random biopsy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

50
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Zulfiqar ◽  
H Baig ◽  
M Buksh

Abstract Aim We aimed to evaluate optimal random biopsy criteria are being followed in our institution to increase the diagnostic yield of a subsequent histopathological examination and to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in which histopathology is unlikely to deliver clinically useful information and causing a burden on health resources in terms of cost and manpower. Method Our study was a retrospective on 419 random colonoscopy biopsies performed over 6 months. Data collection included variables such as age, gender, indications, request of urgency, and histology findings. Data analysis was done descriptively. Results Out of 419 random biopsies, only 10.02% had positive findings. The total number of histology results with microscopic colitis was 10. The main indication of the random colonic biopsy was a change in bowel habits (328 cases) followed by significant diarrhea greater than 50 years in 20 cases. In patients with a change in bowel habits, 2.44% of histopathology specimens revealed microscopic colitis. The percentage of random colonic biopsy histology in patients greater than 50 years with significant diarrhea showed microscopic colitis was 10%. Conclusions Our study revealed random biopsy during colonoscopy should only be done in selected patients otherwise it has low diagnostic yields biopsy and should only be reserved for patients with risk factors for optimum utilization of health resources and to reduce the cost burden. A scoring system may be helpful to risk-stratify patients in low and high risk for MC to determine which patients qualify for RCB.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Tafuri ◽  
Marco Sebben ◽  
Giovanni Novella ◽  
Marco Pirozzi ◽  
Tania Processali ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-406
Author(s):  
Wei Keith Tan ◽  
Nicholas J. Shaheen
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alshelleh ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Matthew McKinley ◽  
Molly Stewart ◽  
Jeffrey S. Novak ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 456-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Benito Porcaro ◽  
Alessandro Tafuri ◽  
Giovanni Novella ◽  
Marco Sebben ◽  
Arianna Mariotto ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. S169-S170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alshelleh ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Dennis Han ◽  
Jeffrey Novak ◽  
Keith Sultan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio B. Porcaro ◽  
Paolo Corsi ◽  
Nicolò de Luyk ◽  
Marco Sebben ◽  
Alessandro Tafuri ◽  
...  

Objective To investigate prostate volume index (PVI), defined as the ratio of volume of the transitional zone on that of the peripheral zone, as a factor stratifying prostate cancer (PCA) risk in patients elected to a first random biopsy set. Methods The study evaluated 596 patients who were elected to a first random biopsy set because of suspected PCA in a period between September 2010 and September 2015. Prostate volume index was dichotomized to PVI ≤1 vs PVI >1. The multivariate logistic regression model investigated clinical factors with dichotomized PVI associating with PCA. Results The detection rate of PCA was 49%. The dichotomized PVI >1 stratified PCA risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.455; p<0.0001) beyond age (OR 1.062; p<0.0001), PSA (OR 1.167; p<0.0001), PV (OR 0.957; p<0.0001), and abnormal digital rectal examination (OR 2.094; p<0.0001). The goodness of fit statistics assessed model efficacy. Conclusions A large cohort of patients elected to a first random biopsy set had PCA risk stratified by dichotomized PVI beyond other clinical independent factors. Confirmatory studies are required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document