science diplomacy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

259
(FIVE YEARS 148)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Marine Policy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 104906
Author(s):  
Lida Teneva ◽  
Aaron L. Strong ◽  
Vera Agostini ◽  
Kenneth J. Bagstad ◽  
Evangelia G. Drakou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 267-276
Author(s):  
Gerrit Rößler
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-264
Author(s):  
Ewelina Panas ◽  
Marcin Gołębiowski

Owing to current events in Belarus (political and social, including the economic crisis and the ongoing activities that are having a negative impact on the functioning of opposition movements), the country is becoming an arena of competition for influence. In the context of the subject of this analysis, rivalry, especially in terms of the influence of other states on Belarusian society, is of key importance. Science diplomacy may be a tool of competition for influence. The fact that science diplomacy can be both a tool with which to cooperate with other countries in the region and a tool of competition for influence is of key importance in analysing this problem. The scientific potential of the Belarusian community is also of interest to other countries, including Ukraine, Lithuania, and Germany. The effective and efficient implementation of science diplomacy activities towards Belarus is undoubtedly in line with the well-understood Polish national interest. The aim of the article was to conduct a political and legal analysis of the process by which Poland is using science diplomacy as a tool for influencing the scientific community of Belarus. Another research goal was to analyse the activities undertaken by two other countries in the region – Ukraine and Lithuania – with respect to science diplomacy. The article also aimed to analyse the formal and legal conditions related to the normative solutions used in the countries under analysis, enabling the undertaking and implementation of education by Belarusian citizens. The educational and scientific programmes offered to students and scientists from Belarus in Poland were also subject to legal analyses. The whole analysis is supplemented and concluded by an attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of the activities carried out so far.


Author(s):  
Francis Newman

In the early 1960s, amidst a period of considerable debate surrounding how civil science in Britain should be governed, British scientists—especially those associated with the Royal Society—and their counterparts in the People's Republic of China (PRC) began tentative exchange programmes. Although such unusual interactions between Cold War adversaries were enabled by claims that science was a universal and apolitical phenomenon, the ways in which institutional and individual participants were embroiled in these domestic debates illuminate how their ideological outlooks shaped their views on exchange and on the science they encountered. By focusing on three interrelated exchanges during this period—an individual scientist's visit to the PRC, a Royal Society delegation to China, and a larger research programme bringing junior Chinese researchers to Britain—I argue that participating British scientists' conceptualizations of ‘scientific freedom’ framed how they judged science in China, and the value of these exchanges; their observations and actions during these interactions reflected their views on domestic British debates over the governance of science. This study thereby sheds light on how the ideological attitudes of participants of science diplomacy shape its practice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 73-93
Author(s):  
E. William Colglazier ◽  
Hassan A. Vafai ◽  
Kevin E. Lansey ◽  
Molli D. Bryson
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 297-341
Author(s):  
E. William Colglazier ◽  
Hassan A. Vafai ◽  
Kevin E. Lansey ◽  
Molli D. Bryson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document