medicaid spending
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

70
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1744-1749
Author(s):  
Farideh Sistani ◽  
Robert M Reed ◽  
Chintal H Shah ◽  
Zafar Zafari

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kate Bundorf ◽  
Daniel Kessler
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. e213177
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Sachs ◽  
Kyle A. Gavulic ◽  
Julie M. Donohue ◽  
Stacie B. Dusetzina

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-547
Author(s):  
Yusun Kim

In 2005, New York (NY) state capped the growth of county-level Medicaid spending, which abruptly decreased counties’ Medicaid outlay in both relative and absolute terms. This study exploits this discontinuity in county Medicaid outlay to estimate the impact of the relief mandate policy on county budgets and property tax levies. It bridges a gap in the public finance literature by addressing local government responses to a sudden decrease in the outlay of a large mandatory spending category. We find a compositional change but no income effect on non-Medicaid spending. However, the policy reduced the effective property tax rate significantly by 6.6 to 8.1 percent on average among affected NY counties after the enactment of the policy relative to control counties. This study advances our understanding of local fiscal responses to an intergovernmental fiscal policy that changes how state and local governments share the costs of a large public social insurance program.


Author(s):  
Ransome Eke ◽  
Xin (Thomas) Yang ◽  
Kiersten L. Bond ◽  
Courtney Hanson ◽  
Caroline Jenkins ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 779-785
Author(s):  
Aayan N. Patel ◽  
Aaron S. Kesselheim ◽  
Benjamin N. Rome

Author(s):  
Melissa K. Sherry ◽  
David M. Bishai ◽  
William V. Padula ◽  
Jonathan P. Weiner ◽  
Sarah L. Szanton ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mina Kabiri ◽  
Alison Sexton Ward ◽  
Abhilasha Ramasamy ◽  
Rebecca Kee ◽  
Rahul Ganguly ◽  
...  

While substantial public health investment in anti-smoking initiatives has had demonstrated benefits on health and fiscal outcomes, similar investment in reducing obesity has not been undertaken, despite the substantial burden obesity places on society. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are poorly prescribed despite evidence that weight loss is not sustained using other strategies alone. We used a simulation model to estimate the potential impact of 100% uptake of AOMs on Medicare and Medicaid spending, disability payments, and taxes collected relative to status quo with negligible AOM use. Relative to status quo, AOM use simulation would result in Medicare and Medicaid savings of $231.5 billion and $188.8 billion respectively over 75 years. Government tax revenues would increase by $452.8 billion. Overall, the net benefit would be $746.6 billion. Anti-smoking efforts have had substantial benefits for society. A similar investment in obesity reduction, including broad use of AOMs, should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document