scholarly journals Combinatorial Reductions for the Stanley Depth of $I$ and $S/I$

10.37236/6783 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchel T. Keller ◽  
Stephen J. Young
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Monomial Ideal ◽  
Strict Inequality ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Computer Search ◽  
Stanley Depth ◽  
The Relationship

We develop combinatorial tools to study the relationship between the Stanley depth of a monomial ideal $I$ and the Stanley depth of its compliment, $S/I$. Using these results we are able to prove that if $S$ is a polynomial ring with at most 5 indeterminates and $I$ is a square-free monomial ideal, then the Stanley depth of $S/I$ is strictly larger than the Stanley depth of $I$. Using a computer search, we are able to extend this strict inequality up to polynomial rings with at most 7 indeterminates. This partially answers questions asked by Propescu and Qureshi as well as Herzog.

On Stanley Depths of Certain Monomial Factor Algebras

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-401
Author(s):  
Zhongming Tang
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Monomial Ideal ◽  
Primary Decomposition ◽  
Factor Algebra ◽  
Stanley Depth ◽  
Stanley Conjecture ◽  
Stanley Decomposition

AbstractLet S = K[x1 , . . . , xn] be the polynomial ring in n-variables over a ûeld K and I a monomial ideal of S. According to one standard primary decomposition of I, we get a Stanley decomposition of the monomial factor algebra S/I. Using this Stanley decomposition, one can estimate the Stanley depth of S/I. It is proved that sdepthS(S/I) ≤ sizeS(I). When I is squarefree and bigsizeS(I) ≤ 2, the Stanley conjecture holds for S/I, i.e., sdepthS(S/I) ≥ depthS(S/I).

scholarly journals Stanley’s conjecture for critical ideals

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Azeem Haider ◽  
Sardar Khan
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Hilbert Function ◽  
Monomial Ideal ◽  
Monomial Ideals ◽  
Stanley Depth

Let S = K[x1,…,xn] be a polynomial ring in n variables over a field K. Stanley’s conjecture holds for the modules I and S/I, when I ⊂ S is a critical monomial ideal. We calculate the Stanley depth of S/I when I is a canonical critical monomial ideal. For non-critical monomial ideals we show the existence of a Stanley ideal with the same depth and Hilbert function.

ON THE STANLEY DEPTH AND SIZE OF MONOMIAL IDEALS

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 705-715
Author(s):  
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Monomial Ideal ◽  
Recursive Formula ◽  
Monomial Ideals ◽  
Stanley Depth

AbstractLet $\mathbb{K}$ be a field and S = ${\mathbb{K}}$[x1, . . ., xn] be the polynomial ring in n variables over the field $\mathbb{K}$. For every monomial ideal I ⊂ S, we provide a recursive formula to determine a lower bound for the Stanley depth of S/I. We use this formula to prove the inequality sdepth(S/I) ≥ size(I) for a particular class of monomial ideals.

scholarly journals Elasticity in Polynomial-Type Extensions

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Batell ◽  
Jim Coykendall
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Irreducible Polynomial ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Polynomial Type ◽  
Factorial Domain ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractThe elasticity of an atomic integral domain is, in some sense, a measure of how far the domain is from being a half-factorial domain. We consider the relationship between the elasticity of a domain R and the elasticity of its polynomial ring R[x]. For example, if R has at least one atom, a sufficient condition for the polynomial ring R[x] to have elasticity 1 is that every non-constant irreducible polynomial f ∈ R[x] be irreducible in K[x]. We will determine the integral domains R whose polynomial rings satisfy this condition.

Affine Actions of Uq(sl(2)) on Polynomial Rings

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-240
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Bergen
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Scalar Multiplication ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Affine Actions

AbstractWe classify the affine actions of Uq(sl(2)) on commutative polynomial rings in m ≥ 1 variables. We show that, up to scalar multiplication, there are two possible actions. In addition, for each action, the subring of invariants is a polynomial ring in either m or m−1 variables, depending upon whether q is or is not a root of 1.

scholarly journals Stanley depth and symbolic powers of monomial ideals

2017 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Seyed Fakhari
Keyword(s):  
Monomial Ideal ◽  
Monomial Ideals ◽  
Limit Behavior ◽  
Stanley Depth ◽  
Symbolic Powers

The aim of this paper is to study the Stanley depth of symbolic powers of a squarefree monomial ideal. We prove that for every squarefree monomial ideal $I$ and every pair of integers $k, s\geq 1$, the inequalities $\mathrm{sdepth} (S/I^{(ks)}) \leq \mathrm{sdepth} (S/I^{(s)})$ and $\mathrm{sdepth}(I^{(ks)}) \leq \mathrm{sdepth} (I^{(s)})$ hold. If moreover $I$ is unmixed of height $d$, then we show that for every integer $k\geq1$, $\mathrm{sdepth}(I^{(k+d)})\leq \mathrm{sdepth}(I^{{(k)}})$ and $\mathrm{sdepth}(S/I^{(k+d)})\leq \mathrm{sdepth}(S/I^{{(k)}})$. Finally, we consider the limit behavior of the Stanley depth of symbolic powers of a squarefree monomial ideal. We also introduce a method for comparing the Stanley depth of factors of monomial ideals.

Jacobson Radicals of Skew Polynomial Rings of Derivation Type

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Nasr-Isfahani
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Jacobson Radical ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Skew Polynomial Ring ◽  
Skew Polynomial Rings ◽  
Base Ring ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Skew Polynomial

AbstractWe provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a skew polynomial ring of derivation type to be semiprimitive when the base ring has no nonzero nil ideals. This extends existing results on the Jacobson radical of skew polynomial rings of derivation type.

scholarly journals Unique factorization in polynomial rings with zero divisors

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150113 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Anderson ◽  
Ranthony A. C. Edmonds
Keyword(s):  
Commutative Ring ◽  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Commutative Rings ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Unique Factorization ◽  
Factorization Property ◽  
Zero Divisors ◽  
Unique Factorization Domain

Given a certain factorization property of a ring [Formula: see text], we can ask if this property extends to the polynomial ring over [Formula: see text] or vice versa. For example, it is well known that [Formula: see text] is a unique factorization domain if and only if [Formula: see text] is a unique factorization domain. If [Formula: see text] is not a domain, this is no longer true. In this paper, we survey unique factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors, and characterize when a polynomial ring over an arbitrary commutative ring has unique factorization.

Polynomial rings over NLI rings need not be NLI

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weixing Chen
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Open Question

It is proved that there exists an NI ring R over which the polynomial ring R[x] is not an NLI ring. This answers an open question of Qu and Wei (Stud. Sci. Math. Hung., 51(2), 2014) in the negative. Moreover a sufficient condition of R[x] to be an NLI ring is included for an NLI ring R.

scholarly journals Stanley depth and size of a monomial ideal

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 493-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Herzog ◽  
Dorin Popescu ◽  
Marius Vladoiu
Keyword(s):  
Monomial Ideal ◽  
Stanley Depth
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document