inhomogeneity correction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

208
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Paula Ramos Delgado ◽  
Andre Kuehne ◽  
Mariya Aravina ◽  
Jason M. Millward ◽  
Alonso Vázquez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Lin Wu ◽  
Tian He ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Hang Liu ◽  
Shuang Zhang ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Addressing intensity inhomogeneity is critical in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because associated errors can adversely affect post-processing and quantitative analysis of images (i.e., segmentation, registration, etc.), as well as the accuracy of clinical diagnosis. Although several prior methods have been proposed to eliminate or correct intensity inhomogeneity, some significant disadvantages have remained, including alteration of tissue contrast, poor reliability and robustness of algorithms, and prolonged acquisition time. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we propose an intensity inhomogeneity correction method based on volume and surface coils simultaneous reception (VSSR). METHODS: The VSSR method comprises of two major steps: 1) simultaneous image acquisition from both volume and surface coils and 2) denoising of volume coil images and polynomial surface fitting of bias field. Extensive in vivo experiments were performed considering various anatomical structures, acquisition sequences, imaging resolutions, and orientations. In terms of correction performance, the proposed VSSR method was comparatively evaluated against several popular methods, including multiplicative intrinsic component optimization and improved nonparametric nonuniform intensity normalization bias correction methods. RESULTS: Experimental results show that VSSR is more robust and reliable and does not require prolonged acquisition time with the volume coil. CONCLUSION: The VSSR may be considered suitable for general implementation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
Md Akhtaruzzaman ◽  
Paweł Kukołowicz

AbstractPurpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the dependence of tissue inhomogeneity correction factors (ICFs) on the photon beam quality index (QI).Materials and Methods: Heterogeneous phantoms, comprising semi-infinite slabs of the lung (0.10, 0.20, 0.26 and 0.30 g/cm3), adipose tissue (0.92 g/cm3) and bone (1.85 g/cm3) in water, were constructed in the Eclipse treatment planning system. Several calculation models of 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams for quality index (TPR20,10) = 0.670±k*0.01 and TPR20,10 = 0.760±k*0.01, k = -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 respectively were built in the Eclipse. The ICFs were calculated with the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) for several beam sizes and points lying at several depths inside of and below inhomogeneities of different thicknesses.Results: The ICFs increased for lung and adipose tissues with increasing beam quality (TPR20,10), while decreased for bone. Calculations with AAA predict that the maximum difference in ICFs of 1.0% and 2.5% for adipose and bone tissues, respectively. For lung tissue, changes of ICFs of a maximum of 9.2% (6 MV) and 13.8% (15 MV). For points where charged particle equilibrium exists, a linear dependence of ICFs on TPR20,10 was observed. If CPE doesn’t exist, the dependence became more complex. For points inside of the low-density inhomogeneity, the dependence of the ICFs on energy was not linear but the changes of ICFs were smaller than 3.0%. Measurements results carried out with the CIRS phantom were consistent with the calculation results.Conclusions: A negligible dependence of the ICFs on energy was found for adipose and bone tissue. For lung tissue, in the CPE region, the dependence of ICFs on different beam quality indexes with the same nominal energy may not be neglected, however, this dependence was linear. Where there is no CPE, the dependence of the ICFs on energy was more complicated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 101748
Author(s):  
Vishal Venkatesh ◽  
Neeraj Sharma ◽  
Munendra Singh

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 2684-2701
Author(s):  
Paula Ramos Delgado ◽  
Andre Kuehne ◽  
João S. Periquito ◽  
Jason M. Millward ◽  
Andreas Pohlmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document