CtIP-dependent nascent RNA expression flanking DNA breaks guides the choice of DNA repair pathway

The RNA world is changing our views about sensing and resolution of DNA damage. Here, we developed single-molecule DNA/RNA analysis approaches to visualize how nascent RNA facilitates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is crucial for DSB resolution in human cells. DSB-flanking, RNAPII-generated nascent RNA forms RNA:DNA hybrids, guiding the upstream DNA repair steps towards favouring the error-free Homologous Recombination (HR) pathway over Non-Homologous End Joining. Specific RNAPII inhibitor, THZ1, impairs recruitment of essential HR proteins to DSBs, implicating nascent RNA in DNA end resection, initiation and execution of HR repair. We further propose that resection factor CtIP interacts with and re-activates RNAPII when paused by the RNA:DNA hybrids, collectively promoting faithful repair of chromosome breaks to maintain genomic integrity.

DNA Double Strand Break Repair and Its Control by Nucleosome Remodeling

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired in eukaryotes by one of several cellular mechanisms. The decision-making process controlling DSB repair takes place at the step of DNA end resection, the nucleolytic processing of DNA ends, which generates single-stranded DNA overhangs. Dependent on the length of the overhang, a corresponding DSB repair mechanism is engaged. Interestingly, nucleosomes—the fundamental unit of chromatin—influence the activity of resection nucleases and nucleosome remodelers have emerged as key regulators of DSB repair. Nucleosome remodelers share a common enzymatic mechanism, but for global genome organization specific remodelers have been shown to exert distinct activities. Specifically, different remodelers have been found to slide and evict, position or edit nucleosomes. It is an open question whether the same remodelers exert the same function also in the context of DSBs. Here, we will review recent advances in our understanding of nucleosome remodelers at DSBs: to what extent nucleosome sliding, eviction, positioning and editing can be observed at DSBs and how these activities affect the DSB repair decision.

DNA End Resection: Mechanism and Control

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are cytotoxic lesions that threaten genome integrity and cell viability. Typically, cells repair DSBs by either nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The relative use of these two pathways depends on many factors, including cell cycle stage and the nature of the DNA ends. A critical determinant of repair pathway selection is the initiation of 5′→3′ nucleolytic degradation of DNA ends, a process referred to as DNA end resection. End resection is essential to create single-stranded DNA overhangs, which serve as the substrate for the Rad51 recombinase to initiate HR and are refractory to NHEJ repair. Here, we review recent insights into the mechanisms of end resection, how it is regulated, and the pathological consequences of its dysregulation.

Fanci-FANCD2 Promotes Genome Stability and DNA Repair By Down-Regulating BLM Helicase Activity

Background: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disease characterized by bone marrow failure, developmental defects, and higher risk of cancer. Mutations in FA genes have been detected commonly in a large swath of cancers. In the FA DNA repair pathway, DNA damage induces the mono-ubiquitination of the FANCI-FANCD2 (ID2) heterodimer and this regulation licenses the execution of downstream DNA damage signaling and repair steps. In response to replication stress, FANCD2 also prevents replication fork collapse during S phase. Bloom syndrome (BS) is also a genomic instability disease, characterized by growth abnormalities and cancer predisposition. The single BS protein, BLM helicase, participates in DNA repair by promoting DNA end resection and double Holliday junction dissolution. It has been shown that BLM is involved in restart of stalled replication fork. FA and BS have functional interactions. In tumor DNA sequencing of the Yale Precision Tumor board, we identified a somatic 6 amino acid deletion in FANCD2 in a head and neck tumor, while a germline point mutation was found on the other allele. We have identified a FANCD2-L822A mutant with defective BLM binding, which was used to further investigate the role of FANCD2-BLM interaction in genome stability and DNA repair. Methods: Highly purified proteins were used to investigate how ID2 affects helicase and DNA end resection activity of the BLM complex. HeLa, FANCD2-deficient, and FANCD2 corrected fibroblast cell lines were used to examine pRPA2 and RAD51 foci formation. We also used DNA fiber assay to detect end resection and isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) assay to examine the RAD51 recruitment on replication fork. Results: A somatic 6 amino acid deletion (p819-824) in FANCD2 was identified in a head and neck tumor. FA-D2 mutant cells expressing the mutant cDNA demonstrated defects in FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and DNA damage hypersensitivity. A FANCD2-L822A mutant with defective BLM binding was identified (Figure A, B). We found that Bloom helicase and its DNA end resection activity within BLM-DNA2-RPA were negatively regulated by the heterodimer ID2 (Figure C, D). Both DNA and BLM binding of the ID2 are required for the inhibitory function. The premature DNA end resection and HU sensitivity in FANCD2 deficient and mutant cells are rescued by BLM knockdown. By iPOND assay, we discovered that FANCD2 antagonizes BLM to promote RAD51 recruitment on HU-stalled replication fork. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the DNA end resection activity of BLM-DNA2 is tightly regulated by FANCD2 to ensure that the nuclease DNA2 normally resects the DNA intermediate needed for efficient DNA repair and RAD51 recruitment to protect replication forks. Our findings highlight that ID2-BLM interaction functions in DNA damage repair to maintain genome stability. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Arginine methylation and ubiquitylation crosstalk controls DNA end-resection and homologous recombination repair

Cross-talk between distinct protein post-translational modifications is critical for an effective DNA damage response. Arginine methylation plays an important role in maintaining genome stability, but how this modification integrates with other enzymatic activities is largely unknown. Here, we identify the deubiquitylating enzyme USP11 as a previously uncharacterised PRMT1 substrate, and demonstrate that the methylation of USP11 promotes DNA end-resection and the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) by homologous recombination (HR), an event that is independent from another USP11-HR activity, the deubiquitylation of PALB2. We also show that PRMT1 is a ubiquitylated protein that it is targeted for deubiquitylation by USP11, which regulates the ability of PRMT1 to bind to and methylate MRE11. Taken together, our findings reveal a specific role for USP11 during the early stages of DSB repair, which is mediated through its ability to regulate the activity of the PRMT1-MRE11 pathway.

DNA-PK Promotes DNA End Resection at DNA Double Strand Breaks in G0 cells

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination is confined to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle partly due to 53BP1 antagonizing DNA end resection in G1 phase and non-cycling quiescent (G0) cells where DSBs are predominately repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Unexpectedly, we uncovered extensive MRE11- and CtIP-dependent DNA end resection at DSBs in G0 mammalian cells. A whole genome CRISPR/Cas9 screen revealed the DNA-dependent kinase (DNA-PK) complex as a key factor in promoting DNA end resection in G0 cells. In agreement, depletion of FBXL12, which promotes ubiquitylation and removal of the KU70/KU80 subunits of DNA-PK from DSBs, promotes even more extensive resection in G0 cells. In contrast, a requirement for DNA-PK in promoting DNA end resection in proliferating cells at the G1 or G2 phase of the cell cycle was not observed. Our findings establish that DNA-PK uniquely promotes DNA end resection in G0, but not in G1 or G2 phase cells, and has important implications for DNA DSB repair in quiescent cells.

Disruption of Chromatin Dynamics by Hypotonic Stress Suppresses HR and Shifts DSB Processing to Error-Prone SSA

The processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) depends on the dynamic characteristics of chromatin. To investigate how abrupt changes in chromatin compaction alter these dynamics and affect DSB processing and repair, we exposed irradiated cells to hypotonic stress (HypoS). Densitometric and chromosome-length analyses show that HypoS transiently decompacts chromatin without inducing histone modifications known from regulated local chromatin decondensation, or changes in Micrococcal Nuclease (MNase) sensitivity. HypoS leaves undisturbed initial stages of DNA-damage-response (DDR), such as radiation-induced ATM activation and H2AX-phosphorylation. However, detection of ATM-pS1981, γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci is reduced in a protein, cell cycle phase and cell line dependent manner; likely secondary to chromatin decompaction that disrupts the focal organization of DDR proteins. While HypoS only exerts small effects on classical nonhomologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) and alternative end-joining (alt-EJ), it markedly suppresses homologous recombination (HR) without affecting DNA end-resection at DSBs, and clearly enhances single-strand annealing (SSA). These shifts in pathway engagement are accompanied by decreases in HR-dependent chromatid-break repair in the G2-phase, and by increases in alt-EJ and SSA-dependent chromosomal translocations. Consequently, HypoS sensitizes cells to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced killing. We conclude that HypoS-induced global chromatin decompaction compromises regulated chromatin dynamics and genomic stability by suppressing DSB-processing by HR, and allowing error-prone processing by alt-EJ and SSA.

The Effect of Atypical Nucleic Acids Structures in DNA Double Strand Break Repair: A Tale of R-loops and G-Quadruplexes

The fine tuning of the DNA double strand break repair pathway choice relies on different regulatory layers that respond to environmental and local cues. Among them, the presence of non-canonical nucleic acids structures seems to create challenges for the repair of nearby DNA double strand breaks. In this review, we focus on the recently published effects of G-quadruplexes and R-loops on DNA end resection and homologous recombination. Finally, we hypothesized a connection between those two atypical DNA structures in inhibiting the DNA end resection step of HR.

DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of histone H2A at serine 15 is linked to DNA end resection

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs in chromatin and several histone post-translational modifications have been implicated in the process. Modifications of histone H2A N-terminal tail has also been linked to DNA damage response, through acetylation or ubiquitination of lysine residues that regulate repair pathway choice. Here, we characterize a new DNA damage-induced phosphorylation on chromatin, at serine 15 of H2A in yeast. We show that this SQ motif functions independently of the classical S129 C-terminal site (γH2A) and mutant mimicking constitutive phosphorylation increases cell sensitivity to DNA damage. H2AS129ph is induced by Tel1 ATM and Mec1 ATR , and loss of Lcd1 ATRIP or Mec1 signaling decreases γH2A spreading distal to the DSB. In contrast, H2AS15ph is completely dependent on Lcd1 ATRIP , indicating that this modification only happens when end resection is engaged. This is supported by an increase of RPA and a decrease in DNA signal near the DSB in the H2AS-15E phosphomimic mutant, indicating higher resection. This serine is replaced by a lysine in mammals (H2AK15), which undergoes an acetyl-monoubiquityl switch to regulate binding of 53BP1 and resection. This regulation seems functionally conserved with budding yeast H2AS15 and 53BP1-homolog Rad9, using different post-translational modifications between organisms but achieving the same function.