Which Factors Affect the Rate of Surgery Performed in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

Background: Carpal tunnel release is recommended when patients have positive electrophysiologic test and their symptoms are not resolved in spite of conservative treatment. However, only some of them eventually undergo the surgery. The purposes of this study, therefore, were to evaluate the rate of carpal tunnel release performed among the patients with positive electrophysiologic test, and to identify which factors were associated with the rate of the surgery. Methods: Subjects of this study were 865 wrists of 508 patients (90 males and 418 females) who were diagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome between January 2013 and December 2016. The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome was confirmed by electrophysiologic test, and only the patients who were followed up for more than 1 year were enrolled in this study. The average age at the time of the electrophysiologic test performed was 61.4 years, and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome was evaluated according to the Bland scale (Gr 1–6) based on the electrophysiologic test. Whether or not the patients received carpal tunnel release was evaluated at the last follow-up visit. Results: Among the 865 wrists, carpal tunnel release was performed on 528 wrists (61%). Rate of the surgery performed significantly increased in patients with more severe grades on electrophyisiologic test. More patients in female (63.3%) than in male (50.3%) and more patients with age under 60 (67.5%) than age over 60 (57.1%) received the surgery. However, there was no significant difference in the rate of carpal tunnel release according to the bilaterality or dominant hand. Conclusions: The rate of carpal tunnel release among the patients diagnosed and confirmed as carpal tunnel syndrome was not higher than we expected. We should also pay more attention to the patients who did not undergo carpal tunnel release and investigate the reasons why those patients did not undergo surgery.

Brainstem auditory evoked potential testing in Dalmatian dogs in Brazil

The brain stem auditory-evoked potential (BAEP) is an electrophysiologic test that detects and records the electrical activity in the auditory system from cochlea to midbrain, generated after an acoustic stimulus applied to the external ear. The aim of this study is to obtain normative data for BAEP in Dalmatian dogs in order to apply this to the evaluation of deafness and other neurologic disorders. BAEP were recorded from 30 Dalmatian dogs for a normative Brazilian study. Mean latencies for waves I, III, and V were 1.14 (±0.09), 2.62 (±0.10), and 3.46 (±0.14) ms, respectively. Mean inter-peak latencies for I-III, III-V, and I-V intervals were 1.48 (±0.17), 0.84 (±0.12), and 2.31 (±0.18) ms, respectively. Unilateral abnormalities were found in 16.7% of animals and bilateral deafness was seen in one dog. The normative data obtained in this paper is compatible with other published data. As far as we know this is the first report of deafness occurrence in Dalmatian dogs in Brazil.

Clinical Update: Assessing Common Issues in Electrophysiologic Studies

Electrodiagnosis is a quantitative electrophysiologic test that may identify and localize the site of neurologic dysfunction and detect subclinical changes and compensatory processes. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies useful in evaluating the peripheral nervous system and spinal cord include electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction studies, and somatosensory evoked potentials. The primary uses of these tests are to evaluate radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathy, or other peripheral nerve study, and results must be presented completely, concisely, and in a standardized format understandable to nonelectromyographers (who may include adjusters, attorneys, hearing officers, and judges with varying degrees of knowledge about clinical neurology). Needle EMG remains the most sensitive electrophysiologic test for determining radiculopathy. Any EDX report should contain the fundamental test results and a summary of the findings and should make clear when facts other than neurophysiological data are included. Reports must be internally consistent to avoid compromising the report's integrity. Errors of fact and technique, incomplete or irrelevant data, and over-, mis-, and underinterpretation of data are too frequent in EMG reports. EDX studies objectively define peripheral nerve injuries, entrapment neuropathies, and radiculopathies; the findings must be clearly presented with supportable conclusions. Carpal tunnel syndrome practice parameters from the American Academy of Neurology and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation are provided.

Sep diagnosing neurophaty of the lateral cutaneous branch of the iliohypogastric nerve: case report

The article pertains to the uncommon clinical case of a patient with a proximal neuropathy of the lower extremity. It outlines the electrophysiological evaluation and reviews the medical literature. The electrophysiologic test that most accurately revealed the neuropathy was the segmental somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) of the lateral cutaneous branch of the iliohypogastric nerve. It showed well-defined and replicable cortical waveforms following the excitation of the lateral cutaneous branch of the iliohypogastric nerve in the asymptomatic lower extremity, but failed to present somatosensory evoked potentials arising from the excitation of the contralateral nerve in the symptomatic lower extremity. We did not find any previous reports diagnosing that particular pathology by the use of segmental SEP. In conclusion, it is important to remember that the accurate diagnosis of patients complaining of pain and dysesthesia in the proximal part of the lower extremities can possibly be achieved through the use of electrophysiologic tests such as the segmental SEP.