scholarly journals Induction of MHC Class I Presentation of Exogenous Antigen by Dendritic Cells Is Controlled by CD4+ T Cells Engaging Class II Molecules in Cholesterol-Rich Domains

2002 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 1172-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Machy ◽  
Karine Serre ◽  
Marjorie Baillet ◽  
Lee Leserman
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Exogenous Antigen

scholarly journals Mechanisms of mouse spleen dendritic cell function in the generation of influenza-specific, cytolytic T lymphocytes.

1992 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Nonacs ◽  
C Humborg ◽  
J P Tam ◽  
R M Steinman
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Class I

We have evaluated the capacity of dendritic cells to function as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for influenza and have examined their mechanism of action. Virus-pulsed dendritic cells were 100 times more efficient than bulk spleen cells in stimulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) formation. The induction of CTLs required neither exogenous lymphokines nor APCs in the responding T cell population. Infectious virus entered dendritic cells through intracellular acidic vacuoles and directed the synthesis of several viral proteins. If ultraviolet (UV)-inactivated or bromelain-treated viruses were used, viral protein synthesis could not be detected, and there was poor induction of CTLs. This indicated that dendritic cells were not capable of processing noninfectious virus onto major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. However, UV-inactivated and bromelain-treated viruses were presented efficiently to class II-restricted CD4+ T cells. The CD4+ T cells crossreacted with different strains of influenza and markedly amplified CTL formation. Cell lines that lacked MHC class II, and consequently the capacity to stimulate CD4+ T cells, failed to induce CTLs unless helper lymphokines were added. Similarly, dendritic cells pulsed with the MHC class I-restricted nucleoprotein 147-155 peptide were poor stimulators in the absence of exogenous helper factors. We conclude that the function of dendritic cells as APCs for the generation of virus-specific CTLs in vitro depends measurably upon: (a) charging class I molecules with peptides derived from endogenously synthesized viral antigens, and (b) stimulating a strong CD4+ helper T cell response.

scholarly journals Retrovirally Transduced Human Dendritic Cells Can Generate T Cells Recognizing Multiple MHC Class I and Class II Epitopes from the Melanoma Antigen Glycoprotein 100

2001 ◽  
Vol 167 (8) ◽  
pp. 4758-4764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Réjean Lapointe ◽  
Richard E. Royal ◽  
Mark E. Reeves ◽  
Ivy Altomare ◽  
Paul F. Robbins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Melanoma Antigen ◽  
Human Dendritic Cells ◽  
Glycoprotein 100

Human cytomegalovirus inhibits maturation and impairs function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
pp. 2913-2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Moutaftsi ◽  
Anja M. Mehl ◽  
Leszek K. Borysiewicz ◽  
Zsuzsanna Tabi
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Hcmv Infection ◽  
Cytokine Production ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Dc Function

Abstract Dendritic cells (DCs) play a pivotal role in the generation of virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses, but some viruses can render DCs inefficient in stimulating T cells. We studied whether infection of DCs with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) results in a suppression of DC function which may assist HCMV in establishing persistence. The effect of HCMV infection on the phenotype and function of monocyte-derived DCs and on their ability to mature following infection with an endothelial cell–adapted clinical HCMV isolate were studied. HCMV infection induced no maturation of DCs; instead, it efficiently down-regulated the expression of surface major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, CD40, and CD80 molecules. Slight down-regulation of MHC class II and CD86 molecules was also observed. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)–induced maturation of infected DCs was strongly inhibited, as indicated by lower levels of surface expression of MHC class I, class II, costimulatory, and CD83 molecules. The down-regulation or inhibition of these surface markers occurred only in HCMV antigen-positive DCs. DCs produced no interleukin 12 (IL-12) and only low levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) upon HCMV infection. Furthermore, cytokine production upon stimulation with LPS or CD40L was significantly impaired. Inhibition of cytokine production did not depend on viral gene expression as UV-irradiated HCMV resulted in the same effect. Proliferation and cytotoxicity of T cells specific to a recall antigen presented by DCs were also reduced when DCs were HCMV infected. This study shows that HCMV inhibits DC function, revealing a powerful viral strategy to delay or prevent the generation of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells.

MHC Sınıf I ve MHC Sınıf II Gen Düzenlenmesi

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-156
Author(s):  
Şule KARATAŞ ◽  
Fatma SAVRAN OĞUZ
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Mhc Molecules ◽  
Class Ii Mhc ◽  
Regulation Mechanisms

Introduction: Peptides obtained by processing intracellular and extracellular antigens are presented to T cells to stimulate the immune response. This presentation is made by peptide receptors called major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The regulation mechanisms of MHC molecules, which have similar roles in the immune response, especially at the gene level, have significant differences according to their class. Objective: Class I and class II MHC molecules encoded by MHC genes on the short arm of the sixth chromosome are peptide receptors that stimulate T cell response. These peptides, which will enable the recognition of the antigen from which they originate, are loaded into MHC molecules and presented to T cells. Although the principles of loading and delivering peptides are similar for both molecules, the peptide sources and peptide loading mechanisms are different. In addition, class I molecules are expressed in all nucleated cells while class II molecules are expressed only in Antigen Presentation Cells (APC). These differences; It shows that MHC class I is not expressed by exactly the same transcriptional mechanisms as MHC class II. In our article, we aimed to compare the gene expressions of both classes and reveal their similarities and differences. Discussion and Conclusion: A better understanding of the transcriptional mechanisms of MHC molecules will reveal the role of these molecules in diseases more clearly. In our review, we discussed MHC gene regulation mechanisms with presence of existing informations, which is specific to the MHC class, for contribute to future research. Keywords: MHC class I, MHC class II, MHC gene regulation, promoter, SXY module, transcription

scholarly journals Peptide vaccination directed against IDO1-expressing immune cells elicits CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity and enhanced anti-PD1 responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000605
Author(s):  
Souvik Dey ◽  
Erika Sutanto-Ward ◽  
Katharina L Kopp ◽  
James DuHadaway ◽  
Arpita Mondal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Mhc Class I ◽  
Adoptive Transfer ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Class I ◽  
Antitumor Effects

BackgroundThe tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), which subverts T-cell immunity at multiple levels, is itself subject to inherent T-cell reactivity. This intriguing deviation from central tolerance has been interpreted as counterbalancing IDO1-mediated immunosuppression. Based on this hypothesis, clinical studies employing an IDO1 peptide-based vaccine approach for cancer treatment have been initiated, but there remains a pressing need to further investigate the immunological ramifications of stimulating the anti-IDO1 T-cell response in this manner.MethodsCT26 colon carcinoma tumors were evaluated for expression of IDO1 protein by western blot analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Mouse IDO1-derived peptides, predicted to bind either major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or II of the H2d BALB/c strain, were emulsified in 50% Montanide for prophylactic or therapeutic vaccine treatment of CT26 tumor-bearing mice initiated either 7 days prior to or following tumor cell injection, respectively. In some therapeutic treatment experiments, administration of programmed cell death protein 1-binding antibody (anti-PD1 antibody) or epacadostat was concurrently initiated. Tumor size was determined by caliper measurements and comparative tumor growth suppression was assessed by longitudinal analyses of tumor growth data. For adoptive transfer, T cells from complete responder animals were isolated using paramagnetic beads and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.ResultsThis study identifies mouse MHC class I-directed and II-directed, IDO1-derived peptides capable of eliciting antitumor responses, despite finding IDO1 expressed exclusively in tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Treatment of established tumors with anti-PD1 antibody and class I-directed but not class II-directed IDO1 peptide vaccines produced an enhanced antitumor response. Likewise, class I-directed and II-directed IDO1 peptides elicited an enhanced combinatorial response, suggesting distinct mechanisms of action. Consistent with this interpretation, adoptive transfer of isolated CD8+ T cells from class I and CD4+ T cells from class II peptide-vaccinated responder mice delayed tumor growth. The class II-directed response was completely IDO1-dependent while the class I-directed response included an IDO1-independent component consistent with antigen spread.ConclusionsThe in vivo antitumor effects demonstrated with IDO1-based vaccines via targeting of the tumor microenvironment highlight the utility of mouse models for further exploration and refinement of this novel vaccine-based approach to IDO1-directed cancer therapy and its potential to improve patient response rates to anti-PD1 therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document