Results. The article systematizes and describes specific features of government regulation of agriculture market with regard to its main components, namely, market, government, regulation, agricultural production. The author considers the factors that determine distinctive features of government regulation of agriculture in Ukraine, taking into account world experience in government regulation. Within the context of discussing government regulation of agriculture market, special attention is drawn to government investment and innovation policy. The strategic areas of government regulation of agribusiness operation and development are described. The paper suggests ways of improving government performance and increasing its efficiency in enhancing Ukraine’s agricultural production. It is determined that government regulation of agricultural production is implemented through a set of measures that are aimed at promoting better conditions for producing agricultural goods. At present, the main areas of development and support for the agricultural sector by the government and the key goals of government regulation of agriculture include: quality assurance and competitiveness of domestic agricultural production; conservation and restoration of natural resources; creation of an effective market and development of its infrastructure. Discussion. The article claims that further studies should be aimed at seeking innovative techniques of institutional transformations, which create a basis for effective agriculture market.

Assessing the Efficiency of Russian Business Support Institutions in the Digital Economy

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 593-602
Author(s):  
O. V. Burgonov ◽  
E. V. Mikhaylov
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Government Support ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Business Structures ◽  
The Government ◽  
Space Infrastructure ◽  
Medium Enterprises

Aim. The presented study aims to determine methodological approaches to assessing the efficiency of government regulation and support of small and medium enterprises in the context of the digitalization of the economy, to propose directions for its improvement, and to consider institutions and tools that could contribute to solving the problems of small enterprises in the post-COVID period.Tasks. The authors examine the major problems in the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Russia, potential opportunities and solutions; analyze the main problems of SME support; determine indicators and criteria for evaluating the efficiency of this type of national and municipal administration.Methods. This study uses the methods of abstraction and aggregation, historical analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, systemic and structural approaches.Results. The results of the study prove that the assessment of the efficiency of government regulation and support of small and medium enterprises in the context of the digitalization of the economy should be considered not only using KPI, but also by applying extended criteria and indicators at various management levels as part of an integrated approach. This makes it possible to determine why SMEs, which traditionally experience a lack of financial resources, use government support mechanisms to such a small extent.Conclusions. In Russia, government support is provided to SMEs in the form of guarantees and benefits, subsidization of the costs of leasing contracts and participation in advertising campaigns and exhibitions, co-funding of regional system-forming business projects. At the same time, the most important factor in optimizing the system of government regulation and support of entrepreneurship is the creation of digital space infrastructure to increase the efficiency of interaction between the government and business structures, since the existing system is not optimal.

scholarly journals Electronic form of procurement in agricultural enterprises

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 00127
Author(s):  
Anna Volkonskaya ◽  
Olga Pashkina ◽  
Natalia Galenko ◽  
Oleg Kurlikov ◽  
Velta Parsova
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Electronic Trading ◽  
Agricultural Enterprises ◽  
Electronic Form ◽  
Agricultural Performance ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Main Components ◽  
Developing System ◽  
State Enterprises

Today in Russia the main components of digital economy are as follows: electronic trading, public services, export-import activity and constantly developing system of purchasing activity at state enterprises. The system of purchases has to conform to the requirements of modern digital technologies For this purpose at the end of 2018 the President of the Russian Federation proposed to transfer the government and corporate procurement to an electronic form. However, the analysis showed that procurement activities carried out in the form of electronic bidding in agricultural enterprises had a number of problems. These problems are related to the nature of agriculture. For example, seasonality is a key to agricultural performance. In this regard, the system of commercial transactions, including electronic trades, should be as adapted as possible to the peculiarities of agricultural production.

Strategic Management as a Basis of Sustainable Development in Agricultural Production

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 523-529
Author(s):  
T. V. Simonyan ◽  
N. V. Shvydenko
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Strategic Management ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Cluster Structure ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
The Sustainable Development ◽  
Russian Economy

Aim. The presented study aims to substantiate a structural model for developing a sustainable development strategy in agricultural production, making allowance for changes in the level of impact of environmental factors.Tasks. The authors determine the reasons why the Russian agro-industrial complex (AIC) is lagging; identify the specific aspects of forming a strategy for the sustainable development of regional AICs; formulate urgent problems of sustainable development for the agri-food sector of the Russian economy at the federal, regional, and enterprise levels.Methods. This study uses a reasonable and objective approach to the problem of applying strategic management as a foundation for the sustainable development of agricultural production based on the knowledge of the laws of development of socio-ecological and economic systems and a study of multidirectional factors of the external and internal environment. The methodological basis for the sustainable development of agricultural production includes the concept of sustainable development as a priority at the macroeconomic level; strategy as a planning tool based on consistency with programs implemented at the federal, regional and municipal levels of public administration; methods and tools of strategic management at AIC enterprises.Results. The key aspects of the institutional-synergetic approach to the sustainable development of the AIC include the need to coordinate all factors by forming coherent goals not only among economic and financial institutions, but also for technopolises that combine scientific, industrial, financial, and entrepreneurial capital into one system cluster structure. The authors formulate the stages of implementing a strategy for the sustainable development of regional AICs, making it possible to come up with measures aimed at reorganizing the structure of the agricultural sector and to overcome the negative manifestations of crises in the Russian economy, thus minimizing their consequences.Conclusions. During the development of a strategy for the sustainable development of regional AICs, a multiplicative effect arises, making it possible to activate innovation policy and boost the development of other sectors of the economy, improving the population’s quality of life. When developing a strategy at the microeconomic level, it is necessary to make allowance for the specifics of the industry and the mission of a modern agro-industrial enterprise and to focus on solving problems formulated based on the trinity of goals of social, environmental, and economic long-term sustainable development.

scholarly journals INNOVATIVE TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (40) ◽  
pp. 216-224
Author(s):  
О. Yatsenko ◽  
Y. Zavadska ◽  
O. Khrystenko ◽  
T. Musiiets ◽  
O. Aksyonova
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Global Market ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Clustering Model ◽  
Food Taking

Abstract. It is determined that ensuring food security and healthy nutrition for the growing population of the planet will remain a challenge for the world community. The global dominants and tendencies of development of agro-production activity within the global market of agro-food products are analyzed. The grouping of leading countries with a highly innovative agro-industrial sector, which is formed taking into account the goals of sustainable development based on the construction of a clustering model using the K-Means algorithm is done. Their experience of formation of the state policy directed for support of innovative transformations of agrarian and industrial complex is generalized and recommendations on implementation of their best achievements in the domestic agricultural sector are offered. The aim of the work is a comprehensive assessment of innovative transformations taking place in the agricultural sector in the context of the challenges of global sustainable development. The task of the research is to determine the most successful group of countries in terms of implementation of intensification of production activities, the effectiveness of innovation policy and the ability to meet the demand for food, taking into account the requirements of sustainable development; providing recommendations for the modernization of agricultural production of domestic producers. The following methods of scientific research were used to achieve the goal and solve the problems of the article: system analysis, forecasting, generalization, modeling, namely clustering by the K-Means algorithm, etc. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is to provide comprehensive recommendations for the formation of domestic public policy aimed at supporting innovative transformations in the agroindustrial sector, based on key factors and determinants of its development and taking into account the best practices of leading countries in this field.Keywords: agricultural production, innovations, sustainable development, state support.JEL Classification O13, O39, Q01, Q17, F63Formulas: 0; fig.: 2; tabl.: 2; bibl.: 20.

scholarly journals Dinamika Kelembagaan Sumberdaya Lahan dan Konsekuensinya bagi Pembangunan Sektor Pertanian

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Iwan Setiajie Anugrah
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Production Factor ◽  
Resource Utilisation ◽  
Land Resource ◽  
Land Utilization ◽  
Current Time ◽  
The Government ◽  
Performance Development

<p><strong>English</strong><br />The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive information on performance development and problems associated with land resource utilisation and its future management perspective. The coverage of discussion to identify such objectives could be divided as follows: (1) perception and concept of land resource, (2) the development of land resource, (3) the importance of land resource, (4) land resource and agricultural production stability, and (5) discussion on policy alternatives to overcome land resource problems. Some important findings could be described as follows: (1) various concepts and ideas on land resource have led to a thought that land resource has social, economic, political values, and a symbol at a certain level as a production factor in agricultural sector, (2) land resource development has changed land resource institutions, land fragmentation, land transfer to other non-agricultural utilization, land value improvement, and polarization and absentee practices, (3) various development activities has reflected the importance of land resource and the highly competitiveness of land utilization in line to the importance of each activity and each sector, (4) acting as a stabilizer in agricultural production, the land resource has faced many problems both in current time or in the future especially those associated with agricultural land degradation reducing land fertileness that ended in marginal land accumulation, in the mean time, food-self sufficiency should be continuously maintained, (5) although all problems on land affairs have been arranged in the UUPA since September 1960; Keppres No. 53/1989 or Keppres No. 33/1990, the problems continually appeared. In this regard, governor, based on Permendagri No. 15/1975, as an officer authorized to issue land utility permit, should launched policies which are very much expected to harmonize the central and local requests, the government and the people, agricultural and nonagricultural sectors, or individual/group requests and the society's needs on land resource.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Indonesian</strong><br />Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi tentang perkembangan keragaan dan permasalahan pemanfaatan sumberdaya lahan serta perspektif penanganannya di masa datang. Identifikasi ke arah tersebut dilakukan melalui beberapa subpokok bahasan yang meliputi : (1) persepsi dan konsepsi terhadap sumberdaya lahan, (2) perkembangan sumberdaya lahan berdasarkan waktu, (3) kepentingan terhadap sumberdaya lahan, (4) sumberdaya lahan dan stabilitas produksi pertanian, dan (5) pemikiran terhadap kebijaksanaan dalam mengatasi permasalahan sumberdaya lahan. Beberapa temuan penting yang perlu dikemukakan adalah : (1) beragamnya konsep serta pandangan sumberdaya lahan dalam arti luas memberikan gambaran bahwa sumberdaya lahan mempunyai fungsi sosial ekonomi, politik, serta simbol status tertentu selain sebagai faktor produksi di sektor pertanian, (2) perkembangan sumberdaya lahan berdasarkan waktu telah membawa perubahan terhadap kelembagaan sumberdaya lahan dengan adanya kegiatan fragmentasi lahan, alih fungsi lahan pertanian ke nonpertanian, peningkatan nilai lahan, terjadinya polarisasi ataupun praktek-praktek absentee, (3) adanya berbagai kegiatan pembangunan menjadikan sumber daya lahan sebagai asset yang cukup penting, sehingga terjadi persaingan penggunaan yang cukup meningkat sesuai dengan kepentingan antar aktivitas maupun antar sektoral, (4) sebagai stabilisator bagi produksi pertanian, sumberdaya lahan dihadapkan pada persoalan yang cukup berat baik saat ini dan juga di masa yang akan datang terutama dengan meningkatnya degradasi lahan pertanian, penyusutan lahan produktif yang digantikan dengan lahan marjinal, sementara kebutuhan akan swasembada pangan tetap harus dipertahankan, (5) walaupun secara yuridis permasalahan pertanahan telah diatur dalam UUPA sejak September 1960, Keppres No.53/1989 ataupun Keppres No.33/1990, persoalan mengenai lahan tetap meningkat. Untuk itu kebijaksanaan dari gubernur sebagai pejabat yang berwenang dalam pemberian izin penggunaan lahan sesuai dengan keputusan Permendagri No.15 Tahun 1975 sangat diharapkan sekaligus mampu menselaraskan perbedaan kepentingan antara pusat dengan daerah, penguasa dengan rakyat, sektor pertanian dengan nonpertanian, ataupun kepentingan individu/golongan dengan masyarakat luas terhadap kebutuhan sumberdaya lahan.</p>

On the essence of management forms manifolds in agrarian sphere at institutional reformation

10.12737/6497 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Хисматуллин ◽  
Marsel Khismatullin ◽  
Хафизов ◽  
Dafik Khafizov
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Continuous Process ◽  
Agricultural Producers ◽  
Agrarian Policy ◽  
The Government ◽  
Considerable Work ◽  
Effective Development

An increase the efficiency of agricultural production is the most important economic issue at the present stage. However, according to the authors’ opinion, the sharpness of the problem for a long time is underestimated and continues to be underestimated in the agrarian policy of the country. The consequences of such attitude to the problems of agricultural development particularly had a negative impact on the results of the agricultural producers in 1991-1998 years, when investment in agriculture was sharply reduced, the production potential of the sector has been undermined. The agricultural production fell by 50%, compared to the pre-reform period, 88% of agricultural organizations were unprofitable. During 1999 - 2013 years, the government of the country, scientists carried out considerable work to ensure the effective development of agriculture. But, nevertheless, in 2013, the level of agricultural production was by 10.3% lower, than in the pre-reform 1990 year, the financials continue to worsen. According to the authors, so that to ensure the conditions for agricultural producers for effective functioning, expanded reproduction, it requires substantially to increase the level of state support to agriculture, to improve the economic mechanism of management, to develop management forms manifolds, under which we mean a rational, mutually reinforcing combination of different forms of management, based on different forms of ownership, ensuring the efficient use of available natural, labour, material and financial resources. In the paper the author’s definition of management forms is given. The development of forms of management and ownership in the agricultural sector should be seen as a continuous process. The composition and structure of the management forms in the agrarian sector will be updated with the development of market relations, economic conditions change.

scholarly journals AGRICULTURAL SEED FINANCING: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND EXPORT EARNINGS FOR NIGERIA ECONOMY

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 228-245
Author(s):  
ZUBERU ◽  
ILIYA ◽  
YUSUF ◽  
SALIHU
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Agricultural Productivity ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Agricultural Export ◽  
The Government ◽  
Production Output

Since the discovery of oil, there has been a drastic decline in agricultural exports as percentage of total exports declined from about 43% to slightly over 7% between 1970 and 1974, as a result of the oil price shocks of 1973 – 1974 which resulted in large receipts of foreign exchange earnings by Nigeria and the neglect of agriculture. There have been series of declines in agricultural export since the mid-1970s at an average annual decline rate of 17 percent and by 1996, agricultural export accounted for only 2 percent of total exports, hence, making Nigeria net importer of basic food stuff. With this continual decline, the agricultural sector no longer earns enough foreign exchange through exports. Hence, this study investigates implications of agricultural seed financing on increased productivity output and export earnings in Nigeria. The choice of research design employed in this study is the archival and documentary research strategy, associated with the deductive approach, which involved secondary data collection. The population comprised 16 years data on total annual financial expenditure on agricultural seed improvement, agricultural productivity output and export earnings from 2000 to 2015 (16 years). Secondary data on cumulative annual expenditure on seed financing (SIF), Agricultural productivity (AP) indicator and export earnings (EE) were employed. The findings revealed that, findings revealed that Seed improvement financing has a significant impact on increased Agricultural production output and that there is a significant relationship between Agricultural production output and increased export earnings in Nigeria. The study therefore recommended that, there is need for the government to increase funding for agricultural research and also access international grants, as this will help increase variety of high yield seeds and subsequently increase agricultural production output, which will increase agro related export earnings in Nigeria.

scholarly journals Analysis of determinants of maize price variations in Nigeria (1978 - 2014)

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-234
Author(s):  
Opeyemi Eyitayo Ayinade ◽  
Ifedotun Victor Aina ◽  
Kayode Ayinade
Keyword(s):  
Food Security ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Price Change ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Price Variation ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
The Government ◽  
Food Staples

Skyrocketing prices of food staples such as maize can lead to inefficient agricultural production and definitely have detrimental effects on the economic, social, and political growth of any country. Most studies on maize in Nigeria are focused on the increasing consumption or competitiveness, very few address the determinants of maize price change as a panacea for the increase of productivity. Filling this gap requires a study on the various factors that contribute to the variations in the price of maize. In this study, secondary data were used. The study used descriptive statistics tools to analyze the pattern of price variations and changes in the production of maize over a period of 36 years in Nigeria. Also, various factors affecting price variation of maize were examined. It was recommended that the positive and significant impact of country’s population to maize price change should serve as an impulse to encourage investment in agricultural sector of Nigeria in order to ensure food security in the country. Also, the government should use the inflation measures to regulate prices of maize in the country

scholarly journals Impact of farm protectionism on the use of agricultural inputs in Chile

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0107
Author(s):  
Gabriel Pino ◽  
Ariel Soto-Caro
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Interesting Case ◽  
Agricultural Labor ◽  
Working Capital ◽  
Agricultural Protectionism ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Despite evidence highlighting the multiple benefits that liberalization can have in the agricultural sector, agricultural protectionism is abundant, especially in developing countries. Chile provides an interesting case on this topic because it implemented an aggressive liberalization in the agricultural sector during the 1970s and 1980s. This paper analyzes the impact of farm protectionism on the use of agricultural inputs in Chile. To do this, we estimated partial elasticities of substitution by incorporating government protectionism as a factor for agricultural production. Our findings reveal that increased protectionism decreases agricultural labor and promotes the use of fixed capital. In contrast, protectionism has no effect on the use of working capital and land. This information shows a clear transference from the government to farmers. Furthermore, our results are useful for anticipating the effects that varying levels of government protectionism can have on the Chilean agricultural sector over time.

scholarly journals Risk Management in Agricultural Holdings in Bulgaria

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-83
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Methodological Framework ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Risk Management Process ◽  
Risk Management Strategies ◽  
Process Risk ◽  
The Government

The developing uncertainties, risks and crises related to the natural environment, technology, economic and political environment, as well as globalization, still pose a challenge to addressing risk management in the agricultural sector in Bulgaria. The purpose of the article is to make an analysis of risk management in agricultural holdings and, on this basis, to identify generalized conclusions and suggestions for improving the process. Risk management often depends on the economic activities and internal attitudes of farm managers. The methodological framework of the study includes: 1) Theoretical review of risk management in the agricultural sector, identifying the sources of uncertainty and risk, the ability of farmers to use different risk management strategies, as well as the dependence of risk management on the perceptions of farmers and the measures taken by the government; 2) Methodological framework of the study of risk management in agricultural holdings; 3) Recommendations for improving the risk management process. The analyses in the article present the results of university project NI 16/2018 Integrated approach to risk management in the agricultural sector.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document