Abstract
Background: Low and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a dire need for trained mental health professionals, especially for children. While teachers’ child development expertise potentially positions them to serve as lay counselors, they have rarely delivered indicated child mental health care in LMICs. As part of assessing the feasibility of teachers serving as lay counselors, we explored teachers’ perceptions about serving as mental health lay counselors on top of typical professional duties and their attitudes towards and knowledge about mental health after serving as lay counselors.Methods: In 2018, 20 primary school teachers from five rural, low cost private schools in Darjeeling, India, received training and supervision to serve as lay mental health counselors in their classrooms. Using mixed methods, we measured teacher mental health attitudes and knowledge and perceptions of serving as lay counselor with study-specific assessments and through semi-structured interviews. Pre-training, post-training, and post-intervention mean scores were compared using paired t tests. Post-intervention interviews were coded for teachers’ mental health attitudes and knowledge and perceptions of serving as lay counselor. Results: Interviews revealed teachers qualitatively having more inclusive mental health attitudes, expressing a willingness to serve as lay counselor, and retaining mental health knowledge as applicable to what may be used during instructional time. By contrast, quantitatively, teachers’ attitudes appeared to become more inclusive on the study-specific survey pre versus post-training, but reverted to pre-training levels post-intervention. Teachers’ mental health counseling knowledge on the quantitative study-specific assessment did not change pre-training versus post-training versus post-intervention.Conclusions: Training, supervision, and serving as lay counselors led to teachers’ willingness to serve as lay counselors. Teachers served as lay counselors by incorporating therapeutic techniques into their student interactions during class time and as part of their typical instruction, not through delivering one-on-one office-like traditional care. Their changes in attitudes and knowledge reflected those expected within an “education as therapy” emerging system of care. Quantitative measures of knowledge and attitude changes did not capture these nuanced changes.Trial Registration: The parent feasibility trial was registered on January 01, 2018 with Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI), reg. no. CTRI/2018/01/011471, ref. no. REF/2017/11/015895. http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pdf_generate.php?trialid=21129&EncHid=&modid=&compid=%27,%2721129det%27