Inconsistency of time-symmetry model

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 470-471
Author(s):  
Amrit S. Šorli ◽  
Štefan Čelan
Keyword(s):  
Invariant Space ◽  
Time Symmetry ◽  
Symmetry Model ◽  
Physical Attributes ◽  
Physical Objects ◽  
Time Invariant

Can physical objects be in time-symmetry? Physical objects can only exist in a medium that has physical attributes, which means this medium is a type of energy. Is time energy? This article will show that time is not energy, and there is no possibility that physical objects could be in time-symmetry. Physical objects can only be in symmetry in the time-invariant space, in which they exist. In this perspective, time measured with clocks is the result of the observer’s measurement in the time-invariant space. The time-symmetry model is flawed.

scholarly journals Inconsistency of Time-symmetry Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srečko Šorli ◽  
Štefan Čelan
Keyword(s):  
Invariant Space ◽  
Time Symmetry ◽  
Symmetry Model ◽  
Physical Attributes ◽  
Physical Objects ◽  
Time Invariant

Can physical objects be in time-symmetry? Physical objects can only exist in a medium that has physical attributes, which means this medium is a type of energy. Is time energy? This article will show that time is not energy and there is no possibility that physical objects could be in time-symmetry. Physical objects only can be in symmetry in the time-invariant space in which they exist. In this perspective time measured with clocks is the result of the observer’s measurement in the time-invariant space. The time-symmetry model is flawed.

A reactance theorem

1977 ◽  
Vol 353 (1672) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Energy ◽  
Electric Energy ◽  
Electromagnetic System ◽  
Energy Radiation ◽  
Physical Attributes ◽  
Time Average ◽  
Time Invariant ◽  
System Time

A formula is derived for the frequency derivative of the input reactance of any linear, passive, time-invariant electromagnetic system. It consists of five terms, each of which is identifiable uniquely with one of the following five physical attributes of the system: time-average stored magnetic energy, time-average stored electric energy, radiation, dispersion by the medium, and dissipation by the medium.

scholarly journals Bijective model of time and J.T. Fraser’s Nowless Universe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit S. Sorli
Keyword(s):  
Physical Reality ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Invariant Space ◽  
Bijective Function ◽  
Time Invariant ◽  
System Entropy

In bijective modelling, the physical reality is represented by the set X, the model of physical reality by the set Y. Every element in the set X has exactly one correspondent element in the set Y. Set X and set X are related by the bijective function f:X→Y. Bijective modelling is confirming that time is the duration of given system entropy increasing in time-invariant space. Time-invariant space is the fundamental arena of the Nowless Universe.

scholarly journals From the space-time model to the time-invariant space model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit S. Sorli
Keyword(s):  
Space Time ◽  
Invariant Space ◽  
Sequential Order ◽  
Time Model ◽  
Space Model ◽  
Universal Space ◽  
Time Invariant ◽  
Space Time Model ◽  
The Brain ◽  
The Universe

Carlo Rovelli’s research on time suggests that time has no physical existence, that it is an illusion. Bijective research confirms Rovelli is right. Time is what we measure with clocks. We measure with clocks the numerical sequential order of material change, i.e. the motion running in time-invariant space. Time as the duration of change enters existence only when measured by the observer. The change runs only in time-invariant universal space. Humans are experiencing a run of changes in time-invariant space in the frame of the linear psychological time “past-present-future” that has its basis in the neurological activity of the brain. In the universe, there is neither a physical past nor physical future. There exists only what we can observe with our senses and measure with apparatuses.

Unclean Truth

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Talbot
Keyword(s):  
Human Remains ◽  
Liminal Space ◽  
Pedagogical Tool ◽  
Victorian Era ◽  
Museum Exhibits ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Object Biography ◽  
Physical Form ◽  
English Society ◽  
Physical Objects

The Metropolitan Police’s Crime Museum, famously known as the Black Museum, exhibits evidence from some of the most appalling crimes committed within English society from the late-Victorian era into modernity. Public admittance to this museum is strictly prohibited, preventing all but police staff from viewing the macabre exhibitions held within. The physical objects on display may vary, but whether the viewer is confronted with household items, weaponry or human remains, the evidence before them is undeniably associated with the immorality surrounding the performance of a socially bad death, of murder. These items have an object biography, they are both contextualized and contextualize the environment in which they reside. But one must question the purpose of such a museum, does it merely act as a Chamber of Horrors evoking the anomie of English society in physical form, or do these exhibits have an educational intent, restricted to their liminal space inside New Scotland Yard, to be used as a pedagogical tool in the development of new methods of murder investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document