912. Expansion of Hepatitis C Treatment with New Medicaid Subscription Model in Louisiana

Background It is estimated that nearly 80,000 people with hepatitis C are living in Louisiana, many with Medicaid coverage. Previously, only Medicaid patients free from drugs and alcohol with a fibrosis score of F3 or F4 were eligible for treatment, resulting in few patients receiving treatment. Beginning in July 2019, generic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir was made available through the Medicaid program in a subscription model, allowing unlimited hepatitis C treatment in Louisiana’s Medicaid program for 5 years at a set price to the program. This has dramatically expanded access to Hepatitis C treatment for people with Medicaid in Louisiana. Methods Patients with Hepatitis C seen in the Infectious Diseases Center at University Medical Center in New Orleans, in 2020 by the 5 main hepatitis C providers were included. Demographics and laboratory data were collected to determine outcomes. Results Most patients with a hepatitis C (HCV) viral load and insurance data had Medicaid (80%, N=275). Twenty-two (8%) were HIV co-infected. Most were men (75%) and African-American (77%). Among the mono-infected patients with Medicaid and an HCV viral load, 216 (85%) had an undetectable viral load by the beginning of June 2021. Of the remaining 37 patients, 30 patients were prescribed treatment; but did not take it (n=4), didn’t follow-up (n=23), or followed-up but never got labs (n=3). One was treated but had a treatment failure (n=1). Six of the 37 were not prescribed medications due to a short life expectancy or significant drug interactions. The percentage of patients with an undetectable viral load was similar by gender and race, however younger age groups had lower viral suppression. In those aged less than 35, only 47% had an undetectable viral load and among those aged 36 to 44, it was 66%. Using the previous criteria of requiring a fibrosis score of F3 or F4, only 20% (n=44) would have been eligible for medicine to treat hepatitis C. Conclusion The new hepatitis C treatment subscription model with resultant removal of previous barriers has dramatically expanded treatment for people with Medicaid in Louisiana. More than five times the number of Medicaid patients received treatment in 2020 in our academic medical clinic. Disclosures Yussef Bennani, MD, MPH, Gilead Sciences (Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV Healthcare (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Dental Services and Health Outcomes in the New York State Medicaid Program

Previous reports suggest that periodontal treatment is associated with improved health care outcomes and reduced costs. Using data from the New York State Medicaid program, rates of emergency department (ED) use and inpatient admissions (IPs), as well as costs for ED, IPs, pharmacy, and total health care, were studied to determine the association of preventive dental care to health care outcomes. Utilization of dental services in the first 2 y (July 2012–June 2014) was compared to health care outcomes in the final year (July 2014–June 2015). Costs and utilization for members who did not receive dental services (No Dental) were compared to those who received any dental care (Any Dental), any preventive dental care (PDC), PDC without an extraction and/or endodontic treatment (PDC without Ext/Endo), PDC with an Ext/Endo (PDC with Ext/Endo), or Ext/Endo without PDC (Ext/Endo without PDC). Propensity scores were used to adjust for potential confounders. After adjustment, ED rate ratios were significantly lower for PDC and PDC without Ext/Endo but higher for the Any Dental and Ext/Endo without PDC. IP ratios were lower for all treatment groups except Ext/Endo without PDC. ED costs differed little compared to the No Dental group except for Ext/Endo without PDC. For IPs, costs per member were significantly lower for all groups (−$262.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), −325.40 to −200.42] to −$379.82 [95% CI, −451.27 to −308.37]) except for Ext/Endo without PDC. For total health care costs, Ext/Endo without PDC had a significantly greater total health care cost ($530.50 [95% CI, 156.99–904.01]). Each additional PDC visit was associated with a 3% reduction in the relative risk for ED and 9% reduction for IPs. Costs also decreased for total health care (−$235.64 [95% CI, −299.95 to −171.33]) and IP (−$181.39 [95% CI, −208.73 to −154.05]). In conclusion, an association between PDC and improved health care outcomes was observed, with the opposite association for Ext/Endo without PDC.