Validation of MODIS 3 km Land Aerosol Optical Depth from NASA's EOS Terra and Aqua Missions
Abstract. The two MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors, aboard Earth Observing Satellites (EOS) Terra and Aqua, have been making aerosol observations for more than 15 years. From these observations, the MODIS dark target (DT) aerosol retrieval algorithm provides aerosol optical depth (AOD) products, globally over both land and ocean. In addition to the standard resolution product (10 × 10 km2), the MODIS collection 6 (C006) data release included a higher resolution (3 × 3 km2). Other than accommodations for the two different resolutions, the 10 km, and 3 km DT algorithms are basically the same. In this study, we perform global validation of the higher resolution AOD over global land by comparing against AERONET measurements. The MODIS-AERONET collocated data sets consist of 161,410 high-confidence AOD pairs from 2000 to 2015 for MODIS Terra and 2003 to 2015 for MODIS-Aqua. We find that 62.5 % and 68.4 % of AODs retrieved from MODIS-Terra and MODIS-Aqua, respectively, fall within previously published expected error bounds of ±(0.05 + 0.2*AOD), with a high correlation (R = 0.87). The scatter is not random but exhibits a mean positive bias of ~ 0.06 for Terra and ~ 0.03 for Aqua. These biases for the 3 km product are approximately 0.03 larger than the biases found in similar validations of the 10 km product. The validation results for the 3 km product did not have a relationship to aerosol loading (i.e. true AOD) but did exhibit dependence on quality flags, region, viewing geometry, and aerosol spatial variability. Time series of global MODIS-AERONET differences show that validation is not static, but has changed over the course of both sensors' lifetimes, with MODIS-Terra showing more change over time. The likely cause of the change of validation over time is sensor degradation, but changes in the distribution of AERONET stations and differences in the global aerosol system itself could be contributing to the temporal variability of validation.