scholarly journals The Study of Process Display Intervals during the Computer Response

1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 476-477
Author(s):  
T. Okamura ◽  
M. Karashima ◽  
A. Komatsubara ◽  
M. Saito
Keyword(s):  
Computer Response

Computer response time measurements of mood, fatigue and symptom scale items: Implications for scale response time uses

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Ryman ◽  
Paul Naitoh ◽  
Carl Englund ◽  
S.G. Genser
Keyword(s):  
Response Time ◽  
Symptom Scale ◽  
Scale Response ◽  
Computer Response

The Optimization of Damping of Four Configurations of a Vibrating Uniform Beam

1963 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Henney ◽  
J. P. Raney
Keyword(s):  
Digital Computer ◽  
Empirical Formula ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Maximum Displacement ◽  
Single Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Displacement Response ◽  
Single Degree ◽  
Uniform Beam ◽  
Computer Response ◽  
Analytical Expressions

Approximate analytical expressions for optimum damping for four configurations of forcing and damping a uniform beam were evaluated and the displacement responses for optimum damping values obtained from these expressions were calculated by a digital computer. It was found that the responses were accurately optimized. The sensitivity of maximum displacement response to deviation from optimum damping was investigated, but no analytical expressions relating change to deviation were obtained. An empirical formula, based upon consideration of the response of the beam as a single-degree-of-freedom system, was shown to be a good approximation of results obtained from the computer response curves. The four configurations investigated were relatively insensitive to changes in damping from optimum.

Books and Computer Response Activities That Support Literacy Development

2005 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda D. Labbo
Keyword(s):  
Literacy Development ◽  
Computer Response

The Effects of Potentiometer Dimensionality, System Response Time, and Time of Day on Interactive Graphical Problem Solving

1982 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Goodman ◽  
Robert Spence
Keyword(s):  
Response Time ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Time Variability ◽  
System Response ◽  
System Response Time ◽  
Computer Response ◽  
Two Parameters ◽  
Two Parameter

Subjects solved a two-parameter optimization problem using a graphic display with light-pen interaction via either two linear light potentiometers or one planar light potentiometer. Normally distributed computer response times were used, with a mean of 1.0 s and a range of 0.2 to 3.4 s. Three standard deviation values were used: 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 s. Potentiometer dimensionality affected the extent to which each of the two parameters was searched, but had no significant effect on solution time. System response time variability affected the time taken to solve the problem, and its effect interacted strongly with time of day.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document