Numerical Investigation of the Potential of Late Intake Valve Closing (LIVC) Coupled with Double Diesel Direct-Injection Strategy for Meeting High Fuel Efficiency with Ultra-Low Emissions in a Heavy-Duty Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Engine at High Load

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangfu Xu ◽  
Ming Jia ◽  
Zhen Xu ◽  
Yachao Chang ◽  
Tianyou Wang
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Investigation ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Fuel Efficiency ◽  
High Load ◽  
Compression Ignition ◽  
Intake Valve ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition ◽  
Injection Strategy ◽  
High Fuel Efficiency

Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Using Premixed Hydrated Ethanol and Direct Injection Diesel

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam B. Dempsey ◽  
Bishwadipa Das Adhikary ◽  
Sandeep Viswanathan ◽  
Rolf D. Reitz
Keyword(s):  
Direct Injection ◽  
Fuel Efficiency ◽  
High Reactivity ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Compression Ignition ◽  
Load Range ◽  
Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition ◽  
Hcci Combustion ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel Engine ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

The present study uses numerical simulations to explore the use of hydrated (wet) ethanol for reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) operation in a heavy duty diesel engine. RCCI uses in-cylinder blending of a low reactivity fuel with a high reactivity fuel and has demonstrated significant fuel efficiency and emissions benefits using a variety of fuels, including gasoline and diesel. Combustion timing is controlled by the local blended fuel reactivity (i.e., octane number), and the combustion duration can be controlled by establishing optimized gradients in fuel reactivity in the combustion chamber. In the present study, the low reactivity fuel was hydrated ethanol while the higher reactivity fuel was diesel. First, the effect of water on ethanol/water/diesel mixtures in completely premixed HCCI combustion was investigated using GT-Power and single-zone CHEMKIN simulations. The results showed that the main impact of the water in the ethanol is to reduce the initial in-cylinder temperature due to vaporization cooling. Next, multi-dimensional engine modeling was performed using the KIVA code at engine loads from 5 to 17 bars IMEP at 1300 rev/min with various grades of hydrated ethanol and a fixed diesel fraction of the total fuel. The results show that hydrated ethanol can be used in RCCI combustion with gross indicated thermal efficiencies up to 55% and very low emissions. A 70/30 ethanol/water mixture (by mass) was found to yield the best results across the entire load range without the need for EGR.

Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Using Premixed Hydrated Ethanol and Direct Injection Diesel

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Dempsey ◽  
B. Das Adhikary ◽  
S. Viswanathan ◽  
R. D. Reitz
Keyword(s):  
Direct Injection ◽  
Fuel Efficiency ◽  
High Reactivity ◽  
Net Energy ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Compression Ignition ◽  
Load Range ◽  
Pure Ethanol ◽  
Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition ◽  
Heavy Duty Diesel

Previous research has shown that a Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engine with efficient heat recovery can operate on a 35 to 65% volumetric mixture of ethanol-in-water while achieving high brake thermal efficiency (∼39%) and very low NOx emissions [4]. The major advantage of utilizing hydrated ethanol as a fuel is that the net energy gain improves from 21 to 55% of the heating value of ethanol and its co-products, since significant energy must be expended to remove water during production. This is required because wet ethanol is not suitable for conventional combustion engines. For example, spark ignition engines demand the use of pure ethanol because the dilution caused by water reduces the flame speed, resulting in misfire and problems due to condensation. The present study uses numerical simulations to explore the use of wet ethanol for Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) operation in a heavy duty diesel engine. RCCI uses in-cylinder blending of a low reactivity fuel with a high reactivity fuel and has demonstrated significant fuel efficiency and emissions benefits using a variety of fuels, including gasoline and diesel. Combustion timing is controlled by the local blended fuel reactivity (i.e. octane number), and the combustion duration can be controlled by establishing optimized gradients in fuel reactivity in the combustion chamber. In the present study, the low reactivity fuel was hydrated ethanol while the higher reactivity fuel was diesel. First, the effect of water on ethanol/water/diesel HCCI was investigated using GT-Power and single-zone CHEMKIN simulations. The results showed that the main impact of the water in the ethanol is to reduce the IVC temperature due to vaporization cooling. Next, multidimensional engine modeling was performed using the KIVA code at engine loads from 5 to 17 bar IMEP at 1300 rev/min with various grades of hydrated ethanol and a fixed diesel fraction of the total fuel. The results show that hydrated ethanol can be used in a RCCI engine with gross indicated thermal efficiencies up to 55% and very low emissions. A 70/30 ethanol/water mixture (by mass) was found to yield the best results across the entire load range without the need for EGR.

scholarly journals Influence of the diesel pilot injector configuration on ethanol combustion and performance of a heavy-duty direct injection engine

2021 ◽  
pp. 146808742110012
Author(s):  
Nicola Giramondi ◽  
Anders Jäger ◽  
Daniel Norling ◽  
Anders Christiansen Erlandsson
Keyword(s):  
Direct Injection ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
High Load ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Injection Timing ◽  
Diesel Combustion ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Pure Ethanol ◽  
Ethanol Combustion

Thanks to its properties and production pathways, ethanol represents a valuable alternative to fossil fuels, with potential benefits in terms of CO2, NOx, and soot emission reduction. The resistance to autoignition of ethanol necessitates an ignition trigger in compression-ignition engines for heavy-duty applications, which in the current study is a diesel pilot injection. The simultaneous direct injection of pure ethanol as main fuel and diesel as pilot fuel through separate injectors is experimentally investigated in a heavy-duty single cylinder engine at a low and a high load point. The influence of the nozzle hole number and size of the diesel pilot injector on ethanol combustion and engine performance is evaluated based on an injection timing sweep using three diesel injector configurations. The tested configurations have the same geometric total nozzle area for one, two and four diesel sprays. The relative amount of ethanol injected is swept between 78 – 89% and 91 – 98% on an energy basis at low and high load, respectively. The results show that mixing-controlled combustion of ethanol is achieved with all tested diesel injector configurations and that the maximum combustion efficiency and variability levels are in line with conventional diesel combustion. The one-spray diesel injector is the most robust trigger for ethanol ignition, as it allows to limit combustion variability and to achieve higher combustion efficiencies compared to the other diesel injector configurations. However, the two- and four-spray diesel injectors lead to higher indicated efficiency levels. The observed difference in the ethanol ignition dynamics is evaluated and compared to conventional diesel combustion. The study broadens the knowledge on ethanol mixing-controlled combustion in heavy-duty engines at various operating conditions, providing the insight necessary for the optimization of the ethanol-diesel dual-injection system.

An integrated effort of medium reactivity fuel, in-cylinder, and after-treatment strategies to demonstrate potential reduction in challenging emissions of reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion

2019 ◽  
Vol 234 (5) ◽  
pp. 1260-1278
Author(s):  
R Murugan ◽  
D Ganesh ◽  
G Nagarajan
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Cetane Number ◽  
Combustion Process ◽  
Oxidation Catalyst ◽  
Compression Ignition ◽  
Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition ◽  
Potential Reduction ◽  
Carbon Monoxide Emission ◽  
Compression Ignition Combustion

Previous studies on reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion indicated that, reducing the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions at low load conditions still remains a challenge because of lower in-cylinder temperatures due to lower global reactivity gradient and reduced oxidation process. Research in this direction has not been reported so far and with this motivation, an attempt has been made to increase the global reactivity gradient and oxidation of fuel–air mixture by converting the low reactivity fuel methanol into medium reactivity fuel. This is achieved by mixing high octane oxygenated fuel, methanol (Octane Number: 110), with an oxygenated better cetane and volatility fuels like polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (Cetane Number: 78) and isobutanol (Cetane Number: 15). The medium reactivity fuel with multiple direct injection of diesel fuel timed the combustion of dual fuel–air mixture to avoid too late or too advanced combustion which are the prime factors in controlling the unburnt emissions in a low temperature combustion process. Four medium reactivity fuel samples, M80IB20, M60IB40, M90P10, and M80P20, on percentage volume basis have been prepared and tested on the modified on-road three-cylinder turbocharged common rail direct injection diesel engine to demonstrate higher indicated thermal efficiency and potential reduction in unburnt and oxides of nitrogen/particulate matter emissions from reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion. Experimental results show that, use of medium reactivity fuel with optimized diesel injection strategy resulted in 66% decrease in hydrocarbon emission and 74% decrease in carbon monoxide emission by enhancing the oxidation of fuel–air mixture at lower temperatures which is evidently noticed in the combustion characteristics. Further reduction in hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emission of about 90% has been achieved by integrating the diesel oxidation catalyst with the engine.

Computational optimization of reactivity controlled compression ignition combustion to achieve high efficiency and clean combustion

2020 ◽  
pp. 146808742093173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avilash Jain ◽  
Anand Krishnasamy ◽  
Pradeep V
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Artificial Neural Network ◽  
Fuel Injection ◽  
Direct Injection ◽  
Network Models ◽  
Compression Ignition ◽  
Neural Network Models ◽  
Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition ◽  
Artificial Neural ◽  
Artificial Neural Network Models

One of the major limitations of reactivity controlled compression ignition is higher unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions and lower thermal efficiency at part load operating conditions. In the present study, a combined numerical approach using a commercial three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics code CONVERGE along with artificial neural network and genetic algorithm is presented to address the above limitation. A production light-duty diesel engine is modified to run in reactivity controlled compression ignition by replacing an existing mechanical fuel injection system with a flexible electronic port fuel injection and common rail direct injection systems. The injection schedules of port fuel injection and direct injection injectors are controlled using National Instruments port and direct injection driver modules. Upon validation of combustion and emission parameters, parametric investigations are carried out to establish the effects of direct-injected diesel fuel timing start of injection (SOI), premixed fuel ratio and intake charge temperature on the engine performance and emissions in reactivity controlled compression ignition. The results obtained show that the start of injection timing and intake charge temperature significantly influence combustion phasing, while the premixed fuel ratio controls mixture reactivity and combustion quality. By utilizing the data generated with the validated computational fluid dynamics models, the artificial neural network models are trained to predict the engine exhaust emissions and efficiency. The artificial neural network models for gross indicated efficiency and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) are then coupled with genetic algorithm to maximize gross indicated efficiency while keeping the NOx and soot emissions within Euro VI emission limits. By optimizing the start of injection timing, premixed fuel ratio and intake charge temperature simultaneously using the artificial neural network models coupled with genetic algorithm, 19% improvement in gross indicated efficiency, 60% and 64% reduction in hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions, respectively, are obtained in reactivity controlled compression ignition compared to the baseline case.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document