scholarly journals Atmospheric drag effects on modelled low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites during the July 2000 Bastille Day event in contrast to an interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-412
Author(s):  
Victor U. J. Nwankwo ◽  
William Denig ◽  
Sandip K. Chakrabarti ◽  
Muyiwa P. Ajakaiye ◽  
Johnson Fatokun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Activity ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Percentage Increase ◽  
Atmospheric Drag ◽  
Drag Effect ◽  
Satellite Drag ◽  
Ballistic Coefficient ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. In this work, we simulated the atmospheric drag effect on two model SmallSats (small satellites) in low Earth orbit (LEO) with different ballistic coefficients during 1-month intervals of solar–geomagnetic quiet and perturbed conditions. The goal of this effort was to quantify how solar–geomagnetic activity influences atmospheric drag and perturbs satellite orbits, with particular emphasis on the Bastille Day event. Atmospheric drag compromises satellite operations due to increased ephemeris errors, attitude positional uncertainties and premature satellite re-entry. During a 1-month interval of generally quiescent solar–geomagnetic activity (July 2006), the decay in altitude (h) was a modest 0.53 km (0.66 km) for the satellite with the smaller (larger) ballistic coefficient of 2.2×10-3 m2 kg−1 (3.03×10-3 m2 kg−1). The associated orbital decay rates (ODRs) during this quiet interval ranged from 13 to 23 m per day (from 16 to 29 m per day). For the disturbed interval of July 2000 the significantly increased altitude loss and range of ODRs were 2.77 km (3.09 km) and 65 to 120 m per day (78 to 142 m per day), respectively. Within the two periods, more detailed analyses over 12 d intervals of extremely quiet and disturbed conditions revealed respective orbital decays of 0.16 km (0.20 km) and 1.14 km (1.27 km) for the satellite with the smaller (larger) ballistic coefficient. In essence, the model results show that there was a 6- to 7-fold increase in the deleterious impacts of satellite drag between the quiet and disturbed periods. We also estimated the enhanced atmospheric drag effect on the satellites' parameters caused by the July 2000 Bastille Day event (in contrast to the interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions). The additional percentage increase, due to the Bastille Day event, to the monthly mean values of h and ODR are 34.69 % and 50.13 % for Sat-A and 36.45 % and 68.95 % for Sat-B. These simulations confirmed (i) the dependence of atmospheric drag force on a satellite's ballistic coefficient, and (ii) that increased solar–geomagnetic activity substantially raises the degrading effect of satellite drag. In addition, the results indicate that the impact of short-duration geomagnetic transients (such as the Bastille Day storm) can have a further deleterious effect on normal satellite operations. Thus, this work increases the visibility and contributes to the scientific knowledge surrounding the Bastille Day event and also motivates the introduction of new indices used to describe and estimate the atmospheric drag effect when comparing regimes of varying solar–geomagnetic activity. We suggest that a model of satellite drag, when combined with a high-fidelity atmospheric specification as was done here, can lead to improved satellite ephemeris estimates.

scholarly journals Atmospheric drag effects on modelled LEO satellites during the July 2000 Bastille Day event in contrast to an interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor U. J. Nwankwo ◽  
William Denig ◽  
Sandip K. Chakrabarti ◽  
Muyiwa P. Ajakaiye ◽  
Johnson Fatokun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Activity ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Decay Rates ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Percentage Increase ◽  
Atmospheric Drag ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Satellite Drag ◽  
Ballistic Coefficient ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. In this work we simulated the effects of atmospheric drag on two model SmallSats in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) with different ballistic coefficients during 1-month intervals of solar-geomagnetic quiet and perturbed conditions. The goal of this effort was to quantify how solar-geomagnetic activity influences atmospheric drag and perturbs satellite orbits. Atmospheric drag compromises satellite operations due to increased ephemeris errors, attitude positional uncertainties and premature satellite re-entry. During a 1-month interval of generally quiescent solar-geomagnetic activity (July 2006) the decay in altitude (h) was a modest 0.53 km (0.66 km) for the satellite with the smaller (larger) ballistic coefficient of 2.2 × 10−3 m2/kg (3.03 × 10−3 m2/kg). The associated Orbital Decay Rates (ODRs) during this quiet interval ranged from 13 m/day to 23 m/day (from 16 m/day to 29 m/day). For the disturbed interval of July 2000 the significantly increased altitude loss and range of ODRs were 2.77 km (3.09 km) and 65 m/day to 120 m/day (78 m/day to 142 m/day), respectively. Within the two periods more detailed analyses over 12-day intervals of extremely quiet and disturbed conditions revealed respective orbital decays of 0.16 km (0.20 km) and 1.14 km (1.27 km) for the satellite with the smaller (larger) ballistic coefficient. In essence, the model results show that there was a 6–7 fold increase in the deleterious impacts of satellite drag between the quiet and disturbed periods. We also estimated the enhanced atmospheric drag effect on the satellites' parameters caused by the July 2000 Bastille Day event (in contrast to the interval of geomagnetically quiet conditions). The additional percentage increase due to the Bastille Day event to the monthly mean values of h and ODR are 34.69 % and 50.13 % for Sat-A, and 36.45 % and 68.95 % for Sat-B. These simulations confirmed; (i) the dependence of atmospheric drag force on a satellite's ballistic coefficient, and (ii) that increased solar-geomagnetic activity substantially raises the degrading effect of satellite drag. In addition, the results indicate that the impact of short-duration geomagnetic transients can have a further deleterious effect on normal satellite operations. While none of these findings were particularly surprising or profound we suggest that a model of satellite drag when combined with a high-fidelity atmospheric specification, as was done here, can lead to improved satellite ephemeris estimates.

scholarly journals Atmospheric Drag Alters Satellite Orbits

Eos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Shultz
Keyword(s):  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Atmospheric Drag ◽  
Modeling Study

A new modeling study shows how the density of the thermosphere influences the paths of satellites in low Earth orbit.

scholarly journals Study the Effect of Solar Radiation Pressure at Several Satellite Orbits

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1253-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baghdad Science Journal
Keyword(s):  
Solar Radiation ◽  
Radiation Pressure ◽  
Jacobian Matrix ◽  
Solar Radiation Pressure ◽  
Equation Of Motion ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Orbit Satellite ◽  
Low Earth Orbit Satellite

The effects of solar radiation pressure at several satellite (near Earth orbit satellite, low Earth orbit satellite, medium Earth orbit satellite and high Earth orbit satellite ) have been investigated. Computer simulation of the equation of motion with perturbations using step-by-step integration (Cowell's method) designed by matlab a 7.4 where using Jacobian matrix method to increase the accuracy of result.

scholarly journals Efficiency in Carrying Cargo to Earth Orbits: Spaceports Repositioning

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (20) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Jakub Hospodka ◽  
Zdeněk Houfek
Keyword(s):  
Earth Rotation ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Atmospheric Drag ◽  
Significant Cost ◽  
Space Flights ◽  
Kennedy Space Center ◽  
Kennedy Space ◽  
Earth Orbits ◽  
Launch Platform

Space flights are in these days not any more question of technology, but more question of costs. One way how to decrease cost of launch is change of home spaceport. Change of home spaceport for different rockets is a way to achieve more efficient launches to space. The reason is different acceleration achieved from Earth rotation. We added several mathematical calculations of missions to Low Earth Orbit and Geostationary Earth Orbit to show bonuses from Earth rotation and effect of atmospheric drag on specific rockets used these days. We discussed only already used space vessels. Namely Arianne 5, Delta 4 heavy, Proton-M, Zenit and Falcon9. For reaching GEO we discuss possibility of using Hohmman transfer, because none of aforementioned vessels is available for direct GEO entry. As possible place for launch we discussed spaceports Baikonur, Kennedy Space center, Guyana Space center and Sea Launch platform. We present results in form of additional acceleration for each spaceport, and we also project this additional acceleration in means payload increase. In conclusion we find important differences between vessel effectivity based on spaceport used for launch. Change of launch location may bring significant cost decrease for operators.

A Comparative Study of Satellite Orbits as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO)

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Vishwakarma ◽  
Aradhana S. Chauhan ◽  
Shoeba Aasma
Keyword(s):  
Satellite Orbit ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Geostationary Orbit ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Broadcast Television ◽  
Television Use ◽  
Gps System ◽  
Orbiting Systems

It is known facts that satellites are used to receive the signal at geostationary orbit by remaining stationary above a particular point on the Earth. The orbit that is chosen for a satellite depends upon its application. Those used for direct broadcast television use geostationary orbit. Many communication satellites similarly use geostationary orbit. Other satellite systems used for satellite phones use Low Earth orbiting systems. Similarly, satellite systems used for navigation like Nav-star or Global Positioning (GPS) system occupy a relatively Low Earth Orbit. There are also many other types of satellites : Weather satellites Research satellites and many others. Each will have its own type of orbit depending upon its application. The actual satellite orbit that is chosen will depend on factors including its function, and the area of serving. At some instances, the satellite orbit may be as low as 100 miles (160 km) for a Low Earth Orbit (LEO), whereas others may be over 22 000 miles (36000 km) high as in the case of a Geostationary Orbit (GEO). The satellite may even has an elliptical rather than a circular orbit.

scholarly journals Increasing the Accuracy of Orbital Elements for a Satellite in a Low Earth Orbit under the Influence of Atmospheric Drag Using Adams-Bashforth Method

2021 ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
Rasha H. Ibrahim ◽  
Abdul-Rahman H. Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Integration Method ◽  
Major Axis ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
True Anomaly ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Atmospheric Drag ◽  
Orbital Elements ◽  
Semi Major Axis ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Perturbed Equation

The perturbed equation of motion can be solved by using many numerical methods. Most of these solutions were inaccurate; the fourth order Adams-Bashforth method is a good numerical integration method, which was used in this research to study the variation of orbital elements under atmospheric drag influence.  A satellite in a Low Earth Orbit (LEO), with altitude form perigee = 200 km, was selected during 1300 revolutions (84.23 days) and ASat / MSat value of 5.1 m2/ 900 kg. The equations of converting state vectors into orbital elements were applied. Also, various orbital elements were evaluated and analyzed. The results showed that, for the semi-major axis, eccentricity and inclination have a secular falling discrepancy, Longitude of Ascending Node is periodic, Argument of Perigee has a secular increasing variation, while true anomaly grows linearly from 0 to 360°. Furthermore, all orbital elements, excluding Longitude of Ascending Node, Argument of Perigee, and true anomaly, were more affected by drag than other orbital elements, through their falling as the time passes. The results illustrate a high correlation as compared with literature reviews in this field.

scholarly journals Charting Satellite Courses in a Crowded Thermosphere

Eos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Bruinsma ◽  
Mariangel Fedrizzi ◽  
Jia Yue ◽  
Christian Siemes ◽  
Stijn Lemmens
Keyword(s):  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Atmospheric Drag

As the number of satellites in low Earth orbit grows by leaps and bounds, accurate calculations of the effects of atmospheric drag on their trajectories are becoming critically important.

Gynecologic Risk Mitigation Considerations for Long-Duration Spaceflight

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (7) ◽  
pp. 543-564
Author(s):  
Jon G. Steller ◽  
Rebecca S. Blue ◽  
Roshan Burns ◽  
Tina M. Bayuse ◽  
Erik L. Antonsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Space Environment ◽  
Earth Orbit ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Health Maintenance ◽  
Medical Risk ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION: As NASA and its international partners, as well as the commercial spaceflight industry, prepare for missions of increasing duration and venturing outside of low-Earth orbit, mitigation of medical risk is of high priority. Gynecologic considerations constitute one facet of medical risk for female astronauts. This manuscript will review the preflight, in-flight, and postflight clinical evaluation, management, and prevention considerations for reducing gynecologic and reproductive risks in female astronauts.METHODS: Relevant gynecological articles from databases including Ovid, Medline, Web of Science, various medical libraries, and NASA archives were evaluated for this review. In particular, articles addressing preventive measures or management of conditions in resource-limited environments were evaluated for applicability to future long-duration exploration spaceflight.RESULTS: Topics including abnormal uterine bleeding, anemia, bone mineral density, ovarian cysts, venous thromboembolism, contraception, fertility, and health maintenance were reviewed. Prevention and treatment strategies are discussed with a focus on management options that consider limitations of onboard medical capabilities.DISCUSSION: Long-duration exploration spaceflight will introduce new challenges for maintenance of gynecological and reproductive health. The impact of the space environment outside of low-Earth orbit on gynecological concerns remains unknown, with factors such as increased particle radiation exposure adding complexity and potential risk. While the most effective means of minimizing the impact of gynecologic or reproductive pathology for female astronauts is screening and prevention, gynecological concerns can arise unpredictably as they do on Earth. Careful consideration of gynecological risks and potential adverse events during spaceflight is a critical component to risk analysis and preventive medicine for future exploration missions.Steller JG, Blue RS, Burns R, Bayuse TM, Antonsen EL, Jain V, Blackwell MM, Jennings RT. Gynecologic risk mitigation considerations for long-duration spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(7):543–564.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document