high order methods
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

207
(FIVE YEARS 42)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 389 ◽  
pp. 114366
Author(s):  
Erik Burman ◽  
Omar Duran ◽  
Alexandre Ern

2022 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Laughton ◽  
Vidhi Zala ◽  
Akil Narayan ◽  
Robert M. Kirby ◽  
David Moxey

AbstractAs the use of spectral/hp element methods, and high-order finite element methods in general, continues to spread, community efforts to create efficient, optimized algorithms associated with fundamental high-order operations have grown. Core tasks such as solution expansion evaluation at quadrature points, stiffness and mass matrix generation, and matrix assembly have received tremendous attention. With the expansion of the types of problems to which high-order methods are applied, and correspondingly the growth in types of numerical tasks accomplished through high-order methods, the number and types of these core operations broaden. This work focuses on solution expansion evaluation at arbitrary points within an element. This operation is core to many postprocessing applications such as evaluation of streamlines and pathlines, as well as to field projection techniques such as mortaring. We expand barycentric interpolation techniques developed on an interval to 2D (triangles and quadrilaterals) and 3D (tetrahedra, prisms, pyramids, and hexahedra) spectral/hp element methods. We provide efficient algorithms for their implementations, and demonstrate their effectiveness using the spectral/hp element library Nektar++ by running a series of baseline evaluations against the ‘standard’ Lagrangian method, where an interpolation matrix is generated and matrix-multiplication applied to evaluate a point at a given location. We present results from a rigorous series of benchmarking tests for a variety of element shapes, polynomial orders and dimensions. We show that when the point of interest is to be repeatedly evaluated, the barycentric method performs at worst $$50\%$$ 50 % slower, when compared to a cached matrix evaluation. However, when the point of interest changes repeatedly so that the interpolation matrix must be regenerated in the ‘standard’ approach, the barycentric method yields far greater performance, with a minimum speedup factor of $$7\times $$ 7 × . Furthermore, when derivatives of the solution evaluation are also required, the barycentric method in general slightly outperforms the cached interpolation matrix method across all elements and orders, with an up to $$30\%$$ 30 % speedup. Finally we investigate a real-world example of scalar transport using a non-conformal discontinuous Galerkin simulation, in which we observe around $$6\times $$ 6 × speedup in computational time for the barycentric method compared to the matrix-based approach. We also explore the complexity of both interpolation methods and show that the barycentric interpolation method requires $${\mathcal {O}}(k)$$ O ( k ) storage compared to a best case space complexity of $${\mathcal {O}}(k^2)$$ O ( k 2 ) for the Lagrangian interpolation matrix method.


Author(s):  
Théophile Chaumont-Frelet ◽  
Alexandre Ern ◽  
Simon Lemaire ◽  
Frédéric Valentin

We establish the equivalence between the Multiscale Hybrid-Mixed (MHM) and the Multiscale Hybrid High-Order (MsHHO) methods for a variable diffusion problem with piecewise polynomial source term. Under the idealized assumption that the local problems defining the multiscale basis functions are exactly solved, we prove that the equivalence holds for general polytopal (coarse) meshes and arbitrary approximation orders. We also leverage the interchange of properties to perform a unified convergence analysis, as well as to improve on both methods.


Author(s):  
Benjamin Weber ◽  
Gunilla Kreiss ◽  
Murtazo Nazarov

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash Hedayati Nasab ◽  
Carlos A. Pereira ◽  
Brian C. Vermeire

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document