Rationale: Mitochondrial fission and fusion are relatively infrequent in adult cardiomyocytes compared to other cell types. This is surprising considering that proteins involved in mitochondrial dynamics are highly expressed in the heart. It has been previously reported that dynamin related protein 1 (DRP1) has a critical role in mitochondrial fitness and cardiac protection. Cardiac DRP1 ablation in the adult heart evokes a progressive dilated cardiac myopathy and lethal heart failure. Nevertheless, the conditional cardiacspecific DRP1 knock out animals present a significantly longer survival rate compared with global DRP1 KO models. We have described before the great importance for cardiac physiology of the strategic positioning of mitochondrial proteins in the cardiac tissue. Therefore, we hypothesize that DRP1 plays a regulatory role in cardiac physiology and mitochondrial fitness by preferentially accumulating at mitochondria and junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum (jSR) contact sites, where the high Ca2+ microdomain is formed during excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. Objective: This study aims to determine whether mitochondria-associated DRP1 is preferentially accumulated in the mitochondria and jSR contact sites and if indeed this is the case, what is the mechanism responsible for such a biased distribution and what is the functional implication. Methods and Results: Using high-resolution imaging approaches, we found that mitochondria-associated DRP1 in cardiomyocytes was localized in the discrete regions where T-tubule, jSR, and mitochondria are adjacent to each other. Western blot results showed that mitochondria-bound DRP1 was restricted to the mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM), with undetectable levels in purified mitochondria. Furthermore, in comparison to the cytosolic DRP1, the membrane-bound DRP1 in SR and MAM fractions formed high molecular weight oligomers. In both electrically paced adult cardiomyocytes and Langendorff-perfused beating hearts, the oscillatory Ca2+ pulses preserved MAM-associated DRP1 accumulation. Interestingly, similar to DRP1, all mitochondria-bound βACTIN only exists in MAM and not in the purified mitochondria. Additionally, co-immunoprecipitation pulls down both DRP1 and βACTIN together. Inhibition of βACTIN polymerization with Cytochalasin D disrupts the tight association between DRP1 and βACTIN. In cardiac specific DRP1 knockout mouse after 6 weeks of tamoxifen induction the cardiomyocytes show disarray of sarcomere, a decrease of cardiac contraction, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential significantly decreased spare respiratory capacity, and frequent occurrence of earl after contraction, suggesting the heart is susceptible for failure and arrhythmias. Despite of this phenotype, DRP1icKo animal have a longer life spam than other DRP1 KO models. We also observed that DRP1icKO. Strikingly, DRP1 levels are is only modestly decreased in the MAM when compared with the rest of the cellular fractions. These preserved levels were accompanied with preservation of the mitochondrial pool in the MAM fraction obtained from the DRP1icKO hearts. Conclusions: The results show that in adult cardiomyocytes, mitochondria bound DRP1 clusters in high molecular weight protein complexes at MAM. This clustering is fortified by EC coupling mediated Ca2+ transients and requires its interaction with βACTIN. Together with the better preserved dRP1 levels in the DRP1icKO model in the MAM, we conclude that DRP1 is anchored in mitochondria-SR interface through βACTIN and position itself to play a fundamental role in regulating mitochondrial quality control in the working heart.