EngGeo1 Experience of Borehole Seismic Surveys by Method of Reversed Vertical Seismic Profiling

Author(s):  
N.A. Ragozin ◽  
I.G. Mindel ◽  
B.A. Trifonov
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Kumar ◽  
Pierre Bettinelli

Abstract During the evolution of the petroleum industry, surface seismic imaging has played a critical role in reservoir characterization. In the early days, borehole seismic (BHS) was developed to complement surface seismic. However, in the last few decades, a wide range of BHS surveys has been introduced to cater to new and unique objectives over the oilfield lifecycle. In the exploration phase, vertical seismic profiling (VSP) provides critical time-depth information to bridge time indexed subsurface images to log/reservoir properties in depth. This information can be obtained using several methods like conventional wireline checkshot or zero-offset vertical seismic profiling (ZVSP), seismic while drilling (SWD) or distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) techniques. SWD is a relatively new technique to record real-time data using tool deployed in the bottomhole assembly without disturbing the drilling. It helps to improve decision making for safer drilling especially in new areas in a cost-effective manner. Recently, a breakthrough technology, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), has been introduced, where data are recorded using a fiber-optic cable with lots of saving. ZVSP also provides several parameters like, attenuation coefficient (Q), multiples prediction, impedance, reflectivity etc., which helps with characterizing the subsurface and seismic reprocessing. In the appraisal phase, BHS applications vary from velocity model update, anisotropy estimation, well- tie to imaging VSPs. The three-component VSP data is best suited for imaging and amplitude variation with offset (AVO) due to several factors like less noise interference due to quiet downhole environment, higher frequency bandwidth, proximity to the reflector, etc. Different type of VSP surveys (offset, walkaway, walkaround etc.) were designed to fulfill objectives like imaging, AVO, Q, anisotropy, and fracture mapping. In the development phase, high-resolution images (3D VSP, walkaway, or crosswell) from BHS surveys can assist with optimizing the drilling of new wells and, hence reduce costs. it can help with landing point selection, horizontal section placement, and refining interpretation for reserve calculation. BHS offers a wide range of surveys to assist the oilfield lifecycle during the production phase. Microseismic monitoring is an industry-known service to optimize hydraulic fracturing and is the only technique that captures the induced seismicity generated by hydraulic fracturing and estimate the fracture geometry (height, width, and azimuth) and in real time. During enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects, BHS can be useful to optimize the hydrocarbon drainage strategies by mapping the fluid movement (CO2, water, steam) using time-lapse surveys like walkaway, 3D VSP and/or crosswell. DAS has brought a new dimension to provide vital information on injection or production evaluation, leak detection, flow behind tubing, crossflow diagnosis, and cement evaluation during production phase. This paper highlights the usage of BHS over the lifecycle of the oilfield.


Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. WC203-WC212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garnet Wood ◽  
Clare O’Dowd ◽  
Calin Cosma ◽  
Nicoleta Enescu

The Millennium uranium deposit is located within the Athabasca Basin, in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. The deposit is hosted within moderately dipping Paleoproterozoic gneisses that are unconformably overlain by more than 500 m of flat lying, porous Paleoproterozoic to late Mesoproterozoic Athabasca Group sandstones. The deposit is associated with the sandstone-basement unconformity, post-Athabasca structure, and hydrothermal alteration. These features combine to create a complex 3D hydrogeologic setting that presents challenges with respect to mine development, production, and safety. In 2007, as part of a prefeasibility study for potential mine development, a seismic program consisting of a 3D surface survey, vertical seismic profiling, moving source profiling, and side-scan surveys was undertaken to map the complex geology. The geometry and resolution of these different seismic surveys allowed for direct imaging of the geologic targets of interest, regardless of orientation and size. After integration with drill-defined geology, the program successfully imaged the location and character of the unconformity, the post-Athabasca structural setting at camp and deposit scales, and the alteration around the deposit. This information increased the understanding of geotechnical aspects of the geology hosting the deposit, and is currently being used to help minimize risk and costs associated with mine development. Seismic surveys are now viewed as an integral part of risk reduction associated with mining in the Athabasca Basin.


Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1193-1198
Author(s):  
G. J. Elbring ◽  
H. C. Hardee ◽  
B. N. P. Paulsson

With the growing interest in borehole seismic investigations such as vertical seismic profiling and crosshole surveys, the need for new instrumentation has arisen, especially in the area of seismic sources. An ideal seismic downhole source should be nondestructive to the well, provide enough energy to be recorded at useful distances, produce a broad band of seismic frequencies, and create a reproducible signal. A prototype of a source that fits these requirements has been constructed and was described in a previous paper (Hardee et al., 1987).


Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Majer ◽  
T. V. McEvilly ◽  
F. S. Eastwood ◽  
L. R. Myer

In a pilot vertical seismic profiling study, P-wave and cross‐polarized S-wave vibrators were used to investigate the potential utility of shear‐wave anisotropy measurements in characterizing a fractured rock mass. The caprock at The Geysers geothermal field was found to exhibit about an 11 percent velocity variation between SH-waves and SV-waves generated by rotating the S-wave vibrator orientation to two orthogonal polarizations for each survey level in the well. The effect is generally consistent with the equivalent anisotropy expected from the known fracture geometry.


Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1365-1368
Author(s):  
M. Boulfoul ◽  
Doyle R. Watts

The petroleum exploration industry uses S‐wave vertical seismic profiling (VSP) to determine S‐wave velocities from downgoing direct arrivals, and S‐wave reflectivities from upgoing waves. Seismic models for quantitative calibration of amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data require S‐wave velocity profiles (Castagna et al., 1993). Vertical summations (Hardage, 1983) of the upgoing waves produce S‐wave composite traces and enable interpretation of S‐wave seismic profile sections. In the simplest application of amplitude anomalies, the coincidence of high amplitude P‐wave reflectivity and low amplitude S‐wave reflectivity is potentially a direct indicator of the presence of natural gas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document