form theorem
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Stephane Geudens ◽  
Marco Zambon

Abstract We study coisotropic submanifolds of b-symplectic manifolds. We prove that b-coisotropic submanifolds (those transverse to the degeneracy locus) determine the b-symplectic structure in a neighborhood, and provide a normal form theorem. This extends Gotay’s theorem in symplectic geometry. Further, we introduce strong b-coisotropic submanifolds and show that their coisotropic quotient, which locally is always smooth, inherits a reduced b-symplectic structure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 375 (3) ◽  
pp. 2089-2153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Biasco ◽  
Jessica Elisa Massetti ◽  
Michela Procesi

2017 ◽  
Vol 287 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Frejlich ◽  
Ioan Mărcuţ

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-339
Author(s):  
Chunlan Jiang ◽  
Rui Shi

AbstractIn this paper, we develop a generalized Jordan canonical form theorem for a certain class of operators in ℒ(Η). A complete criterion for similarity for this class of operators in terms of K-theory for Banach algebras is given.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER FRITZ

AbstractThis paper is concerned with a propositional modal logic with operators for necessity, actuality and apriority. The logic is characterized by a class of relational structures defined according to ideas of epistemic two-dimensional semantics, and can therefore be seen as formalizing the relations between necessity, actuality and apriority according to epistemic two-dimensional semantics. We can ask whether this logic is correct, in the sense that its theorems are all and only the informally valid formulas. This paper gives outlines of two arguments that jointly show that this is the case. The first is intended to show that the logic is informally sound, in the sense that all of its theorems are informally valid. The second is intended to show that it is informally complete, in the sense that all informal validities are among its theorems. In order to give these arguments, a number of independently interesting results concerning the logic are proven. In particular, the soundness and completeness of two proof systems with respect to the semantics is proven (Theorems 2.11 and 2.15), as well as a normal form theorem (Theorem 3.2), an elimination theorem for the actuality operator (Corollary 3.6), and the decidability of the logic (Corollary 3.7). It turns out that the logic invalidates a plausible principle concerning the interaction of apriority and necessity; consequently, a variant semantics is briefly explored on which this principle is valid. The paper concludes by assessing the implications of these results for epistemic two-dimensional semantics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document