Urban Children’s Well-Being Factors and Qualities of Being and Doing in Natural Space: Nature Immersion

Research has suggested positive effects of nature immersion–a state of being or an act of doing in natural space–for urban children who were otherwise at risk for emotional or behavioral problems. However, few studies have systematically investigated natural space qualities that predict child well-being at the clinical level. The purpose of this study was to increase the understanding of natural space qualities as factors of urban child well-being. Explanatory mixed methods were used. Quantitative data ( N = 174) included a survey and two parental reports of child well-being. Interviews provided qualitative data ( N = 15). Data were analyzed using generalized linear model and content analysis. Both data streams were merged into a point of meta-inference that contributed to parental assessment of enhanced child well-being: More frequent nature–child space-time immersion combined with parental valuing of nature connection ( p < .001) as a soothing and safe resource. The factors of urban nature immersion affected child well-being over parental socioeconomic affluence alone. The evidence corresponds to Nightingale’s tenet that an act of doing, which is considered an action of the child’s own will, affects one’s sense of well-being. The findings indicate that nature immersion can be applied to urban child self-care and holistic nursing modalities.

A Guide to Nature Immersion: Psychological and Physiological Benefits

Nature exposure has been renowned for its positive physiological and psychological benefits. Recent years have seen a rise in nature immersion programs that make use of Guided Forest Therapy walks in a standard sequence of sensory awareness activities to expose participants to natural environments in a safe but effective manner. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of guided versus unguided nature immersion, upon three dependent variables of mood, nature connectedness and heartrate. 51 participants were assigned to either guided or unguided nature immersion. Nature connectedness (Connectedness to Nature Scale, CNS), Environmental Identity Scale, EID short form) and mood (Positive and Negative Affect Scale, PANAS) were assessed before and after nature immersion, while heart rate was tracked continuously by a wristwatch heart rate tracker throughout the 2-h experience. Demographics and general health practice (GHP) information were also collected. A mixed model ANOVA revealed that nature connectedness and mood (but not heart rate) improved post-immersion for all participants. Comparing the guided/unguided conditions, there were no significant differences in the change in nature connectedness, mood or heart rate. Comparing within the five segments within the standard sequence in the guided condition, the third and fifth segments revealed a significantly lower heart rate compared to the baseline heart rate.